Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T19:04:25.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The World is Flat in the Twenty-First Century: A Response to Hasnas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Extract

Hasnas is correct that ethicists should pay attention to law and be on guard for perverse effects from regulation and legal interpretations that may encourage or require unethical behavior. He is not correct that the business ethics literature assumes that law and ethics consistently pull in the same direction. Analysis of the relationship between law and ethics requires nuanced, in-depth treatment. An example is provided regarding the well-known case of United States v. Park. Ultimately, there is a need for more serious consideration of ethical principles and norms in legal policy making and practice.

Type
Responses to Hasnas
Copyright
Copyright © Business Ethics Quarterly 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, Tom L., and Norman, E. Bowie. 2004. Ethical Theory and Business, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 1999. Business Ethics, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dunfee, Thomas W. 1996. “On the Synergistic, Interdependent Relationship of Business Ethics and Law.American Business Law Journal 34(2): 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar