Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:54:50.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

God and Mammon: The Modern Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

Lately, the field of business ethics has begun to take an intense interest in the relationship between religion and business ethics. Various books and articles are being produced at an increasing rate using theoretical and qualitative research methods. However, to date, almost no data exist quantifying relationships between religion and business ethics. This paper begins to provide such data by testing the relationships between religious upbringing, religious practice, Christian beliefs, and attitudes toward corporate social responsibility. Analysis of our sample demonstrates that religious practice and Christian beliefs have a weak relationship to attitudes toward corporate social responsibility.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AES Corporation. 1996. Annual Report.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. and Ross, J. M. 1967. “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 432443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, R.L.; Sadler, R.D.; Kobischen, E.E.; Skiff, D.M.; Merrill, I.J.; Atwater, B.J.; and Livermore, P. W. 1981. “The Shepherd Scale: Separating the sheep from the goats.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 9: 335351.Google Scholar
Calkins, M. 1997. “Recovering Religion’s Prophetic Voice for Business Ethics.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Business Ethics, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. and Dawson, L. E. 1996. “Personal Religiousness and Ethical Judgments: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Business Ethics 15: 359372.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. E. and Preston, L. E. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20: 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, E. M. 1997. “Contemporary Jewish Thought on Business Ethics: Some Perspectives and Reflections.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Business Ethics, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Evan, W. M. and Freeman, R. E. 1988. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism.” In Ethical Theory and Business, ed. Beuchamp, T. and Bowie, N.Englwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Frederick, W. C. 1995. Values, Nature, and Culture in the American Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1962/1982. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. and McPherson, S. E. 1989. “Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E Revised and Single-item Scales.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28: 348354.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. and Venable, G. D. 1983. “Development of an ‘Age-Universal’ I/E Scale.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 22: 181187.Google Scholar
Herman, S. W. and Schaefer, A. G., eds. 1997. “Western Religious Approaches to Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7, no. 2.Google Scholar
Hilty, D. M. and Morgan, R. L. 1985. “Construct Validation for the Religious Involvement Inventory: Replication.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 22: 181187.Google Scholar
King, M. B. and Hunt, R. A. 1975. “Measuring the Religious Variable: National Replication.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 14: 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.K.; Agle, B.R.; and Wood, D. J. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22: 853886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, L. 1994. Believers in Business. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. P. 1997. “Quaker Process Ethics: Principles for Acting and Learning with Others in Business and Organizational Life.” Paper presented at the Society for Business Ethics annual meeting, Boston.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pargament, K.I.; Kennell, J.; Hathaway, W.; Grevengoed, N.; Newman, J.; and Jones, W. 1988. “Religion and the Problem-solving Process: Three Styles of Coping.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 7: 90104Google Scholar
Stackhouse, M.L.; McCann, D.P.; Roels, S.J.; and Williams, P. N., eds. 1995. On Moral Business: Classic and Contemporary Resources for Ethics in Economic Life. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Toney, F. 1997. “CEO Application of Religious Teachings: Correlation with Goal Achievement and Personal Satisfaction.” F. Toney Research Journal.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K. and Nelson, K. A. 1995. Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How To Do It Right. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Tropman, J. E. 1995. The Catholic Ethic in American Society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Van Buren III, H. J. 1995. “Work and Religious Faith: How People of Faith Relate to Their Employers.” International Journal of Value-Based Management 8: 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buren III, H. J. and Agle, B. R. 1998. “Measuring Christian Beliefs that Might Affect Managerial Decision Making: A Beginning.” International Journal of Value-Based Management 11, no. 2: 159177.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1947. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Webley, S. 1997. Values inherent in the Interfaith Declaration of International Business Ethics. http://www.nd.edu:80/~isbee/p_webley.htm.Google Scholar
Williams, O. and Houck, J. 1992, eds. The Judeo-Christian Vision and the Modern Corporation. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, R. 1994. God and Mammon in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar