Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-rq46b Total loading time: 0.512 Render date: 2022-12-03T21:56:21.195Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Self Constitution as The Foundation for Leading Ethically: A Foucauldian Possibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Donna Ladkin*
Affiliation:
Plymouth University

Abstract:

This article challenges the assumption that the source of ethical leadership is the well-intentioned leader of good character. Drawing from Michel Foucault’s critical philosophy, it argues that those aspiring to lead ethically must actively constitute themselves in order to become subjects who are free to exercise ethical agency. The practices of self-care (epimeileisthai sautou) and courageous speech (parrhesia) are introduced as means by which such self-constitution can be approached. The case of US President Barack Obama’s inability to close the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay serves as an illustrative device to ground Foucault’s ideas. The argument enriches a philosophically informed rendering of ethical leadership in three ways: by highlighting the role resistance plays in any leader’s attempts to achieve ethical ends, by demonstrating the importance of an orientation of critique on the part of those aspiring to lead ethically, and by revealing the importance of followers in realizing ethical outcomes.

Type
Special Section
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. 2012. Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3): 367390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. 2003. Managers doing leadership: The extra-o ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12): 14351459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, E. 2001. Integrating leadership styles and ethical perspectives. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 18: 244256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, E. 2008. The later Foucault in organization and management studies. Human Relations, 61(4): 515537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. 1999. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 181217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J., & Shane, S. 2012. Secret “kill list” proves a test of Obama’s principles and will. The New York Times, May 29. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html.Google Scholar
Bernauer, J., & Mahon, M. 2003. Michel Foucault’s ethical imagination. In Gutting, G. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault: 149175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. 2010. Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 583616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. 2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 595616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2): 221235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. 2008. A curiously British story: Foucault goes to business school. International Studies of Management and Organization, 38(1): 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, C. 2002. Critical analysis of organizations: Theory, practice, revitalization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chambon, A. 1999. Reading Foucault for social work. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, A. 2000. Redirecting critique in postmodern organizaton studies: The perspective of Foucault. Organization Studies, 21(6): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A., & Garrick, J. 2002. Org theory in turbulent times: The traces of Foucault’s ethics. Organization, 9(4): 683701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chullen, C. L., Rowe, W. J., & Zemanek, J. E Jr.. 2015. Illusion of control: Theoretical perspective on power-dependence relationships. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(6): 6674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciulla, J. B. 1995. Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1): 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciulla, J. B. 2005. The state of leadership ethics and the work that lies before us. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4): 323335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciulla, J., Knights, D., Mabey, C., & Tomkins, L. 2015. Call for papers: Special issue on philosophical approaches to leadership ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. 1994. Weber and Foucault: Social theory for the study of organizations. Organization, 1(1): 149178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S., & Hardy, C. 1996. Some dare call it power. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies: 622641. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, post-modernism and organizational analysis 1. Organization Studies, 9(1): 91112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, A., Knights, D., & Starkey, K. 2008. The conditions of our freedom: Foucault, organization, and ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(3): 299320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, A. I. 2003. Ethics as ascetics: Foucault, the history of ethics, and ancient thought. In Gutting, G. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault: 123148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, I., Quinby, L., Benhabib, S., & Cornell, D. 1990. Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. Hypatia, 5(3): 118124.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1975. The birth of the clinic. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1976. The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977a. Archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977b. Discipline and punish. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977c. Madness and civilisation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1983. On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In Dreyfus, H. I. & Rabinow, P. (Eds.), Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics: 229252. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984a. Michel Foucault: Interview with Allesandro Fontano. In Kritzman, L. (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings: 49. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984b. Politics and ethics: An interview. In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought: 373380. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1985. The history of sexuality volume 2: The use of pleasure. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1994a. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984: Volume 1, ethics. Rabinow, P. (Ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1994b. The subject and power. In Faubian, J. D. (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 volume 3, Power: 326-348. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2000. Power. In Faubion, J. (Ed.), For an ethic of discomfort: 443448. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2001. The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the College de France 1981-1982. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2008a. The courage of truth: Lectures at the College de France 1983-1984. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2008b. The government of self and others: Lectures at the College de France 1982-1983. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Gemmill, G., & Oakley, J. 1992. Leadership: An alienating social myth? Human Relations, 45(2): 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. 1992. Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunties. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5): 379389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. D. 2002. Conceptualizing leadership with respect to its historical-contextual antecedents to power. Leadership Quarterly, 13(2): 151167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harter, N. 2016. Foucault on leadership: The leader as subject. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartman, E. M. 2006. Can we teach character? An Aristotelian answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(1): 6881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A. 1994. Power and knowledge in the practice of nursing: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(5): 935939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, E., Starr, B., & Walsh, D. 2009. Obama signs order to close Guantanamo Bay facility. CNN Politics, January 22. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/22/guantanamo.order/index.html.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. 1987. The archaeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3): 207234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, K., & Macve, R. 1986. Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(2): 105136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffer, L. 2009. Mad for Foucault: Rethinking the foundations of queer theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, J., & Dodge, G. 2001. Leadership deja vu all over again. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4): 435458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackall, R. 2010. Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knights, D. 2002. Writing organizational analysis with Foucault. Organization, 9(4): 575593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. 2016. The grand refusal?: Struggling with alternative Foucauldian inspired approaches to resistance at work. In Courpasson, D. & Vallas, S. (Eds.), Sage handbook of resistance: 98120. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., & Collinson, D. 1987. Disciplining the shop floor: A comparison of the disciplinary effects of managerial psychology and finance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(5): 457477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., & Morgan, G. 1992. Leadership and corporate strategy: Towards a critical analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 3(3): 171190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. 2005. Reflecting on corporate scandals: The failure of ethical leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4): 359366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. 2006. Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2): 125137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. 1989. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4): 535558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. 1992. Conceptualizing leadership processes: A study of senior managers in a financial services company. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6): 761782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. A. 1984. Essays in moral development, vol. II: The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lawton, A., & Páez, I. 2015. Developing a framework for ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3): 639649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxon, N. 2008. Ethics and subjectivity: Practices of self-governance in the late lectures of Michel Foucault. Political Theory, 36(3): 377402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, R. 2016. Foucault’s critical ethics. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1985. After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. 1989. Foucault and education. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2): 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. 2009. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, A., & Starkey, K. 1998. Foucault, management and organization theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McNay, L. 1992. Foucault and feminism: Power, gender and the self. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mendonca, M. 2001. Preparing for ethical leadership in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 18: 266276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. 1987. Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3): 235265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, D. J., & Seabright, M. A. 2000. The development of moral imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4): 845884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neubert, M., Carlson, D., Kacmar, K.M., Roberts, J., & Chonko, L. 2009. The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90: 157170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, A., & Schmitt, E. 2009. Terror attempt seen as man tries to ignite device on jet. The New York Times, December 25. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/26/us/26plane.html.Google Scholar
O’Farrell, C. 2005. Michel Foucault. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, J. P. 2011. Decision making in the Obama White House. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 41(2): 244262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. L. 2006. Understanding ethical failures in leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reicher, S., Haslam, S., & Hopkins, N. 2005. Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly, 16(4): 547568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid-Henry, S. 2007. Exceptional sovereignty? Guantanamo Bay and the re-colonial present. Antipode, 39(4): 627648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, J. 2003. Power/knowledge. In Gutting, G. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault: 95122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, M., & Carter, C. 2002. Foucault and history in organization studies. Organization, 9(4): 527547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinkman, A., McLean, A., Ashkennas, A., Tse, A., & Harris, J. 2017. The Guantanamo docket. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/guantanamo/detainees (accessed April 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L. & Neubaum, D. O. 2005. The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 135151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. 1992. Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, discipline and just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2): 271291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Y. 2012. CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3): 299312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townley, B. 1993. Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 518546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Pincus Hartman, L., & Brown, M. 2000. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4): 128142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartenberg, T. 1990. The forms of power: From domination to transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Weiskopf, R., & Willmott, H. 2013. Ethics as critical practice: The “Pentagon Papers,” deciding responsibly, truth-telling, and the unsettling of organizational morality. Organization Studies, 34(4): 469493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 2007. Mental models, moral imagination and system thinking in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3): 463474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray-Bliss, E. 2002. Abstract ethics, embodied ethics: The strange marriage of Foucault and positivism in labour process theory. Organization, 9(1): 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, T. 2011. “Anything but Bush?”: The Obama administration and Guantanamo Bay. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34(2): 453492.Google Scholar
14
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Self Constitution as The Foundation for Leading Ethically: A Foucauldian Possibility
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Self Constitution as The Foundation for Leading Ethically: A Foucauldian Possibility
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Self Constitution as The Foundation for Leading Ethically: A Foucauldian Possibility
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *