Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-lkb8j Total loading time: 0.341 Render date: 2022-01-16T22:11:31.246Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Lying: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Situational Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

Abstract:

Individuals often lie for psychological rewards (e.g., preserving self image and/or protecting others), absent economic rewards. We conducted a laboratory experiment, using a modified dictator game, to identify conditions that entice individuals to lie solely for psychological rewards. We argue that such lies can provide a ready means for individuals to manage others’ impression of them. We investigated the effect of social distance (the perceived familiarity, intimacy, or psychological proximity between two parties) and knowledge of circumstances (whether parties have common or asymmetric information) on the frequency of lying. We found that lying occurs more frequently when social distance is near and that the effect is exacerbated when information is asymmetric. Our theoretical development suggests that, under these conditions, individuals’ need to manage others’ impression is magnified. We discuss the implications of our findings.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. P. 1981. “Psychological Status of the Script Concept,” American Psychologist 36(7): 71529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., and Mael, F.. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review 14: 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsky, A. 2008. “Understanding the Ethical Cost of Organizational Goal-setting: A Review and Theory Development,” Journal of Business Ethics 81: 6381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., E. R. Thompson, and H. Chen. 2002. “Moral Hypocrisy: Addressing Some Alternatives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 33039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, T. J. F. 2004. “Preventing, Detecting, and Deterring Fraud: What Works and What Doesn’t,” Journal of Investment Compliance 5(2): 12027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, S. 1999. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon. (Original work published 1978.)Google Scholar
Borgadus, E. 1925. “The Origins of Social Distance,” Journal of Applied Psychology 9: 21626.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., and Gintis, H.. 2004. “The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations,” Theoretical Population Biology 65: 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, N. G., and Taylor, R. R.. 1998. “A Developmental Approach to the Examination of Friendship in Leader-Follower Relationships,” Leadership Quarterly 9(1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, J. 1992. “Down the Slippery Slope: Ethics and the Technical Writer as Marketer,” Technical Communication Quarterly 1(1): 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, N. R., Johnson, E. J., and Croson, R. T. A.. 2006. “Let’s Get Personal: An International Examination of the Influence of Communication, Culture, and Social Distance on Other Regarding Preferences,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60: 37398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camden, C., Motley, M. T, and Wilson, A.. 1984. “White Lies in Interpersonal Communication: A Taxonomy and Preliminary Investigation of Social Motivations,” Western Journal of Speech Communication 48: 30925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, T. 1993. “Second Thoughts about Bluffing,” Business Ethics Quarterly 3(4): 31741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, T.. 2001. “Deception and Withholding Information in Sales,” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2): 275306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. K., and Goto, S. G.. 2003. “Conflict Resolution In The Culturally Diverse Workplace: Some Data from Hong Kong Employees,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 52: 44160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., and Gneezy, U.. 2007. “What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63: 88103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Haruvy, E., and Sonsino, D.. 2007. “Social Distance and Reciprocity: An Internet Experiment,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63: 88103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., and Rabin, M.. 2002. “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3): 81769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Rigotti, L., and Rustichini, A.. 2007. “Individual Behavior and Group Membership,” American Economic Review 97: 134052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clore, G. L., Wyer, R. S. Jr., Dienes, B. Gasper, K. Gohm, C., and Isbell, L.. 2001. “Affective Feelings as Feedback: Some Cognitive Consequences,” in Theories of Mood and Cognition, ed. Martin, L. L. and Clore, G. L., 2762. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Comer, M. J. 1997. Corporate Fraud, 3rd ed. Burlington, Vt.: Gower Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, R., and Ingram, R.. 2003. “Social Networks and the Adverse Selection Problem in Agency Relationships,” Journal of Business Research 56: 76775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J., Cain, D. M., and Dawes, R. M.. 2006. “What You Don’t Know Won’t Hurt Me: Costly (but Quiet) Exit in Dictator Games,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100: 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., van Dijk, E., and Pillutla, M. M.. 2010. “Explaining Unfair Offers In Ultimatum Games and Their Effects on Trust: An Experimental Approach,” Business Ethics Quarterly 20: 10726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dees, J. G., and Cramton, P. C.. 1991. “Shrewd Bargaining on the Moral Frontier: Toward a Theory of Morality in Practice,” Business Ethics Quarterly 1(2): 13567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dees, J. G., and Cramton, P. C.. 1995. “Deception and Mutual Trust: A Reply to Strudler,” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(4): 82332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, B. M., and Kashy, D. A.. 1998. “Everyday Lies in Close and Casual Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 6379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A. Kirkendol, S. E. Wyer, M. M. and Epstein, J. A.. 1996. “Lying in Everyday Life,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 97995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derr, R. E. 2000. “Performing Exact Logistic Regression with the SAS Program,” Proceedings of the 25th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (SUGI 25): Paper P254-25.Google Scholar
Edwards, K. 1990. “The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(2): 20216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review 14(1): 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., Keysar, B. Boven, L. V., and Gilovich, T.. 2004. “Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 32739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., and Gachter, S.. 2002. “Altruistic Punishment in Humans,” Nature 415: 13740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, P. J., and Zyglidopoulos, S. C.. 2008. “The Escalation of Deception in Organizations,” Journal of Business Ethics 81(4): 83750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkes, V. S. 1982. “Communicating the Reasons for Social Rejection,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18: 23552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, N., J. Oppenheimer, and J. B. Moore. 2001. “Some Doubts about Measuring Self-Interest Using Dictator Experiments: The Costs of Anonymity,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 27190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabarro, J. J. 1987. “The Development of Working Relationships,” In Handbook of Organizational Behavior, ed. Lorsch, J. W., 17289. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., and Johnstone, M.. 1984. “Personality Judgments of Australian Aborigine and White Speakers: Ethnicity, Sex, and Context,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3: 3957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F., and Bazerman, M.. 2009. “When Misconduct Goes Unnoticed: The Acceptability of Gradual Erosion in Others’ Unethical Behavior,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 70819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. 1989. “Self-Serving Bias as a Self-Sensemaking Strategy: Explicit vs. Tacit Impression Management,” in Impression Management In The Organization, ed. Giacalone, R. A. and Rosenfield, P., 21934. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Grover, S. L. 1997. “Lying in Organizations,” in Antisocial Behavior in Organizations, ed. Giacalone, R. A. and Greenberg, J., 6884. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Grover, S. L.. 2005. “The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth: The Causes and Management of Workplace Lying,” Academy of Management Executive 19: 14857.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. A. 1977. “Mere Exposure,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 10, ed. L. Berkowitz, 4087. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J., and Goldman, M.. 1974. “Self-Esteem, Need for Approval, and Reactions to Personal Evaluations,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10(3): 20110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirji, K. F. 2006. Exact Analysis of Discrete Data. Bacon Raton, Fla.: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Holley, D. M. 1998. “Information Disclosure in Sales,” Journal of Business Ethics 17: 63141.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S.. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyk, R., and Hersey, P.. 2008. The Ethical Executive. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. D., and Vitell, S. J.. 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics,” Journal of Macromarketing 8: 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. D., and Vitell, S. J.. 1993. “The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision,” in Ethics in Marketing, ed. Smith, N. C. and Quelch, J. A., 77584. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin Publishers.Google Scholar
Ickes, W., Reidhead, S., and Patterson, M.. 1986. “Machiavellianism and Self-Monitoring: As Different as ‘Me’ and ‘You,’” Social Cognition 4: 5874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1991. “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model,” Academy of Management Review 16(2): 36695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, J. N. 1996. “Auditors’ Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems,” Journal of Business Ethics 15(10): 103350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R. L. 1995. “Understanding Life-Threatening Risks,” Risk Analysis 15(6): 62737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, S., and Cummings, J. N.. 2002. “What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research,” in Distributed Work, ed. Hinds, P. J. and Kiesler, S., 76109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1984. The Psychology of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper and Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., Hanna, B. A. Su, S., and Wei, J.. 2001. “Collective Identity, Collective Trust, and Social Capital: Linking Group Identification and Group Cooperation,” in Groups at Work: Theory and Research, ed. Turner, M. E., 17396. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R. 1995. Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R., and Kowalski, R. M.. 1990. “Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model,” Psychological Bulletin 107: 3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, L. G. 2002. “The Slippery Slope from Ambition to Greed to Dishonesty: Lawyers, Money, and Professional Integrity,” Hofstra Law Review 30: 879922.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F. 1996. “Behavioral Decision Theory and Business Ethics: Skewed Trade-Offs between Self and Other,” in Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics, ed. Messick, D. M. and Tenbrunsel, A. E., 21427. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
MacDonald, G., Saltzman, J. L., and Leary, M. R.. 2003. “Social Approval and Trait Self Esteem,” Journal of Research in Personality 37(2): 2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloch, K. 2001. “The White Lies of Leadership: Caring Dishonesty?,” Nursing Administration Quarterly 25: 6168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, P. M., and House, J. S.. 1973. “Exchange between Superiors and Subordinates in Large Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly 18: 20922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maremont, M. 1996. “Anatomy of a Fraud,” Business Week (September 16): 9094.Google Scholar
Marks, G., and Miller, N.. 1987. “Ten Years of Research on the False Consensus Effect: An Empirical and Theoretical Review,” Psychological Bulletin 102: 7290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P. A., and Drobnic, S.. 1992. “Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics,” American Sociological Review 57: 15370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. M., and Mackie, D. M.. 1989. “Intergroup Relations,” Annual Review of Psychology 40: 4581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, K. U., and Tesser, A.. 2001. “Deceptive Behavior in Social Relationships: A Consequence of Violated Expectations,” Journal of Psychology 122(3): 26373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R.E. 1989. “The Strength of Strong Ties: Social Networks and Intergroup Conflict in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal 32(2): 377401.Google Scholar
Nyberg, D. 1993. The Vanished Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Park, R. E. 1924. “The Concept of Social Distance,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 8: 33944.Google Scholar
Perrucci, R. 1963. “Social Distance Strategies and Intra-Organizational Stratification: A Study of the Status System on a Psychiatric Ward,” American Sociological Review 28: 95162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C. 1996. “Deception in Intimate Relationships,” International Journal of Psychology 31: 27988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, R. A. 2007. “Ethical Decision Making: More Needed than Good Intentions,” Financial Analysts Journal 63(6): 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rick, S., and Loewenstein, G.. 2008. “Hypermotivation,” Journal of Marketing Research 45: 64553.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. C., and Rymon, T.. 2001. “Purchasing Agents’ Deceptive Behavior: A Randomized Response Technique Study,” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3): 45579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L., Greene, D., and House, P.. 1977. “The ‘False Consensus’ Effect: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 279301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L., and Ward, A.. 1996. “Naïve Realism in Everyday Life: Implications for Social Conflict and Misunderstanding,” in Values and Knowledge, ed. Reed, E. S. Turiel, E. and Brown, T., 10330. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Ross, T. W., and Robertson, D. C.. 2000. “Lying: The Impact of Decision Context,” Business Ethics Quarterly 10(2): 40940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxe, L. 1991. “Lying,” American Psychologist 46: 40915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, B. R. 1980. Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, Inc.Google Scholar
Schlenker, B. R., and Pontari, B. A.. 2000. “The Strategic Control of Information: Impression Management and Self-Presentation in Daily Life,” in Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity, ed. Tesser, A. Felson, R. B. and Suls, J. M., 199232. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, J. C., and O’Hair, D.. 2005. “Uncovering Beliefs about Deceptive Communication,” Communication Quarterly 53(3): 37799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N., and Clore, G. L.. 1996. “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, ed. Kruglanski, A. W. and Higgins, E. T., 2nd edition, 385407. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, M. E., Ordonez, L., and Douma, B.. 2004. “Goal Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal 47(3): 42232.Google Scholar
Scott, E. D. 2003. “Plane Truth: A Qualitative Study of Employee Dishonesty in the Airline Industry,” Journal of Business Ethics 42: 32137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, M., and Evans, J. W.. 1961. “Stratification and Hospital Care: I. The Performance of the Medical Intern,” American Sociological Review 26: 6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, J., Dahl, D. W., and Gorn, G. J.. 2002. “Misrepresentation in the Consumer Context,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 12: 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, D. A., and Loewenstein, G. F.. 2005. “The Devil You Know: The Effects of Identifiability on Punishment,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18(5): 31118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M. 1974. “Self-Monitoring and Expressive Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30(4): 52637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M.. 1979. Self-Monitoring Processes,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Berkowitz, L., vol. 12. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., and Koch, G. C.. 2000. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System, 2nd ed. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Strudler, A. 1995. “On the Ethics of Deception in Negotiation,” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(4): 80522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. E. 1987. “The Definition of a Lie: An Examination of the Folk Models Underlying a Semantic Prototype,” in Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. Holland, D. and Quinn, N., 4366. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. Bundy, R. and Flament, C. 1971. “Social Categorization and Inter-Group Behavior,” European Journal of Social Psychology 1: 14978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E., and Crocker, J.. 1981. “Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing,” in Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, ed. Higgins, E. T. Herman, C. P. and Zanna, M. P., vol. 1, pp. 89134. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, J. T., ed. 1981. Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E. 1998. “Misrepresentation and Expectations of Misrepresentation in an Ethical Dilemma: The Role of Incentives and Temptation,” Academy of Management Journal 41(3): 33039.Google Scholar
Titus, R. M., and Grover, A. R.. 2001. “Personal Fraud: The Victims and the Scams,” Crime Prevention Studies 12: 13351.Google Scholar
Toby, J. 1952. “Some Variables in Role Conflict Analysis,” Social Forces 30: 32327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model,” Academy of Management Review 11(3): 60117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K.. 1992. “Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-Unethical Behavior in Organizations,” Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2): 12136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. E., Edgely, C., and Olmstead, G.. 1975. “Information Control in Conversation: Honesty Is Not Always the Best Policy,” Kansas Journal of Sociology 11: 6989.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B. 1995. “Strategic and Informational Barriers to Negotiation,” in Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. K. J. Arrow, R. H. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, and R. B. Wilson, 10819. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Yagil, D. 1998. “Charismatic Leadership and Organizational Hierarchy: Attribution of Charisma to Close and Distant Leaders,” Leadership Quarterly 9(2): 16176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyglidopoulos, S. C., and Fleming, P. J.. 2008. “Ethical Distance in Corrupt Firms: How Do Innocent Bystanders Become Guilty Perpetrators?,” Journal of Business Ethics 78(12): 26574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Lying: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Situational Factors
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Lying: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Situational Factors
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Lying: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Situational Factors
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *