Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-phmbd Total loading time: 0.351 Render date: 2022-07-04T13:19:33.184Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The good, the bad, or the ugly? Corporate strategies, size, and environmental regulation in the fish-farming industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2019

Abstract

This article investigates corporate responses to environmental regulation of fish farming in Norway, the world's largest producer and exporter of salmon. We note a puzzling strategic divergence within the industry: whereas small firms have strongly opposed new standards, large and multinational firms have supported or even demanded stricter regulation. Traditional models for business response strategies can explain this divergence only partly. We develop a supplementary, explanatory perspective focusing on company size and predatory opportunities, to show how large and dominant corporate players can use environmental regulation strategically to strengthen their competitive advantages at the expense of small and weaker rivals. This highlights a neglected dimension of regulatory effects and motives behind corporate demand for strict and costly standards. It aso shows how environmental regulations may cause trade-offs with local development concerns, relevant to other natural resource-based sectors evolving from smaller-scale production towards full-fledged industrialization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2019 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambec, S., Cohen, M.A., Elgie, S., and Lanoie, P.. 2011. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. L., Asche, F., and Garlock, T.. 2018. “Globalization and Commoditization: The Transformation of the Seafood Market.” Journal of Commodity Markets 12: 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragon-Correa, J.A., and Sharma, S.. 2003. “A Contingent Resource-Based View of the Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy.” Academy of Management Review 28 (1): 7188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asche, F. 2012. Green Growth in Fisheries and Aquaculture Production and Trade. Contribution to OECD Synthesis Report on Green Growth.Google Scholar
Bartel, A.P., and Thomas, L.G.. 1987. “Predation through Regulation: The Wage and Profit Effects of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency.” Journal of Law and Economics 30 (3): 239–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, R., Connell, L., and Flynn, A.. 1998. “Company Size, Environmental Regulation and Ecological Modernization: Further Analysis at the Level of the Firm.” Business Strategy and the Environment 7: 285–96.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, M.A., and Rondinelli, D.A.. 1998. “Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution.” Academy of Management Perspectives 12 (2): 3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, S.W. 2013. Principles of Sustainable Aquaculture: Promoting Social, Economic and Environmental Resilience. New York: Earthscan/ Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairncross, F. 1992. Costing the Earth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C. 2018. The Politics of Aquaculture: Sustainability Interdependence, Territory and Regulation and Fish Farming. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D., McLaughlin, P.A., and Richards, T.. 2018. Regulation, Entrepreneurship, and Firm Size. Mercatus Working Paper. Arlington, VA: George Mason University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R.M., and March, J.G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dean, T.J., Brown, R.L., and Stango, V.. 2000. “Environmental Regulation as a Barrier to the Formation of Small Manufacturing Establishments: A Longitudinal Examination.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40: 5675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, M.A., Hoffman, V.H., and Kuss, M.. 2011. “Under the Tip of the Iceberg: Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage.” Business and Society 50 (1): 116–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, M.A., and Toffel, M.W.. 2008. “Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (10): 1027–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D., and Winston, A.S. 2006. Green to Gold: How Smart Companies Use Environmental Strategy to Innovate, Create Value and Build Competitive Advantage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. 2008. Business Power and Conflict in International Environmental Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C., Guttormsen, A.G., and Smith, M.D.. 2016. Disease Risk and Market Structure in Salmon Aquaculture. Water Economics and Policy 2 (3): 1650015.Google Scholar
Gravelle, H., and Rees, R.. 1981. Microeconomics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Greaker, M. 2018. “Innovation in Natural Resource Sectors: A Case Study of Aquaculture.” Paper presented at the national meeting of Norwegian economists, Norway, January 2018.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert, and Thornton, Dorothy. 2003. Shades of Green: Business Regulation and the Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guttman, J.S., Sierck, A.W., and Friedland, D.M.. 1992. “The New Clean Air Act's Big Squeeze on America's Manufacturing Base.” Business Horizons 35 (2): 3740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, A., Hermansen, Ø., Nystøyl, R., and Junge Hess, E.. 2017. Cost Development in Farming of Norwegian Salmon. Report 24/7. Nofima og Kontali Analyse. Tromsø: Nofima.Google Scholar
Henriques, Irene, and Sadorsky, Perry. 1995. “The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersoug, B., Mikkelsen, E., and Karlsen, K.M. 2019. “'Great Expectations’ – Allocating Licenses with Special Requirements in Norwegian Salmon Farming.” Marine Policy, 100: 152–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Andrew. 2000. Competitive Environmental Strategy: A Guide to the Changing Business Landscape. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Holan, A.B., Roth, B., Breiland, M.S.W. (…) Espmark, Å.M. et al. 2017. Beste praksis for medikamentfrie metoder for lakseluskontroll (Best practice for non-medical methods to control sea lice). Nofima report, October 2017.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B., Peterson, S.R., Portney, P.R., and Stavins, R.N.. 1995. “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?Journal of Economic Literature 33: 132–63.Google Scholar
Kelsey, N. 2018. “Industry Type and Environmental Policy: Industry Characteristics Shape the Potential for Policymaking Success in Energy and the Environment.” Business and Politics 20 (4): 615–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennard, A. 2019. “The Enemy of My Enemy: When Firms Support Climate Regulation.” International Organization, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kolk, A., and Pinkse, J.. 2004. “Market Strategies for Climate Change.” European Management Journal 22 (3): 304–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontali Analyse, AS, 2018. The Salmon Farming Industry in Norway 2018. Kristiansund.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, A.B., Qviller, L., Helgesen, K.O., Vollset, K.W., Viljugrein, H., and Jansen, P.A.. 2018. “Quantitative Risk Assessment of Salmon Louse-induced Mortality of Seaward-migrating Post-smolt Atlantic Salmon.” Epidemics 23: 1933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, D., and Newell, P. 2005. The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luthman, O., Jonell, M., and Troell, M.. 2019. “Governing the Salmon Farming Industry: Comparison Between National Regulations and the ASC Salmon Standard.” Marine Policy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckling, J. 2015. “Oppose, Support, or Hedge? Distributional Effects, Regulatory Pressure, and Business Strategy in Environmental Politics.” Global Environmental Politics 15 (2): 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries, Norway (MTIF). 2014. Consultation paper to the Parliament on growth in Norwegian salmon and trout farming: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing--melding-til-stortinget-om-vekst-i-norsk-lakse--og-orretoppdrett/id2076332/?factbox=horingsnotater (accessed on 1 October 2018).Google Scholar
Mitnik, B.M. 1981. “The Strategic Uses of Regulation—and Deregulation.” Business Horizons 24 (2): 7183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, 2014. Seafood, Quarterly Preview. Oslo: Pareto Securities Equity Research.Google Scholar
Pashigan, P. 1984. “The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Optimal Plant Size and Factor Shares.” Journal of Law and Economics 27 (April): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, S. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. 1991. “America's Green Strategy.” Scientific American 264 (4): 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., and van der Linde, C.. 1995a. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment–Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 97118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., and van der Linde, C.. 1995b. “Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate.” Harvard Business Review 73 (5): 120–34.Google Scholar
Rugman, Alan M., and Verbeke, Alain. 1998. “Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework.” Strategic Management Journal 19 (4): 363–75.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, Alan M., and Verbeke, Alain. 2000. “Six Cases of Corporate Strategic Responses to Environmental Regulation.” European Management Journal 18 (4): 377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, C.M. 1997. “Environmental Regulation and Firm-Level Innovation: The Moderating Effects of Organizational- and Individual-level Variables.” Business and Society 36 (2): 140–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. 2000. “Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 681–97.Google Scholar
Sharma, S., and Vredenburg, H.. 1998. “Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 19: 729–53.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, P. 1995. “Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal 16: 183200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A. 1976. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, third edition. London: The Free Press/Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skjærseth, J.B., and Eikeland, P.O. (eds.) 2013. Corporate Responses to EU Emissions Trading: Resistance, Innovation or Responsibility? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svåsand, T., Grefsrud, E.S., Karlsen, Ø, Kvamme, B.O., Glover, K.S., Husa, V., and Kristiansen, T.S. (eds.) 2017. Risikorapport for norsk fiskeoppdrett 2017. Fisken og havet, special issue 2.Google Scholar
Teece, D.J. 2007. “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A.. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–33.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L.G. 1990. “Regulation and Firm Size: FDA Impacts on Innovation.” The RAND Journal of Economics 21 (4): 497517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vormedal, I. 2017. “Corporate Strategies in Environmental Governance: Marine Harvest and Regulatory Change for Sustainable Aquaculture.” Environmental Policy and Governance 27 (1): 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vormedal, I., and Gulbrandsen, L.H.. 2018. “Business Interests in Salmon Aquaculture Certification: Competition or Collective Action?Regulation and Governance. doi: 10.1111/rego.12213.Google Scholar
Walley, N., and Whitehead, B.. 1994. “It's Not Easy Being Green.” Harvard Business Review. doi: 10.1145/2342356.2342398.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The good, the bad, or the ugly? Corporate strategies, size, and environmental regulation in the fish-farming industry
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The good, the bad, or the ugly? Corporate strategies, size, and environmental regulation in the fish-farming industry
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The good, the bad, or the ugly? Corporate strategies, size, and environmental regulation in the fish-farming industry
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *