Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T03:41:03.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A bactrian god

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Nicholas Sims-Williams
Nicholas Sims-Williams
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Kushan god μοζδοοανο is attested on a group of rare coins of Kanishka I, where he is depicted as a bearded male bearing a trident in his right hand and riding a two-headed horse. It has been universally assumed that the name μοζδοοανο is connected in some way with that of Ahura Mazda, the supreme deity of the Zoroastrian religion, the second element of the Bactrian form being generally interpreted as an epithet meaning ‘victorious’.

Type
Notes and communications
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 336 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rosenfield, J. M., The dynastic arts of the Kushans (Berkeley, 1967), 82–83;Google ScholarGöbi, R., System und Chronologie der Münzprägung des Kušānreiches (Wien, 1984), 42 and pl. 167.Google Scholar

2 So far as I know, this etymology was first proposed by Duchesne-Guillemin, J., Paideuma, VII, 1960, 213–214.Google Scholar

3 Humbach, H., Mithraic Studies, I, (ed.) Hinnells, J. R. (Manchester, 1975), 139Google Scholar, followed by Davary, G. Dj., Baktrisch: ein Wörterbuch auf Grund der Inschriften, Handschriften, Münzen und Siegelsteine (Heidelberg, 1982), 234.Google Scholar

4 Sims-Williams, N. and Cribb, J. ‘A new Bactrian inscription of Kanishka the Great’, Silk Road Art and Archaeology, IV, [1995–]1996, 75–142.Google Scholar

5 The name of Ahura Mazda appears here in a more archaic spelling than the ωορομοζδο attested a generation later on a coin of Huvishka (the authenticity of which is doubtful according to Humbach, art. cit., 139–40). Forms such as ωυρομοζδο, ωορμοζδο ωορμοζδο, attested in the Kushano-Sasanian period (as a personal rather than a divine name) probably represent MP ō(h)rmuzd. In my edition of the text I contemplated an alternative reading αθρο μοζδο, which could be understood as ‘Fire (son) of Mazda’, cf. Av. ātarš ahurahe mazdā ‘Fire (son) of Ahura Mazda’, but it is highly doubtful whether this pregnant use of the genitive would have survived into Bactrian.

6 Gershevitch, I., TPS, 1969, 174Google Scholar, and apud Hallock, R. T., Persepolis fortification tablets (Chicago, 1969), 732.Google Scholar

7 Rather than from *mazišakī- as previously proposed (Sims-Williams, N.Proceedings of the first European Conference of Iranian Studies, 1, (ed.) Gnoli, Gh. and Panaino, A. (Rome, 1990 [1991]), 292–294).Google ScholarI have discussed the phonological details of the new etymology in a contribution to Emmerick, R. E., Studies in the vocabulary of Khotanese, III, Vienna, 123–124 (forthcoming).Google Scholar

8 Kuiper, F. B. J., Acta Orientalia, XII, 1934, 234;Google ScholarWackernagel, J. and Debrunner, A., Altindische Grammatik, II/2 (Göttingen, 1954), 910.Google Scholar

9 Leumann, E., Zur nordarischen Sprache und Literatur (Strassburg, 1912), 72.Google Scholar

10 Emmerick, R. E., Saka grammatical studies (London, 1968), 338Google Scholar, referring to Hoffmann, K., ‘Ein grundsprachliches Possessivsuffix’, MSS, VI, 1955, 35–40.Google Scholar

11 For the simplification of the cluster *ḍv in mäḍe < *mä (ṣ)ḍve cf. naḍe < *nṛtāwāh, nom. sg. of nadaun- < *nrtāwan- ‘man’.

12 cf. Emmerick, op. cit., 337. The secondary addition of *-h to the nom. sg. m. is also found in Khot. -r-stems, e.g. päte ‘father’ < *pitā-h. Its function was perhaps to characterize these forms more clearly as masculines.

13 See further Wackernagel-Debrunner, , op. cit., 894, 903–905;Google ScholarSchindler, J., Investigationes philologicae et comparativae: Gedenkschrift für Heinz Kronasser, (ed.) Neu, E. (Wiesbaden, 1982), 200–201.Google Scholar

14 Emmerick, op. cit., 347–8.

15 cf. the OP gen. sg. Auramazdāha, as explained by Kuiper, F. B. J., On Zarathustra's language (Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde, N. R., XLI/4), (Amsterdam, 1978), 7:Google Scholar gen. ending *-ah secondarily added to disambiguate the nom./gen. in *-ah.

16 Conversely, the GAv. nom. sg. may be due to influence of . See Bartholomae, C., Grundriss der iranischen Philologie, 1, (ed.) Geiger, W. and Kuhn, E. (Strassburg, 1895), 118.Google Scholar

17 See Humbach, H., onumentum H. S. Nyberg, I (Acta Iranica, IV), Tehran-Liège, 1975, 402–408.Google Scholar As Frantz Grenet has pointed out to me, one of the problems to be confronted is the fact that both οηϸο and μοζδοοανο are depicted on coins belonging to the same (third) emission of Kanishka.

18 This last point too I owe to Frantz Grenet. Humbach, art. cit., 405, suggests that the third face of wyšprkr may correspond to a third ‘neutral’ aspect of the god.