Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:47:31.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An introduction to Caodaism II. Beliefs and Organization1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

The religion of Cao-Dai is fundamentally, and deliberately, syncretic. Since it includes Christ and Moses (but for some reason, not Muhammad) in its pantheon, the Western student might be tempted to see it as essentially an attempt to bridge the gulf between East and West by finding a sort of middle way between Christianity and Buddhism. It is possible that some Caodaists who have acquired a thorough Western education in France but maintained their religious belief do in fact see it in those terms, but most of the Caodaist literature indicates that the real basis of the syncretism is an attempt to bring together the three religions of the Sino-Vietnamese tradition. In this attempt, Christianity has only a peripheral position, and nothing has been adopted from Christian teachings that would seriously clash with the underlying doctrinal tolerance of East Asian religions. The most important feature of Caodaist syncretism is that it brings together elements of Taoist spirit-mediumship with a concept of salvation that was originally Buddhist. If any one of the three Sino-Vietnamese religions may be said to be dominant in Caodaism it is religious Taoism; but since the Caodaists themselves frequently refer to their religion as ‘reformed Buddhism’, that is a point which must be demonstrated rather than taken for granted. I propose to analyse some of the most obvious elements of Caodaism under four headings: spirit-mediumship; the Cao-Dai and other spirits; salvation and the apocalyptic aspect; and hierarchy and organization. A concluding section will deal briefly with the possible relationship between Caodaism and certain religious sects in China.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 1 am very much indebted to conversations with Dr. Marjorie Topley and Mr. Michael Saso for several of the ideas followed up in the present article; neither of them, however, should be held responsible for any particular statement herein, save where directly acknowledged; still less for any errors.

3 The word spiritism will be used here merely because it was preferred by the French spiritists, with whom th e Caodaists ha d much closer contacts (and more in common) tha n with Anglo-Saxon ‘spiritualists’.

4 cf. Kardec, Allan (L. H. D. Rivail), Oeuvres posthumes, Paris, 1912Google Scholar, which includes a bio-graphical memoir reprinted from Revue Spirite, mai 1869; and Kardec, Allan (L. H. D. Rivail), The spirits' book, translated with an introduction by Blackwell, Anna, London, 1875Google Scholar.

5 J. J. M. de Groot, The religious system of China, repr., Taipei, 1964, vi, 1310.

6 Elliott, A. J. A., Chinese spirit-medium cults in Singapore, London, 1955, 140–5Google Scholar.

7 Ching-tzu, Wu, The scholars, English translation, Peking, 1964, 126ffGoogle Scholar.

8 Grootaers, W. A., ‘Une s⋯ance de spiritisme dans vme religion secr⋯te ⋯ P⋯king en 1948’ Mélanges Chinois el Bouddhiques, ix, 19481951, 92–8Google Scholar.

9 For all these Vietnamese terms, see, e.g. õĐng-Tᾰn, , Lich-sὐ Cao-õ⋯⋯, i. Phãn Vô–Vi, S⋯ig⋯n, 1967, referred to subsequently as Lich-sủc, 53ffGoogle Scholar.

10 ibid., 53, 129 ff.

11 Huỳnh-Minh, , Cãn-Tho xua và nay, Gia-Đ Ðịah, 1966, 222Google Scholar.

12 Mạnh, Phan Tru'o'ng, La voie du salut caodaïque, S⋯igon, 1950, 48Google Scholar.

13 Lịch-sứ, 57.

14 Gobron, G., History and philosophy of Caodaism, Sàigòn, 1950, 135, 124Google Scholar.

15 Lich-sứ, 57–8; Gouvernement-Général de l'lndochine, Contribution ⋯ I'histoire des mouvements politiques de I'Indochine française VII, Hànộ, 1934Google Scholar, referred to subsequently as Contribution, VII, 54–5.

16 Gobron, , op. cit., 46, 51 ff.Google Scholar; Contribution, VII, 58–9.

17 cf.supra, p. 576.

18 Nguyễgn Ph⋯t Tän, , A modern history of Viet-Nam, Sáigòn, 1964, 410–22Google Scholar.

19 Gobron, , op. cit., 26, 31 ffGoogle Scholar.

20 ibid., 149 ff.

21 Waley, Arthur, The poetry and career of Li Po (701–762), London, 1950, 7, 29–31Google Scholar.

22 Mạnh, Phan Triro'ng, La voie du salut, 101–4Google Scholar.

23 Lịch-sừ, 43, 58.

24 Contribution, VII, 27.

25 Gobron, , op. cit., 19Google Scholar .

26 Lịch-sừ:, 59 ff.

27 Gobron, , op. cit., 21Google Scholar .

28 Nguyễn Trung Hậu, , Lu'ậc-sử Ðạo Cao-Ðài: A short history of Caodaism, Tourane, 1956, 8Google Scholar . The word viết is here the Vietnamese form of the Chinese yüeh, meaning ‘to say’, ‘namely’.

29 Lịch-sừ, 81–2; cf. BSOAS, XXXIII, 2, 1970, 349Google Scholar.

30 cf. BSOAS, XXXIII, 2, 1970, 341Google Scholar.

31 Mạnh, Phan Tru'o'ng, La voie du salut, 50–8Google Scholar; it is worth noticing that Dr. Topley found the pattern of three Buddhas in the sects she studied in Singapore, but with Dipankara in place of Amitābha, , BSOAS, XXVI, 2, 1963, 371Google Scholar.

32 Hickey, G. C., Village in Vietnam, New Haven, 1964, 69, 71Google Scholar.

33 For this comparison, and information about the Taoist San Ch'ing (Tam-Thúnh), I am indebted to Mr. Saso.

31 Revue Caodaique, III e An., 12 1950, 6792Google Scholar.

35 Hậu, Trung, op. cit., 1011Google Scholar.

36 Topley, M. D., The organization and social function of Chinese women's chai-t'ang in Singapore (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1958), 131Google Scholar.

37 Hậu, Trung, op. cit., 1719Google Scholar.

38 Gobron, , op. cit., 153 ifGoogle Scholar.

39 Nguy ên Hậu, Trung D⋯c Gia⋯-To'ng, Nguyễn Ngoc Tu'o'ang, S⋯ig⋯n, 1958, referred to subsequently as NNT, 19 ffGoogle Scholar.

40 National Geographic Magazine, cxx, 4, 1961, 464–5Google Scholar.

41 Hậu, Trung, op. cit., 18Google Scholar.

42 Gobron, , op. cit., 154Google Scholar.

43 NNT, 19; he belonged to the Ngọc division.

44 Hậu, Trung, op. cit., 18Google Scholar.

45 Gobron, , op. cit., 156–7Google Scholar.

46 ibid., 157–8.

47 Hậu, Trung, op. cit., 19Google Scholar.

48 Gobron, , op. cit., 71Google Scholar.

49 NNT, 31.

50 Shuang, Hou Su, Important points of Tao Yuan at a glance, Singapore, 1932Google Scholar; I am grateful to Dr. Topley for drawing my attention to this source.

51 Topley, Marjorie, ‘The Great Way of Former Heaven: a group of Chinese secret religious sects’, BS0A8, XXVI, 2, 1963, 362–92Google Scholar; the subject is treated more fully in her unpublished thesis cited above, p. 581, n. 36.

52 cf. BSOAS, XXXIII, 2, 1970, 345–6Google Scholar.

53 J. J. M. de Groot, Sectarianism and religious persecution in China, repr., Taipei, 1963, I, ch. vi–vii.

54 Muramatsu, Y., ‘Some themes in Chinese rebel ideologies’, in Wright, A. F. (ed.), The Confucian persuasion, Stanford, 1960, 246–8Google Scholar.

55 Shih, Vincent Y. C., ‘Some Chinese rebel ideologies’, Taxing- Poo, XLIV, 1–3, 1956, 150226Google Scholar.

56 Hậu, Trung, op. cit., 21 ff.Google Scholar, deals at some length with the mission to establish Caodaism in central Việt-Nam from 1937 onwards. There were also a few Caodaists in Hảiphong and possibly Hànội.

57 Durand, M., Technique et panthéon des médiums vietnamiennes, Paris, 1959Google Scholar.

58 cf. BSOAS, XXXIII, 2, 1970, 348–9Google Scholar.

59 According to a relative.