Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:55:07.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Neo-Aramaic dialect spoken by Jews from the region of Arbel (Iraqi Kurdistan)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Geoffrey Khan
Geoffrey Khan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aramaic-speaking Jewish communities used to be found in various towns and villages throughout north-eastern Iraq, north-western Iran and southern Turkey before the mass exodus of Iraqi Jewry to the state of Israel in 1950–51. In Iraq, the Aramaic speakers were found in an area that may be denned as the land lying above a line drawn on a map across the country through the towns of Musil and Kirkuk. Aramaic was not the first language of all Jews of the area. In the large towns of Musil, Kirkuk, Aqra, as well as Arbel, Arabic was the Jewish vernacular. In some villages the Jews spoke Kurdish as their first language. In Iran, Aramaic-speaking Jewish communities were found as far south as Kerend. The northern limits of the Jewish Aramaic area were formed by communities in the region of lake Van in southern Turkey and those around lake Urmia in north-west Iran (Hopkins, 1993: 62–4).

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 213 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Yaՙaqov, A. 1961. Qehillot Yehudey Kurdistan. Jerusalem: Kirjat Sepher.Google Scholar
Boyarin, D. 1978. ‘On the history of the Babylonian Jewish Aramaic reading traditions: the reflexes of *amarc; and *ā’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 37: 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarin, D. 1981. ‘An inquiry into the formation of the Middle Aramaic dialects’, in Arbeitman, Y. L. and Bomhard, A. R. (ed.), Bono Homini Donum: Essays in historical linguistics in memory of J. Alexander Kerns. (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4: Current issues in linguistic theory 16.) 2 parts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Part 2: 613–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. 1971. ‘Neo-Aramaic’, Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 12, cols. 948 51.Google Scholar
Duval, R. 1883. Les dialectes neo-araméens de Salamas. Textes sur I'élal actuel de la Perse el contes populaires, publiés avec une traduction française. Paris.Google Scholar
Duval, R. 1896. ‘Notice sur les dialectes néo-araméens’, Mémoires de la société de linguistique de Paris, 9: 125 35.Google Scholar
Fox, S. E. 1991. ‘The phonology and morphology of the Jilu dialect of Neo-Aramaic’, Journal of Afroasiatic Languages, 3: 35–57.Google Scholar
Fox, S. E. 1994. ‘The relationship of the eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 114: 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbell, I. 1964. ‘“Flat”words and syllables in Jewish East New Armaic of Persian Azerbaijan and the contiguous districts (a problem of multilingualism)’, in Rosen, H. B. (ed.), Studies in Egyptology and linguistics in honor of H. J. Polotsky. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 86–103.Google Scholar
Garbell, I. 1965b. ‘The impact of Kurdish and Turkish on the Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of the Persian Azerbaijan and the adjoining region’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 85: 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, G. 1992. ‘Aramaic perfects’, Israel Oriental Studies, 12: 113 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goshen-Gottstein, M. H. 1978. ‘The language of Targum Onqelos and the model of literary diglossia in Aramaic’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 37: 169 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidi, I. 1883. ‘Beiträge zur Kenntnis der neuaramäischen Fellihi-Dialektes’, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 37: 293 318.Google Scholar
Harviainen, T. 1983. ‘Diglossia in Jewish castern Aramaic’, Studia Orientalia, 55/2: 97–113.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R. 1969. ‘The morphology of the verb in Modern Syriac (Christian colloquial of Urmi)’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 89: 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, R. D. 1985. ‘The phonology of pharyngeals and pharyngealization in Pre-Modern Aramaic’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 104: 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, R. D. 1988. ‘The history of the Modern Aramaic pronouns and pronominal suffixes’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 108: 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, R. D. 1989. The syntax and semantics of verb morphology in Modern Aramaic: a Jewish dialect of Iraqi Kurdistan. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Hoberman, R. D. 1990. ‘Reconstructing Pre-Modern Aramaic morphology: the independent pronouns’, in Heinrichs, W. (ed.), Studies in Neo-Aramaic. (Harvard Semitic Studies.) Atlanta: Scholars Press, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, S. 1989. ‘A tale in the Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Naγada (Persian Azerbaijan)’, Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 12: 243–281.Google Scholar
Hopkins, S. 1989b. ‘Neo-Aramaic dialects and the formation of the preterite’, Journal of Semitic Studies, 37: 74–90.Google Scholar
Hopkins, S. 1993. ‘The Jews of Kurdistan in Eretz Israel and their language’ [in Hebrew], Peՙamim: Studies in Oriental Jewry, 56. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute, 50–74.Google Scholar
Jastrow, O. 1988. Der neuaramāische Dialekt von Hertevin (Provinz Siirt). (Semitica Viva, 3.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrossowitz.Google Scholar
Jastrow, O. 1990. ‘Personal and demonstrative pronouns in Central Neo-Aramaic: a comparative and diachronic discussion based on Tūrōyo and the Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialect of Hertevin’ in Heinrichs, W. (ed.), Studies in Neo-Aramaic.(Harvard Semitic Studies.) Atlanta: Scholars Press, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastrow, O. 1990b. Der arabische Dialekt der Juden von ՙ Aqra und Arbīl. (Semitica Viva, 5.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrossowitz.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, O. 1996. ‘Is Modern Hebrew the only “Indo-Europeanized” Semitic language? And what about Neo-Aramaic?’, Israel Oriental Studies, 16: 59–70.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, O. 1997. ‘Spirantization of t and d in Neo-Aramaic’ [in Hebrew], in Bar-Asher, M. (ed.), Massorot: studies in language traditions and Jewish languages 9/10/11. Gideon Goldenburg Festschrift. Jerusalem: Magnes, 527–544.Google Scholar
Khan, G. 1999. A grammar of Neo-Aramaic: the dialect of the Jews of Arbel. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutscher, Y. E. 1969. ‘Two “passive”constructions in Aramaic in the light of Persian’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic studies. Jerusalem, 132–351.Google Scholar
Maclean, A. J. 1895. Grammar of the dialects of vernacular Syriac. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macuch, R. 1976. Geschichte der spāt- und neusyrischen Literatur. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, J. 1956. ‘The pronunciation of res by the Jews of Babylonia;‘ [in Hebrew], Lěšonénu, 20 [1995–56], 47–49.Google Scholar
Mansour, J. 1957. ‘The Arabic dialect of the Jews of Baghdad and the pronunciation of Hebrew’, Journal of Jewish Studies, 8: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morag, S. 1960. ‘Seven letters with double pronunciation: BGDKPRT’, in Pirsumey ha-Hevra ha-Heqer ha-Miqra be-Yisra'el Sepher VIII, muggash li-khbod ha Professor N. H. Tur-Sinai, Jerusalem: Kirjat Sepher, 207–242.Google Scholar
Morag, S. 1964. ‘Biblical Aramaic in Geonic Babylonia’, in Rosen, H. B. (ed.), Studies in Egyptology and linguistics in honor of H. J. Polotsky. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 117–131.Google Scholar
Morag, S. 1981. ‘On the background of the tradition of Babylonian Aramaic in the Yemenite community’ [in Hebrew], in Morag, S. and Ben-Ami, I. (ed.), Studies in Geniza and Sephardi heritage presented to Shelomo Dov Goitein. Jerusalem: Magnes, 137–171.Google Scholar
Morag, S. 1988. Babylonian Aramaic: the Yemenite tradition, [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute.Google Scholar
Nöoldeke, T. 1868. Grammatik der neusyrischen Sprache am Urmia-See und in Kurdistan. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, T. 1883. Review of Duval (1883), Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 37: 598–609.Google Scholar
Pennacchietti, F. and Orengo, A.. 1995. ‘Neoaramaico, Curdo e Armeno: lingue a contatto’, Egitto e Vicino Oriente, 18: 221–233.Google Scholar
Polotsky, H. J. 1979. ‘Verbs with two objects in Modern Syriac (Urmi)’, Israel Oriental Studies, 9: 204–227.Google Scholar
al-Qirqisāaī, L. Nemoy (ed.). 1939–1945. Kitāab al-Anwār wa'l-marāqib. 5 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Rhétoré, J. 1912. Grammaire de la langue soureth ou chaldéen vulgaire selon le dialecte de la plaine de Mossoul et des pays adjacents. Mossoul: Imprimerie des Pères Dominicains.Google Scholar
Rivlin, Y. 1959. Shirat Yehudey ha-Targum. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.Google Scholar
Rossell, W. H. 1953. A handbook of Aramaic magical texts. (Shelton Semitic series, 2.) New Jersey: Department of Semitics of Shelton College.Google Scholar
Sabar, Y. 1975. ‘The impact of Israeli Hebrew on the Neo-Aramaic dialect of the Kurdish Jews of Zakho: a case of language shift’, Hebrew Union College Annual, 46: 489–508.Google Scholar
Sabar, Y. 1976. P∂šat Way∂hî B∂šallah: a Neo-Aramaic Midrash on B∂šallah (Exodus). Introduction, phonetic transcription, translation, notes and glossary. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sabar, Y. 1984. Homilies in the Neo-Aramaic of the Kurdistani Jews on the parashot Wayhi, Beshallah and Yitro. Edition, Hebrew translation and introduction [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Sachau, E. 1895. Skizze des Fellichi-Dialekts von Mosul, (Abhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.) Berlin: Verlag der K. Ak. der Wiss.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Socin, A. 1882. Die neu-aramaeischen Dialekte von Urmia bis Mosul. Texte und Übersetzung. Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Tal, A. 1975. The language of the Targum of the former prophets and its position within the Aramaic dialects. Tel Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
Tsereteli, K. G. 1961. ‘Abriβ der vergleichenden Phonetik der modernen assyrischen Dialekte’, in F. Altheim, Geschichte der Hunnen, Bd. 3. Berlin: De Gruyter, 218–266.Google Scholar
Tsereteli, K. G. 1977. ‘Zur Frage der Klassifikation der neuaramäischen Dialekte’, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 127: 244–253.Google Scholar