Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:02:39.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the accuracy of age-grading neotropical Phlebotomines by counting follicular dilatations: first laboratory experiments, using colonies of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabeira) and L. furcata (Mangabeira) (Diptera: Psychodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. D. Ready ,
R. Lainson ,
T. J. Wilkes  and
R. Killick-Kendrick
P. D. Ready
Affiliation:
The Wellcome Parasitology Unit, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Funda¸ão SESP, C.P. 3, Belém, 66.000—Pará, Brazil
R. Lainson
Affiliation:
The Wellcome Parasitology Unit, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Funda¸ão SESP, C.P. 3, Belém, 66.000—Pará, Brazil
T. J. Wilkes
Affiliation:
Department of Pure & Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science & Technology, London SW7 2AZ, UK
R. Killick-Kendrick
Affiliation:
Department of Pure & Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science & Technology, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Blind’ trials using laboratory-bred females that had completed 0–3 gonotrophic cycles showed that Polovodova's method of assessing parity, by noting the presence of follicular dilatations, is applicable to Lutzomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabeira) and L. furcata (Mangabeira). However, at the resolution of the techniques used, classification is limited to a simple division into nulliparous and parous flies. The presence of granules in the ovarian accessory glands was found to be an unreliable indicator of parity for both species.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 641 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gillies, M. T. & Wilkes, T. J. (1965). A study of the age-composition of populations of Anopheles gambiae Giles and A. funestus Giles in north-eastern Tanzania.—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilvard, E., Wilkes, T. J., Killick-Kendrick, R. & Rioux, J. A. (1980). Ecologie des leishmanioses dans le sud de Ia France. 15. Déroulement des cycles gonotrophiques chez Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921 et Phlebotornus mascittii Grassi, 1908 en Cévennes. Corollaire épidémiologique.—Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 55, 659–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. T. & Hertig, M. (1961). The rearing of Phlebotomus sandflies. II. Development and behavior of Panamanian sandflies in laboratory culture.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54, 764–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lainson, R. & Shaw, J. J. (1968). Leishmaniasis in Brazil: I. Observations on enzootic rodent leishmaniasis—incrimination of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabeira) as the vector in the lower Amazonian Basin.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 62, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. J. (1965). Internal structural features of some Central American phlebotomine sandflies—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 59, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. J., Lainson, R. & Shaw, J. J. (1970). Determination of parous rates in phlebotomine sandflies with special reference to Amazonian species.—Bull. ent. Res. 60, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ready, P. D., Lainson, R. & Shaw, J. J. (1983). Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XX. Prevalence of ”enzootic rodent leishmaniasis” (Leishmania mexicana amazonensis), and apparent absence of “pian bois” (Le. braziliensis guyanensis), in plantations of introduced tree species and in other non-climax forests in eastern Amazônia.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 77, 775–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, J. J. & Lainson, R. (1972). Leishmaniasis in Brazil: VI. Observations on the seasonal variations of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata in different types of forest and its relationship to enzootic rodent leishmaniasis (Leishmania mexicana amazonensis).—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 66, 709–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, R. D. (1974). Granule formation in the accessory glands of a laboratory strain of Lu. longipalpis (Diptera: Phlebotomidae) from Ceará State, Brazil.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 68, 171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, R. D. (1977). The colonization of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata (Diptera: Psychodidae), a vector of Leishmania, mexicana amazonensis in Brazil.—J. med. Entomol. 14, 469–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkes, T. J. & Rioux, J. A. (1980). The application of Polovodova's technique for the age determination of Phlebotomus (Larroussius) ariasi.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 119.Google Scholar
Wilkes, T. J., Guilvard, E, Killick-Kendrick, R. & Rioux, J. A. (in press). Ecology of leishmaniasis in the south of France. 2. Age composition and the gonotrophic cycle of a population of Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921 in the Cévennes.—Annls Parasit. hum. comp.Google Scholar