Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T23:49:01.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimated mortalities of the immature stages of Aedes cantans (Mg.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in a natural habitat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. H. Lakhani
Affiliation:
Biometrics Section, Natural Environment Research Council, 19 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8PY, England
M. W. Service
Affiliation:
The Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Department of Medical Entomology, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, England

Abstract

For three consecutive years the eggs, the immature stages and the emergent adults of Aedes cantans (Mg.) populations were sampled from a small woodland ditch in southern England with a view to constructing the life-table of the species. Estimates of the numbers of ‘viable’ eggs available for hatching and the size of the resultant adult population yielded an estimate of the probability of a ‘viable’ egg resulting in an adult. Estimating the mortality rates in different immature stages which occur simultaneously is known to be difficult. It was considered reasonable to rely on a generalised exponential survivorship model based on the assumption that the relative mortality rate during the duration of each instar of A. cantans is constant, but this rate may vary from instar to instar. The parameters of the model were estimated using experimental data on the duration and total incidences through regular sampling of different instars together with the estimate of the probability that a ‘viable’ egg would result in an adult. The survivorship picture thus obtained agreed closely with the survivorship pattern obtained using a graphical approach based on the construction of the stage-specific age distribution of the pre-adults, and then drawing a smooth curve through the age distribution to produce an approximation to the survivorship curve. Because mortality was similar in all three years, the three years' data were pooled to give estimates of the life-table parameters. These clearly showed that substantial population loss occurred in the first two larval instars of A. cantans.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspök, H. & Kunz, C. (1967). Untersuchungen über die Ökologie des Tahyna-virus.—Zentbl.Bakt. ParasitKde Abt I. Orig. 203, 124.Google Scholar
Dempster, J. P. (1956). The estimation of the number of individuals entering each stage during the development of one generation of an insect population.—J. Anim. Ecol. 25, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, J. P. (1961). The analysis of data obtained by regular sampling of an insect population.—J. Anim. Ecol. 30, 429432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1962). A method for estimating the effects of mortality on aphid populations.—J. Anim. Ecol. 31, 389396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. T. & Nielsen, A. T. (1953). Field observations on the habits of Aedes taeni-orhynchus.—Ecology 34, 141156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. & Hollick, F. S. L. (1944). Studies of wireworm populations. I. A census of wire-worms in pasture.—Ann. appl. Biol. 31, 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1968). A method for extracting mosquito eggs from soil samples taken from oviposition sites.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 62, 478480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1971 a). Feeding behaviour and host preferences of British mosquitoes.—Bull ent. Res. 60, 653661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1971 b). Studies on sampling larval populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 45, 169180.Google ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1973 a). Study of the natural predators of Aedes cantans (Meigen) using the precipitin test.—J. med. Ent. 10, 503510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1973 b). Mortalities of the larvae of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex and detection of predators by the precipitin test.—Bull ent. Res. 62, 359369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. (1962). Growth and regulation of animal populations.—184 pp. New York,Holt.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E., Murdie, G., Yasuno, M., Tonn, R. J. & Reader, P. M. (1972). Studies on the life budget of Aedes aegypti in Wat Samphaya, Bangkok, Thailand.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 46, 211226.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, I. M. (1950). The reactions of mosquito larvae to regular repetitions of shadows as stimuli.—Aust. J. scient. Res. (B). 3, 113123.Google Scholar
Tinsley, T. W., Robertson, J. S., Rivers, C. F. & Service, M. W. (1971). An iridescent virus of Aedes cantans in Great Britain.—J. invertebr. Pathol. 18, 427428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar