Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T11:47:46.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficiency of electric nets as sampling devices for tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M.J. Packer
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
John Brady*
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
*
Dr J. Brady, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK

Abstract

Video was used to provide objective measurements of the behaviour of tsetse around an electric net. Data were collected on: (1) the number and behaviour of flies which actively avoided the net; (2) the number and fate of flies which hit the net; (3) the distribution on the ground around the net of electrocuted flies. This allowed estimates to be made of net efficiency (=No. of flies sampled/No. sampled + No. escaped%). The three components of an electric net system (netting/grids, inverter-transformer (‘spark box’) and battery) were varied to determine the effect of each on efficiency: neither the condition (age) of the netting/grids nor the design or condition of the ‘spark boxes’ had a significant effect on efficiency, but efficiency was lower with partly-charged batteries than with fully-charged ones. When account was not taken of flies which behaviourally avoided the net, the best system had an efficiency of 55% (range 49–61%), (cf. a previous estimate of 94%); when the behavioural avoiders were included in the estimate the efficiency was only 46% (range 43–49%). The efficiency of the system is discussed in terms of the way the high voltage across the electric grid is generated, and also how it might affect interpretation of sample data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gibson, G & Brady, J. (1988) Flight behaviour of tsetse flies in host odour plumes: the initial response to leaving or entering odour. Physiological Entomoloy 13, 2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, J.W. (1980) Improved estimates of the efficiency of traps for Glossina morsitans Westwood and G. pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae), with a note on the effect of the concentration of accompanying host odour on efficiency. Bulletin of Entomological Research 70, 579587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torr, S.J. (1985) The susceptibility of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) to insecticide deposits on targets. Bulletin of Entomological Research 75, 451458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torr, S.J. (1988) Behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina) in host odour plumes in the field. Physiological Entomology 13, 467478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G.A. (1974) New field methods for studying the responses of tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) to hosts. Bulletin of Entomological Research 64, 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G.A. (1980) Flight as a factor in the host-finding behaviour of tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 70, 299307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G.A & Hall, D.R. (1985) The role of 1-octen-3-ol, acetone and carbon dioxide in the attraction of tsetse flies, Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae), to ox odour. Bulletin of Entomological Research 75, 209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G.A, Lovemore, D.F, Flint, S & Cockbill, G.F. (1988) Odour-baited targets to control tsetse flies, Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae), in Zimbabwe. Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 3149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnes, M.L. (1990) Responses of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and G. pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) to the skin secretions of oxen. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80, 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar