Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-2qt69 Total loading time: 0.425 Render date: 2022-08-11T02:20:45.303Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Investigation of secondary metabolites in bean cultivars and their impact on the nutritional performance of Spodoptera littoralis (Lep.: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2021

Parviz Shishehbor
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Seyed Ali Hemmati*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Seyed Ali Hemmati, Email: sa.hemmati@scu.ac.ir

Abstract

Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd) is globally recognized as a destructive polyphagous insect pest of various crops in the world. It is commonly managed by chemical pesticides, which can cause deleterious effects such as environmental pollution, toxicity to non-target organisms and the emergence of secondary pests. Hence, investigations into alternative pest control strategies such as the use of resistant host plant cultivar against S. littoralis is important. This study aimed to explore the nutritional performance of S. littoralis larvae in dependence on total anthocyanin, flavonoid, and phenol levels across 11 bean cultivars (Phaseolus and Vigna spp.) under laboratory conditions. The results revealed that the Mashhad cultivar accumulated the highest amount of total phenols (13.59 mg ml−1), whereas Yaghout and Arabi cultivars posed the lowest total phenols contents (1.80 and 1.90 mg ml−1, respectively). Across larval instars (third to sixth), the highest consumption index and relative consumption rate were recorded on the Mashhad cultivar. The lowest values of efficiency of conversion of ingested food and the efficiency of conversion of digested food of total larval instars were detected in the larvae which were reared on the Mashhad cultivar. Likewise, the lowest value of the index of plant quality (IPQ) was obtained in the Mashhad cultivar; however, IPQ was figured out at the highest level in the Arabi cultivar. Our findings show that the differential accumulation of secondary metabolites would change the nutritional quality of plants for S. littoralis. Based on the findings, the Mashhad cultivar may serve as a candidate for either integrated pest management or breeding programs aiming at controlling this pest.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A, Gorski, PM and Tallamy, DW (1999) Polymorphism in plant defense against herbivory: constitutive and induced resistance in Cucumis sativa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25, 22852304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, AA, Fishbein, M, Jetter, R, Salminen, JP, Goldstein, JB, Freitag, AE and Sparks, JP (2009) Phylogenetic ecology of leaf surface traits in the milkweeds (Asclepias spp.): chemistry, ecophysiology, and insect behavior. New Phytologist 183, 848867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appel, HM and Martin, MM (1992) Significance of metabolic load in the evolution of host specificity of Manduca sexta. Ecology 73, 216228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awmack, CS and Leather, SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azab, SG, Sadek, MM and Crailsheim, K (2001) Protein metabolism in larvae of the cotton leaf-worm Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its response to three mycotoxins. Environmental Entomology 30, 817823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, SD (1965) Resistance of plants to insects. Annual Review of Entomology 10, 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, MA and Bastrup-Spohr, L (2008) Phenylpropanoid metabolism induced by wounding and insect herbivory. In Schaller, A (ed.), Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory. New York: Springer Publisher, pp. 189213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernays, EA and Chapman, RF (1994) Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, DG, Brettany, BW, Ginnigle, JB and Tailor, LR (1997) The distribution and migration of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in relation to meteorology on Cyprus, interpreted from maps of pheromone trap samples. Bulletin of Entomological Research 64, 339363.Google Scholar
Chapman, RF (1998) The Insects: Structure and Function. London: Cambridge University Press, p. 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, GEA, Queiroz-Monici, KS, Reis, SMPM and Oliveira, AC (2006) Chemical composition, dietary fiber and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chemistry 94, 327330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvishzadeh, A (2014) Enzymatic activity of alpha-amylase in alimentary tract Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): characterization and compartmentalization. Arthropods 3, 138.Google Scholar
Dent, D (2000) Host plant resistance. In Dent, D (ed.), Insect Pest Management. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 123179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gacemi, A, Taibi, A, Abed, NEH, M'hammedi Bouzina, M, Bellague, D and Tarmoul, K (2019) Effect of four host plants on nutritional performance of cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Crop Protection 8, 361371.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A, Goufo, P, Barros, A, Domínguez-Perles, R, Trindade, H, Rosa, EA, Ferreira, L and Rodrigues, M (2016) Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), a renewed multipurpose crop for a more sustainable agri-food system: nutritional advantages and constraints. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96, 29412951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granito, M, Palolini, M and Perez, S (2008) Polyphenols and antioxidant activity of Phaseolus vulgaris stored under extreme conditions and processed. LWT-Food Science and Technology 41, 994999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, ME, Lamont, BB, Fairbanks, MM and Rafferty, CM (2007) Plant structural traits and their role in antiherbivore defence. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8, 157178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmankaya, M, Ceyhan, E, Çelik, AS, Sert, H, Kahraman, A and Özcan, MM (2016) Some chemical properties, mineral content and amino acid composition of cowpeas (Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi). Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 8, 111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatem, AE, Abdel-Samad, SSM, Saleh, HA, Soliman, MHA and Hussien, AI (2009) Toxicological and physiological activity of plant extracts against Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Boletín Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 35, 517531.Google Scholar
Haukioja, E, Ossipov, V and Lempa, K (2002) The interactive effects of leaf maturation and phenolics on consumption and growth of a geometrid moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 104, 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegazi, EM and Schopf, R (1984) The influence of temperature on consumption and utilization of artificial diet by Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidopt., Noctuidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 97, 321326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemati, SA, Naseri, B, Ganbalani, GN, Dastjerdi, HR and Golizadeh, A (2012) Effect of different host plants on nutritional indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of Insect Science 12, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemmati, SA, Takalloo, Z, Taghdir, M, Mehrabadi, M, Balalaei, S, Moharramipour, S and Sajedi, RH (2021) The trypsin inhibitor pro-peptide induces toxic effects in Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 171, 104730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesler, LS and Dashiell, KE (2011) Antixenosis to the soybean aphid in soybean lines. The Open Entomology Journal 5, 3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horber, E (1980) Types and classification of resistance. In Maxwell, FG and Jennings, PR (eds). Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects. New York: Wiley, pp. 1521.Google Scholar
Hwang, SY, Liu, CH and Shen, TC (2008) Effects of plant nutrient availability and host plant species on the performance of two Pieris butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36, 505513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, GR, Dicke, M and Hartley, SE (2012) The Ecology of Plant Secondary Metabolites: From Genes to Global Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, SM (2020) Effect of sublethal doses of some insecticides and their role on detoxication enzymes and protein-content of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bulletin of the National Research Centre 44, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoyama, K, Kawahira, Y, Murata, M and Tojo, S (1999) Fluctuations of some characteristics in the common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared under different diets. Applied Entomology and Zoology 34, 315321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johary, T, Dizadji, A and Naderpour, M (2016) Biological and molecular characteristics of bean common mosaic virus isolates circulating in common bean in Iran. Journal of Plant Pathology 98, 301310.Google Scholar
Kennedy, GG, Gould, F, Deponti, OMB and Stinner, RE (1987) Ecological, agricultural, genetic, and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm. Environmental Entomology 16, 327338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khafagi, WE, Hegazi, M and Neama, AA (2016) Effects of temperature on the development, food consumption and utilization parameters of the last two larval instars of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology 2, 9399.Google Scholar
Khedr, MA, AL-Shannaf, HM, Mead, HM and Shaker, SA (2015) Comparative study to determine food consumption of cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, on some cotton genotypes. Journal of Plant Protection Research 55, 312321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, DO, Chun, OK, Kim, YJ, Moon, HY and Lee, CY (2003) Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 516, 5096515.Google Scholar
Komatsu, K, Okuda, S, Takahashi, M and Matsunaga, R (2004) Antibiotic effect of insect-resistant soybean on common cutworm (Spodoptera litura) and its inheritance. Breeding Science 54, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koricheva, J and Haukioja, E (1992) Effects of air pollution on host plant quality, individual performance and population density of Eriocrania miners (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae). Environmental Entomology 21, 13861392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotkar, HM, Sarate, PJ, Tamhane, VS and Giri, AP (2009) Responses of midgut amylases of Helicoverpa armigera feeding on various host plants. Journal of Insect Physiology 55, 663670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koul, O, Singh, G, Sing, R and Singh, J (2004) Bioefficacy and mode-of-action some limonoids of salannin group from Azadirachtaindica A. Juss and their role in a multicomponent system against lepidopteran larvae. Journal of Biosciences 29, 409416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladhari, A, Laarif, A, Omezzine, F and Haouala, R (2013) Effect of the extracts of the spiderflower, Cleome arabica, on feeding and survival of larvae of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis. Journal of Insect Science 13, 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarevic, J and Peric-Mataruga, V (2003) Nutritive stress effects on growth and digestive physiology of Lymantria dispar larvae. Yugoslav Medical Biochemistry 22, 5359.Google Scholar
Le, TH, Lim, ES, Lee, SK, Choi, YW, Kim, YH and Min, J (2010) Effects of glyphosate and methidathion on the expression of the Dhb, Vtg, Arnt, CYP4 and CYP314 in Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 79, 6771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukasik, I, Kornacka, A, Goławska, S, Sytykiewicz, H, Sprawka, I and Wójcicka, A (2017) Effects of Acyrtosiphon pisum (Harris) infestation on the hydrogen peroxide content and activity of antioxidant enzymes in Fabaceae plants. Allelopathy Journal 40, 143150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthy, P and Wolfersberger, MG (2000) Pathogenesis of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. In Charles, JF, Decluse, A and Nielsen-LeRoux, C (eds), Entomopathogenic Bacteria: From Laboratory to Field Application. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 167168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machovsky-Capuska, GE, Senior, AM, Simpson, SJ and Raubenheimer, D (2016) The multidimensional nutritional niche. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 31, 355365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardani-Talaee, M, Zibaee, A, Nouri-Ganbalani, G, Rahimi, V and Tajmiri, P (2015) Effects of potato cultivars on some physiological processes of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 108, 23732382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardani-Talaee, M, Nouri-Ganblani, G, Razmjou, J, Hassanpour, M, Naseri, B and Asgharzadeh, A (2016) Effects of chemical, organic and bio-fertilizers on some secondary metabolites in the leaves of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) and their impact on life table parameters of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 109, 12311240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, WJ Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11, 119161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendiola-Olaya, E, Valencia-Jimenez, A, Valdes-Rodriguez, S, Delano-Frier, J and Blanco-Labra, A (2000) Digestive amylase from the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncates Horn. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – Part B 126, 425433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, SS, Chung, PG and Murugan, K (2005) Effect of biopesticides applied separately or together on nutritional indices of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica 33, 187195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, JL (2008) Insect Physiology and Biochemistry. London: CRC Press, pp. 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizzi, AR and Parra, JRP (2012) Insect Bioecology and Nutrition for Integrated Pest Management. New York: CRC Press, pp. 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereyra, PC and Sánchez, NE (2006) Effect of two solanaceous plants on developmental and population parameters of the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotropical Entomology 35, 671676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluschkell, U, Horowitz, AR, Weintraub, PG and Ishaaya, I (1998) DPX-MP062-a potent compound for controlling Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Pesticide Science 54, 8590.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretorius, LM (1976) Laboratory studies on the developmental reproductive performance of Helicoverpa armigera on various food plants. Journal of Entomological Society of South Africa 39, 337–334.Google Scholar
Price, PW, Denno, RF, Eubanks, MD, Finke, DL and Kaplan, I (2011) Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations and Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radwan, EH, Youssef, NS, Hashem, HO and Shalaby, AM (2019) The effects of Zanzalacht on the gonotrophic cycle of the adult house fly Musca domestica. Journal of Plants and Animal Ecology 1, 2339, 7.Google Scholar
Sarfraz, M, Dosdall, LM and Keddie, BA (2006) Diamondback moth-host plant interactions: implications for pest management. Crop Protection 25, 625636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, LA (1981) Consumer growth efficiencies: their limits and relationships to ecological energetics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 93, 805828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriber, JM and Slansky, F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 26, 183211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiq, M, Ravi, R and Dolan, KD (2010) Physical and functional characteristics of selected dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flour. LWT-Food Science and Technology 43, 232237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, MSJ (2003) Flavonoid-insect interactions: recent advances in our knowledge. Phytochemistry 64, 2130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slinkard, K and Singleton, VL (1997) Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 28, 4955.Google Scholar
Smith, CM (2005) Plant Resistance to Arthropods: Molecular and Conventional Approaches. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sogbesan, AO and Ugwumba, AAA (2008) Nutritive evaluation of termite (Macrotemes subhyalinus) as animal protein supplements in the in the diet of Heterobranchus longifilis (Valenciennes, 1840) fingerlings. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 8, 149157.Google Scholar
Soler, R, Van der Putten, WH, Harvey, JA, Vet, LEM, Dicke, M and Bezemer, TM (2012) Root herbivore effects on aboveground multitrophic interactions: patterns, processes and mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Ecology 38, 755767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, PC, Anderson, JC, Blaney, WM and Simmonds, MSJ (1993) Developmental inhibition of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) larvae by a novel caffeoylquinic acid from the wild ground, Arachis paraguariensis (Chodat & Hassl.). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 29172933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, MJ, Workman, KV, Bostock, RM and Duffey, SS (1998) Specificity of induced resistance in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Oecologia 113, 7481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulistyo, A and Inayati, A (2016) Mechanisms of antixenosis, antibiosis, and tolerance of fourteen soybean genotypes in response to whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci). Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity 17, 447453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, CJ, Harding, SA, Tschaplinski, TJ, Lindroth, RL and Yuan, YN (2006) Genome-wide analysis of the structural genes regulating defense phenylpropanoid metabolism in Populus. New Phytologist 172, 4762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenborre, G, Miersch, O, Hause, B, Smagghe, G, Wasternack, C and Van Damme, EJM (2009) Spodoptera littoralis induced lectin expression in tobacco. Plant Cell Physiology 50, 11421155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldbauer, GP (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 5, 229288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
War, AR, Paulraj, MG, War, MY and Ignacimuthu, S (2011 a) Jasmonic acid-mediated-induced resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 30, 512523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
War, AR, Paulraj, MG, War, MY and Ignacimuthu, S (2011 b) Herbivore- and elicitor-induced resistance in groundnut to Asian armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Plant Signaling & Behavior 6, 1769–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
War, AR, Paulraj, MG, Ahmad, T, Buhroo, AA, Hussain, B, Ignacimuthu, S and Sharma, HC (2012) Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7, 13061320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, J, Zhang, L, Yang, S, Xie, B, An, S and Liang, G (2018) Assessment of the lethal and sublethal effects by spinetoram on cotton bollworm. PLoS ONE 13, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Investigation of secondary metabolites in bean cultivars and their impact on the nutritional performance of Spodoptera littoralis (Lep.: Noctuidae)
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Investigation of secondary metabolites in bean cultivars and their impact on the nutritional performance of Spodoptera littoralis (Lep.: Noctuidae)
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Investigation of secondary metabolites in bean cultivars and their impact on the nutritional performance of Spodoptera littoralis (Lep.: Noctuidae)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *