Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:19:34.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The integration of cloning by nuclear transfer in the conservation of animal genetic resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

D.N. Wells*
Affiliation:
AgResearch, PB 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Cloning mammals from somatic cells by nuclear transfer has the potential to assist with the preservation of genetic diversity. An increasing number of species have been successfully cloned by this approach; however, present methods are inefficient with few cloned embryos resulting in healthy offspring. In those livestock species that have already been cloned, it is clearly feasible to use cloning to preserve endangered breeds (e.g. the last surviving Enderby Island cow). The opportunity exists to recover oocytes from these cloned heifers and use frozen Enderby Island sperm from deceased bulls for in vitro fertilisation and thus, expand the genetic diversity of this breed. Where there exists an adequate understanding of the reproductive biology and embryology of the species concerned and adequate sources of females to supply both recipient oocytes and surrogates to gestate the pregnancies, intra-specific nuclear transfer and embryo transfer can be utilised. However, when these requirements cannot be met, as is common for most endangered species, cloning technology invariably involves the use of inter-species nuclear transfer and embryo transfer. Even in intra-specific cloning the source of oocyte for nuclear transfer is an important consideration. Typically, cloned animals are only genomic copies of the founder if they possess mitochondrial DNA which differs from the original animal. Different maternal lineages of oocytes both within and between breeds significantly affect cloning efficiency and livestock production characteristics. Cloning should not distract conservation efforts from encouraging the use of indigenous livestock breeds with traits of adaptation to local environments, the preservation of wildlife habitats or the use of other forms of assisted reproduction. Whilst it is often difficult to justify cloning in animal conservation at present, the appropriate cryo-preservation of tissues and cells from a wide selection of biodiversity is of paramount importance. This provides an insurance against further losses of genetic variation from dwindling populations, disease epidemics or even possible extinction. It would also complement the gene banking of gametes or embryos and can be performed more easily and cheaply. Future cloning from preserved somatic cells can reintroduce lost genes back into the breeding pool. With greater appreciation of the heritable attributes of traditional livestock breeds there is the desire to identify superior animals within these local populations and the genetic loci involved. Through clonal family performance testing, nuclear transfer can aid the selection of desirable genotypes and then the production of larger numbers of embryos or animals for natural breeding to more widely disseminate the desirable traits. With the identification of alleles conferring desirable attributes, transgenesis could be utilised to both improve traditional and industrial livestock breeds. This further emphasizes the importance of preserving global farm animal genetic resources.

Type
Section 3: Reproductive techniques to support conservation
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G.B. 1988. Interspecific Pregnancy: barriers and prospects. Biology of Reproduction 38: 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, R. and King, T.J. 1952. Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs’ eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 38: 455463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brophy, B., Smolenski, G., Wheeler, T., Wells, D., L’Huillier, P. and Laible, G. 2003. Cloned transgenic cattle produce milk with higher levels of beta-casein and kappa-casein. Nature Biotechnology 21: 157162.Google Scholar
Campbell, K.H., McWhir, J., Ritchie, W.A. and Wilmut, I. 1996. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380: 6466.Google Scholar
Chen, D.Y., Wen, D.C., Zhang, Y.P., Sun, Q.Y., Han, Z.M., Liu, Z.H., Shi, P., Li, J.S., Xiangyu, J.G., Lian, L., Kou, Z.H., Wu, Y.Q., Chen, Y.C., Wang, P.Y. and Zhang, H.M. 2002. Interspecies implantation and mitochondria fate of panda-rabbit cloned embryos. Biology of Reproduction 67: 637642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collas, P. and Barnes, F.L. 1994. Nuclear transplantation by microinjection of inner cell mass and granulosa cell nuclei. Molecular Reproduction and Development 38: 264267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortvrindt, R. and Smitz, J. 2001. In vitro follicle growth: achievements in mammalian species. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 36: 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dominko, T., Mitalipova, M., Haley, B., Beyhan, Z., Memili, E., McKusick, B. and First, N.L. 1999. Bovine oocyte cytoplasm supports development of embryos produced by nuclear transfer of somatic cell nuclei from various mammalian species. Biology of Reproduction 60: 14961502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurdon, J.B. 1986. Nuclear transplantation in eggs and oocytes. Journal of Cell Science, Supplement 4: 287318.Google Scholar
Hammer, C.J., Tyler, H.D., Loskutoff, N.M., Armstrong, D.L., Funk, D.J., Lindsey, B.R. and Simmons, L.G. 2001. Compromised development of calves (Bos gaurus) derived from in vitro-generated embryos and transferred interspecifically into domestic cattle (Bos taurus). Theriogenology 55: 14471455.Google Scholar
Heyman, Y., Chavatte-Palmer, P., LeBourhis, D., Camous, S., Vignon, X. and Renard, J.P. 2002a. Frequency and occurrence of lategestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biology of Reproduction 66: 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyman, Y., Zhou, Q., Lebourhis, D., Chavatte-Palmer, P., Renard, J.P. and Vignon, X. 2002b. Novel approaches and hurdles to somatic cloning in cattle. Cloning Stem Cells 4: 4755.Google Scholar
Hill, J.R., Burghardt, R.C., Jones, K., Long, C.R., Looney, C.R., Shin, T., Spencer, T.E., Thompson, J.A., Winger, Q.A. and Westhusin, M.E. 2000. Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses. Biology of Reproduction 63: 17871794.Google Scholar
Hill, J.R., Roussel, A.J., Cibelli, J.B., Edwards, J.F., Hooper, N.L., Miller, M.W., Thompson, J.A., Looney, C.R., Westhusin, M.E., Robl, J.M. and Stice, S.L. 1999. Clinical and pathologic features of cloned transgenic calves and fetuses (13 case studies). Theriogenology 51: 14511465.Google Scholar
Lanza, R.P., Cibelli, J., Diaz, F., Moraes, C., Farin, P.W., Farin, C.E., Hammer, C.J., West, M.D. and Damiani, P. 2000. Cloning of an endangered species (Bos gaurus) using inter-species nuclear transfer. Cloning 2: 7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Van der Elst, J., Van den Broecke, R. and Dhont, M. 2001. Live offspring by in vitro fertilization of oocytes from cryopreserved primordial mouse follicles after sequential in vivo transplantation and in vitro maturation. Biology of Reproduction 64: 171178.Google Scholar
Loi, P., Ptak, G., Barboni, B., Fulka, J. Jr., Cappai, P. and Clinton, M. 2001. Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross-species nuclear transfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology 19: 962964.Google Scholar
Mannen, H., Kojima, T., Oyama, K., Mukai, F., Ishida, T. and Tsuji, S. 1998. Effect of mitochondrial DNA variation on carcass traits of Japanese Black cattle. Journal of Animal Science 76: 3641.Google Scholar
Meirelles, F.V., Bordignon, V., Watanabe, Y., Watanabe, M., Dayan, A., Lobo, R.B., Garcia, J.M. and Smith, L.C. 2001. Complete replacement of the mitochondrial genotype in a Bos indicus calf reconstructed by nuclear transfer to a Bos taurus oocyte. Genetics 158: 351356.Google Scholar
Muir, P.D., Semiadi, G., Asher, G.W., Broad, T.E., Tate, M.L. and Barry, T.N. 1997. Sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) x red deer (C. elaphus) interspecies hybrids. Journal of Heredity 88: 366372.Google Scholar
Nagao, Y., Totsuka, Y., Atomi, Y., Kaneda, H., Lindahl, K.F., Imai, H. and Yonekawa, H. 1998. Decreased physical performance of congenic mice with mismatch between the nuclear and the mitochondrial genome. Genes and Genetic Systems 73: 2127.Google Scholar
Nolch, G. 1999. Back from the dead. Australasian Science 20: 2829.Google Scholar
Oback, B. and Wells, D. 2002. Donor cells for nuclear cloning: many are called, but few are chosen. Cloning Stem Cells 4: 147168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obata, Y., Kono, T. and Hatada, I. 2002. Gene silencing: maturation of mouse fetal germ cells in vitro. Nature 418: 497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rideout, W.M. 3rd, Eggan, K. and Jaenisch, R. 2001. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science 293: 10931098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnieke, A.E., Kind, A.J., Ritchie, W.A., Mycock, K., Scott, A.R., Ritchie, M., Wilmut, I., Colman, A. and Campbell, K.H. 1997. Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science 278: 21302133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutz, M.M., Freeman, A.E., Lindberg, G.L., Koehler, C.M. and Beitz, D.C. 1994. The effect of mitochondrial DNA on milk production and health of dairy cattle Livestock Production Science 37: 283295.Google Scholar
Shitara, H., Kaneda, H., Sato, A., Inoue, K., Ogura, A., Yonekawa, H. and Hayashi, J.I. 2000. Selective and continuous elimination of mitochondria microinjected into mouse eggs from spermatids, but not from liver cells, occurs throughout embryogenesis. Genetics 156: 12771284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.C. and Wilmut, I. 1989. Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation. Biology of Reproduction 40: 10271035.Google Scholar
Steinborn, R., Schinogl, P., Wells, D.N., Bergthaler, A., Muller, M. and Brem, G. 2002. Coexistence of Bos taurus and B. indicus mitochondrial DNAs in nuclear transfer-derived somatic cattle clones. Genetics 162: 823829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R. 1999. Siberian mammoth find raises hopes, questions. Science 286: 876877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stover, J., Evans, J. and Dolensek, E.P. 1981. Inter-species embryo transfer from gaur to domestic Holstein. Proceedings of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, Seattle, Washington, USA. pp. 122123.Google Scholar
Summers, P.M., Shephard, A.M., Hodges, J.K., Kydd, J., Boyle, M.S. and Allen, W.R. 1987. Successful transfer of the embryos of Przewalski's horses (Equus przewalskii) and Grant's zebra (E. burchelli) to domestic mares (E. caballus). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 80: 1320.Google Scholar
Sutovsky, P., Moreno, R.D., Ramalho-Santos, J., Dominko, T., Simerly, C. and Schatten, G. 2000. Ubiquitinated sperm mitochondria, selective proteolysis, and the regulation of mitochondrial inheritance in mammalian embryos. Biology of Reproduction 63: 582590.Google Scholar
Vogel, G. 2001. Endangered species. Cloned gaur a short-lived success. Science 291: 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, D. 1999. Animal cloning provides many new opportunities for livestock production and biomedicine in the future. Agricultural Science 12 (3): 2227.Google Scholar
Wells, D.N. 2003. Cloning in livestock agriculture. In: Reproduction in Domestic Ruminants V, (Reproduction Supplement 61). Edited by Campbell, B.K., Webb, R., Dobson, H. and Doberska, C.. Society for Reproduction and Fertility, Cambridge, UK. pp. 131150.Google Scholar
Wells, D.N., Misica, P.M., Tervit, H.R. and Vivanco, W.H. 1998. Adult somatic cell nuclear transfer is used to preserve the last surviving cow of the Enderby Island cattle breed. Reproduction Fertility and Development 10: 369378.Google Scholar
White, K.L., Bunch, T.D., Mitalipov, S. and Reed, W.A. 1999. Establishment of pregnancy after the transfer of nuclear transfer embryos produced from the fusion of Argali (Ovis ammon) nuclei into domestic sheep (Ovis aries) enucleated oocytes. Cloning 1: 4754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willadsen, S.M. 1986. Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 320: 6365.Google Scholar
Wilmut, I., Beaujean, N., De Sousa, P.A., Dinnyes, A., King, T.J., Paterson, L.A., Wells, D.N. and Young, L.E. 2002. Somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature 419: 583587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A.E., McWhir, J., Kind, A.J. and Campbell, K.H. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385: 810813.Google Scholar
Wolvekamp, M.C., Cleary, M.L., Cox, S.L., Shaw, J.M., Jenkin, G. and Trounson, A.O. 2001. Follicular development in cryopreserved Common Wombat ovarian tissue xenografted to Nude rats. Animal Reproduction Science 65: 135147.Google Scholar
Wrenzycki, C., Wells, D., Herrmann, D., Miller, A., Oliver, J., Tervit, R. and Niemann, H. 2001. Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biology of Reproduction 65: 309317.Google Scholar