Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T21:53:37.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fermentable energy of concentrate foods estimated using four techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

S. Fakhri
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation and Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Drayton, Stratford-upon-Avon, CV37 9RQ Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 6AT
A. R. Moss
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation and Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Drayton, Stratford-upon-Avon, CV37 9RQ
D.I. Givens
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation and Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Drayton, Stratford-upon-Avon, CV37 9RQ
E. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 6AT
Get access

Extract

Fermentable energy (FE) was defined in the latest United Kingdom metabolizable protein system as energy available for microbial protein growth and multiplication in the rumen (Agricultural and Food Research Council, 1992). In this system the FE value was calculated by subtracting the metabolizable energy (ME) of fat and ME of any fermentation products from the ME of the food. This estimation is indirect and largely based on whole tract digestion data, thus it can not take into account the influence of rumen outflow, fermentation and degradation rate and digesta retention time in the rumen. In addition, this approach does not take into account undegradable protein and /or starch. As a result, the precision of the FE values are questionable. Therefore a precise, accurate, rapid, cheap and direct technique to measure FE from food ingredients should be developed. Such a technique should consider the factors mentioned above. This work evaluated the ability of four techniques to estimate the FE value of concentrate foods for ruminants.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report no. 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 787835 Google Scholar
Cone, J. W. 1994. A new automated gas production method for the in vitro study of fermentation kinetics in rumen fluid using pressure transducers and electric gas valves. Proceedings of the Society of Nutrition and Physiology 3: 182.Google Scholar
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R. and Isaac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 163: 99111.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. 1981. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96: 251252.Google Scholar
Moss, A. R., Fakhri, S., Givens, D. I. and Owen, E. 1998. Effect of fat content on degradability and fermentability of concentrate foods in situ, in vitro and with gas production technique. In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants (ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., Huntington, J. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 212214. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22.Google Scholar
Weisbjerg, M. R., Bhargava, P. K. and Hvelplund, T. A. 1990. Use of degradation curves in feed evaluation (translated version). In Report from the National Institute of Animal Science, Denmark (Beretning Fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsføg, Denmark).Google Scholar