Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-22T22:52:21.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive performance during early pregnancy in cattle with contrasting early pregnancy rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

W.H McMillan*
AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
A J. Peterson
AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
S.F. Cox
AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
S.J. Pearson
AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
M.J. Donnison
AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
*Current address: Livestock Improvement Corporation, Private Bag 3016, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access


Causes of variation amongst cattle within a herd in their ability to initiate and maintain pregnancy are largely unknown. An experimental animal resource has recently been established to understand the biology of early reproductive performance. This paper summarises the results achieved during the establishment phase and from several experiments aimed at determining the physiological basis of the difference between sub-herds of contrasting pregnancy rates on Day 60. Each of 155 contemporary yearling heifers received 2 in vitro-produced embryos on 6 separate occasions during a 26-month period. Sixty days after transfer, pregnancy and twinning rates were determined ultrasonically, pregnancies terminated and the process repeated. The interval between successive transfers was greater than 100 days. Heifers were ranked on their aggregate pregnancy rate performance after 6 rounds of transfer, and the highest (High) and lowest (Low) 25 were retained. Differences in reproductive performance during the establishment phase of the herd are reported. In addition, several subsequent experiments examined ovarian follicle turnover and progesterone levels during an oestrous cycle, early embryo development after either AI or embryo transfer, and protein, interferon tau and ubiquitin-cross-reactive protein levels in uterine luminal flushings.Pregnancy rates were 7-folder higher in the High sub-herd (76 vs. 11%), with much of this difference apparent by Day 25. The proportion of heifers observed in standing oestrus prior to embryo transfer and the interval from the end of synchronisation treatment to the onset of oestrus were similar in the sub-herds. Oestrous cycle length, ovarian follicular dynamics and progesterone profiles during the oestrous cycle were also similar. More conceptuses had elongated by Day 14 in the High sub-herd (67 vs. 14%, P<0.05), which also tended to have a higher pregnancy rate after artificial insemination (52 vs. 29, P<0.1). Total protein in flushings from the uterus was similar in the sub-herds on Day 14 and Day 17. Conceptuses in the High sub-herd were longer on Day 17 following embryo transfer (6.5 vs. 4.8, P<0.05). Interferon-tau levels were higher in the High sub-herd (25.9 vs. 16.1, P<0.01), although ubiquitin cross-reactive protein levels were also higher in the High sub-herd, but this difference just failed to reach significance. We conclude that: 1. Most of the difference in sub-herd pregnancy rate occurs within 3 weeks of ET; 2. Ovarian factors are unlikely to contribute to the difference; 3. Major differences occur after blastocyst hatching and probably depend upon a differing endometrial environment before Day 14; 4. Differences in the ability of the uterine milieu to stimulate the expression of interferon-tau may be responsible for the differences in pregnancy rate; 5. The two sub-herds are a unique experimental resource for understanding early pregnancy in cattle following either AI or ET.

Offered Theatre Papers
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ayalon, N. 1978. A review of embryonic mortality in cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54: 483493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazer, F.W., Ott, T.L. and Spencer, T.E. 1994. Pregnancy recognition in ruminants, pigs and horses: signals from the trophoblast. Theriogenology 41: 7994.Google Scholar
Broadbent, P.J., Stewart, M. and Dolman, D.F. 1991. Recipient management and embryo transfer. Theriogenology 35: 125139.Google Scholar
Coleman, D.A., Dailey, R.A., Leffel, R.E. and Baker, R.D. 1987. Estrous synchronization and establishment of pregnancy in bovine embryo transfer recipients. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 858866.Google Scholar
Cox, S.F., McMillan, W.H. and Donnison, M.J. 1998. Establishment of a herd with divergent potential pregnancy rate. Theriogenology 49: 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasler, J.F., McCauley, A.D., Lathrop, and W.F., , Foote, R.H. 1987. Effect of donor-embryo recipient interactions on pregnancy rate in a large-scale bovine embryo transfer program. Theriogenology 41: 139168.Google Scholar
Lu, K.H. and Polge, C. 1992. A summary of two years results in large-scale in vitro bovine embryo production. Proceedings of 12th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, August 23–27, 1992, The Hague, The Netherlands, pages 1311317.Google Scholar
McMillan, W.H. 1996 Calving performance after embryo transfer-induced twinning - a summary of 30 studies. Proceedings of New Zealand Society Animal Production 56: 358361.Google Scholar
McMillan, W.H. 1998. Statistical models predicting embryo survival to term in cattle after embryo transfer. Theriogenology 50: 10531070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, W.H. and Donnison, M.J. 1999. Understanding maternal contributions to fertility in recipient cattle: development of herds with contrast8ing pregnancy rates. Animal Reproduction Science (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, W.H., Donnison, M.J. and Cox, S.F. 1998. Development of an experimental herd for investigating maternal contributions to fertility in recipient cattle. Proceedings of New Zealand Society Animal Production 58: 248251.Google Scholar
Pearson, S.J. 1999. Recipient contributions to potential pregnancy rate in cattle. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Waikato, New Zealand Google Scholar
Peterson, A.J., Donnison, M.J., Pearson, S. and McMillan, W.H. 1999. Contrasting early embryo development in a herd of recipient cattle with previously high or low pregnancy rates. Theriogenology 51: 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H.D., Liebrich, J., Berg, U. and Brem, G. 1992. Pregnancy rates and births after unilateral or bilateral transfer of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 95: 363370.Google Scholar
Sreenan, J.M. and Diskin, M.G. 1987. Factors affecting pregnancy rate following embryo transfer in the cow. Theriogenology 27: 99113.Google Scholar
Xu, X.X., Burton, J.R., Burton, L.J. and Macmillan, K.L. 1995. Reproductive performance of synchronised lactating dairy cows. Proceedings of New Zealand Society Animal Production 55: 242243.Google Scholar
Zaaiger, D., Counotte, G.H.M., Sol, J., Smidt, W.J. and Broadbent, P.J. 19993. Changes in the composition of cervical mucous of the cow during the estrous cycle as parameters for predicting potential fertility. Theriogenology 39: 569580.Google Scholar