Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-dxgz2 Total loading time: 0.167 Render date: 2021-05-15T15:55:38.336Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

The putative reward function of equine stereotypic behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A J Hemmings
Affiliation:
Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 6JS, UK
S D McBride
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, SY23 3AL, UK
N C Smith
Affiliation:
Abingdon and Witney College, Holloway Road, Witney, Oxfordshire OX28 6NE, UK
Get access

Abstract

A review of physiology and behaviour–based studies on the function of stereotypic behaviour indicates contradiction and inconsistency within the literature. By considering appropriate neurochemical data alongside an existing model of motivation (Hughes and Duncan, 1988), a greater understanding of the function of stereotypy may be gained. The Hughes and Duncan model (1988), described stereotypies as highly motivated appetitive behaviours performed repeatedly in an environment where consummatory goals are denied. Moreover, appetitive behaviours activate reward circuitry such as the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens and are thus considered to have a reward value associated with their performance (Carr, 2002; Jones et al., 1990). Stress induced sensitisation of reward circuitry may result in appetitive ‘stereotypies’ having increased reward value, perhaps becoming consummatory in their own right. In such a scenario, stereotypic behaviour could function as a coping tool, allowing the animal to counter the effects of an aversive environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bakshi, V. P. and Kelley, A. E. (1994). Sensitization and conditioning of feeding following multiple morphine microinjections into the nucleus–accumbens. Brain Research 648: 342346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Band, L. C. and Hull, E. M. (1990). Morphine and dynorphin(1-13) microinjected into the medial preoptic area and nucleus accumbens – effects on sexual behavior in male rats. Brain Research 524: 7784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, K. C. (1996). Food reward – brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 20: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, L. P. and Levine, S. (1979). Schedule–induced polydipsia suppresses pituitary–adrenal activity in rats. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology 93: 946956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabib, S., Giardino, L., Calza, L., Zanni, M., Mele, A. and Puglisiallegra, S. (1998). Stress promotes major changes in dopamine receptor densities within the mesoaccumbens and nigrostriatal systems. Neuroscience 84: 193200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, N. R. (2001). Physiology of behavior, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
Carr, K. D. (2002). Augmentation of drug reward by chronic food restriction: Behavioral evidence and underlying mechanisms. Physiology and Behavior 76: 353364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commission of the European Communities (1983). Abnormal behaviour in farm animals.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. J. and Nicol, C. J. (1991). Stereotypic behavior affects environmental preference in bank voles, clethrionomysglareolus. Animal Behaviour 41: 971977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G. M., Wiepkema, P. R. and Vanree, J. M. (1986). Endorphins implicated in stereotypies of tethered sows. Experientia 42: 198199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damsma, G., Pfaus, J. G., Nomikos, G. G., Phillips, A. G. and Fibiger, H. C. (1990). Sexual–behavior enhances dopamine transmission in the nucleus–accumbens and the striatum of the male–rat. Psychopharmacology 101: S12S12.Google Scholar
Dantzer, R. (1991). Stress, stereotypies and welfare. Behavioural Processes 25: 95102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R. and Mormede, P. (1981). Pituitary–adrenal consequences of adjunctive activities in pigs. Hormones and Behavior 15: 386395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R., Gonyou, H. W., Curtis, S. E. and Kelley, K. W. (1987). Changes in serum cortisol reveal functional differences in frustration–induced chain chewing in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 39: 775777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R., Terlouw, E. M. C., Mormede, P. and Le Moal, M. (1988). Schedule–induced polydipsia experience decreases plasma corticostereone levels but increases plasma prolactin levels. Physiology and Behavior 43: 275279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. 1991. From an animals point–of view – motivation, fitness, and animal–welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 753753.Google Scholar
Dodman, N. H., Shuster, L., Court, M. H. and Dixon, R. (1987). Investigation into the use of narcotic–antagonists in the treatment of a stereotypic behavior pattern (crib–biting) in the horse. American Journal of Veterinary Research 48: 311319.Google Scholar
Falk, J. L. (1971). The nature and determinants of adjunctive behaviour. Physiology of Behaviour 6: 577588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gariano, R. F. and Groves, P. M. (1988). Electrical–stimulation of medial prefrontal and cingulate cortex elicits bursting in a small population of mesencephalic dopamine neurons. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 537: 505507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, J. P. and Mason, G. J. (2002). Evidence for a relationship between cage stereotypies and behavioural disinhibition in laboratory rodents. Behavioural Brain Research 136: 8392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillham, S. B., Dodman, N. H., Shuster, L., Kream, R. and Rand, W. (1994). The effect of diet on cribbing behavior and plasma beta–endorphin in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 147153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, S. Q., Grace, M. K., Welch, C. C., Billington, C. J. and Levine, A. S. (1993). Naloxone's anorectic effect is dependent upon the relative palatability of food. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 46: 917921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, L., Lee, F. and Hoebel, B. G. (1988). Microdialysis in the nucleus accumbens during feeding or drugs of abuse – amphetamine, cocaine, and phencyclidine. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 537: 508511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoebel, B. G., Monaco, A. P., Hernandez, L., Aulisi, E. F., Stanley, B. G. and L., Lenard (1983). Self–injection of amphetamine directly into the brain. Psychopharmacology 81: 158163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B. O. and Duncan, I. J. H. (1988). The notion of ethological need, models of motivation and animal–welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 16961707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. H., Marsden, C. A. and Robbins, T. W. (1990). Increased sensitivity to amphetamine and reward–related stimuli following social–isolation in rats – possible disruption of dopaminedependent mechanisms of the nucleus–accumbens. Psychopharmacology 102: 364372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennes, D. and De Rycke, P. H. (1988). The influence of the performance of stereotypies on plasma corticosterone and eosinophil levels in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Proccedings of the 29th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology 238-240.Google Scholar
Krawczyk, D. C. (2002). Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision making. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 26: 631664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebelt, D. (1998). Physiological correlates associated with cribbing behaviour in horses: changes in thermal threshold, heart–rate, plasma beta–endorphin and serotonin. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement: 2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majeed, N. H., Przewlocka, B., Wedzony, K. and Przewlocki, R. (1986). Stimulation of food–intake following opioid microinjection into the nucleus accumbens septi in rats. Peptides 7: 711716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, G. J. (1991). Stereotypies– a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 10151037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, K., Suzuki, W. and Tanaka, K. (2003). Neuronal orrelates of goal–based motor selection in the prefrontal cortex. Science 301: 229232.Google ScholarPubMed
McBride, S. D. (2000). An investigation into the stereotypic behaviour of the horse. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
McBride, S. D. and Long, L. (2001). The perception and subsequent management of equine stereotypic behaviour by horse owners; implications for animal welfare. The Veterinary Record 148: 799802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, S. D. and Cuddeford, D. (2001). The putative welfarereducing effects of preventing equine stereotypic behaviour. Animal Welfare 10: 173189.Google Scholar
McBride, S. D. and Hemmings, A. (2001). Striatum D1 dopamine receptors are significantly higher in horses performing stereotypic behaviour. Research in Veterinary Science. 70: 12.Google Scholar
McGreevy, P. D. and Nicol, C. J. (1995). Behavioural and physiological consequences associated with prevention of cribbing. Proccedings of the 29th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology 135136.Google Scholar
Mucha, R. F. and Iversen, S. D. (1986). Increased food–intake after opioid microinjections into nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat. Brain Research 397: 214224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, C. J. (2002). Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 193208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurnberg, H. G., Keith, S. J. and Paxton, D. M. (1997). Consideration of the relevance of ethological animal models for human repetitive behavioral spectrum disorders. Biological Psychiatry 41: 226229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pell, S. M. and McGreevy, P. D. (1999). A study of cortisol and betaendorphin levels in stereotypic and normal Thoroughbreds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J. (1993). The coping hypothesis of stereotypic behavior. Animal Behaviour 45: 613615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W. and Rushen, J. (1992). Effects of naloxone on stereotypic and normal behavior of tethered and loose–housed sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W., Rushen, J. and Depassille, A. M. B. (1991). Stereotypic behavior and heart–rate in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 50: 617624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, T., Sato, S., Kosaka, K., Sakamoto, N. and Tokumoto, K. (1998). Tongue–playing and heart rate in calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 179182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. P. and Lee, N. M. (2003). Opioid receptor interactions: Local and nonlocal, symmetric and asymmetric, physical and functional. Life Sciences 73: 18731893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., Hemmings, A. and McBride, S. D. (2003). The potential reward value of equine stereotypic behaviour. Equine Science Conference Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
Soussignan, R. and Koch, P. (1985). Rhythmical stereotypies (legswinging) associated with reductions in heart rate in normal school children. Biological Psychology 21: 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tazi, A., Dantzer, R., Mormede, P. and Lemoal, M. (1986). Pituitaryadrenal correlates of schedule–induced–polydipsia and wheel running in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 19: 249256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, E. M. C., Lawrence, A. B., Ladewig, J., Depassille, A. M., Rushen, J. and Schouten, W. G. P. (1991). Relationship between plasma–cortisol and stereotypic activities in pigs. Behavioural Processes 25: 133153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tzschentke, T. M. (2000). The medial prefrontal cortex as a part of the brain reward system. Amino Acids 19: 211219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, M., Singer, G., Finlay, J. and Gibson, S. (1983). The effect of 6–ohda lesions of the nucleus accumbens septum on schedule–induced drinking, wheelrunning and corticosterone levels in the rat. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 18: 129136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, R. A. (1996). Addictive drugs and brain–stimulation reward. Annual Review of Neuroscience 19: 319340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurbel, H. and Stauffacher, M. (1996). Prevention of stereotypy in laboratory mice – effects on stress physiology and behavior. Physiology and Behavior 59: 11631170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanella, A. J., Broom, D. M., Hunter, J. C. and Mendl, M. T. (1996). Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows. Physiology and Behavior 59: 769775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The putative reward function of equine stereotypic behaviour
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The putative reward function of equine stereotypic behaviour
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The putative reward function of equine stereotypic behaviour
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *