Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:59:53.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rate of endogenous methionine oxidation in rats at different levels of methionine intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. J. Neale  and
J. C. Waterlow
R. J. Neale
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biochemistry and Food Science, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics. LE12 5RD
J. C. Waterlow
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The fractional rates of loss of 14C and body-weight were measured in growing female rats after a single dose of [1-14C]methionine. After the dose, the rats were maintained for 30 d on diets containing graded amounts of methionine and killed at 30 d.

2. By 20 d after the dose the level of labelling of body proteins was fairly uniform. From 20 to 30 d, 14CO2 was collected at intervals. The rats were killed at 30 d and the total radioactivity remaining in the body was measured.

3. The fractional loss of 14CO2 between days 20 and 30 was constant regardless of methionine intake except at the highest intake level.

4. After correcting the fractional loss of 14CO2 for urinary 14C loss, a value of 35 mg/kg body-weight (20 mg/kg body-weight0·75) was obtained for the rate of endogenous methionine oxidation.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , July 1983 , pp. 157 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (1973). Technical Report Series of the World Health Organization No. 522.Google Scholar
Neale, R. J. & Waterlow, J. C. (1974 a). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, R. J. & Waterlow, J. C. (1974 b). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, R. J. & Waterlow, J. C. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 37, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, P. R. & Stewart, R. J. C. (1972). Laboratory Animals 6, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, A. K. & Hegsted, D. M. (1970). Journal of Nutrition 100, 1363–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wannemacher, R. W. & Dinterman, R. E. (1980). Biochemical Journal 190, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, J. C. & Stephen, J. M. L. (1966). British Journal of Nutrition 20, 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar