Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T02:52:13.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biotin deficiency and fatty liver and kidney syndrome in chicks given purified diets containing different fat and protein levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

C. C. Whitehead
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
D. W. Bannister
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
A. J. Evans
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
W. G. Siller
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
P. A. L. Wight
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The occurrence of biotin deficiency and fatty liver and kidney syndrome (FLKS) in chicks was studied using a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial-design experiment in which the variables were dietary biotin, fat and protein, and starvation.

2. The severity of biotin deficiency, using growth retardation and severity of dermal lesions as criteria, was least when the low-biotin diet also contained low levels of fat and protein. Addition of fat or protein increased the severity of the deficiency. Tissue fatty acid composition was affected by biotin deficiency only in those birds given the low-protein, low-fat diet. The main change was an increase in the ratio, 16:1 fatty acids:18:0 fatty acids. Plasma glucose and free fatty acid levels in non-fasted birds were unaffected by the dietary variables.

3. Mortality from FLKS with the diet containing low biotin, fat and protein levels was 52% at 28 d, but was reduced or eliminated when the dietary level of any of these ingredients was increased.

4. Starvation considerably increased the incidence of FLKS in the period immediately after fasting, and also affected plasma glucose and free fatty acid concentrations. Liver fatty acid composition indicated an increase in the proportion of 18:0 at the expense of 16:1 and 18:1, irrespective of diet, except when the bird developed FLKS, when 16:1 and 18:1 concentrations increased in proportion, at the expense of 18:0.

5. The relationship between biotin deficiency and FLKS, and a possible mechanism for the induction of FLKS by starvation are discussed.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1976

References

Anderson, J. O. & Warnick, R. E. (1970). Poult. Sci. 49, 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. W. (1975). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 52B (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Bannister, D. W., Evans, A. J. & Whitehead, C. C. (1975 a). Res. vet. Sci. 18, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. W., Evans, A. J. & Whitehead, C. C. (1975 b). Res. vet. Sci. 19, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R., Whitehead, C. C. & Teague, P. W. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 18, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. M., Denman, F. & Jackson, R. (1973). Poult. Sci. 52, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. J., Bannister, D. W. & Whitehead, C. C. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 18, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, N. & Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsley, L. A. (1973). Vet. Rec. 93, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, G., Dawson, A. & Marks, V. (1968). Proc. Ass. clin. Biochem. 5, 42.Google Scholar
Payne, C. G., Gilchrist, P., Pearson, J. A. & Hemsley, L. A. (1974). Br. Poult. Sci. 15, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. & Brown, W. O. (1971). In Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl, vol. 1, p. 295 [Bell, D. J. and Freeman, B. M., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roland, D. A. & Edwards, H. M. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. L., Nesheim, M. C. & Young, R. J. (1969). Nutrition of the Chicken. Ithaca, New York: M. L. Scott and Associates.Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. C. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 18, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C. C., Bannister, D. W., Wight, P. A. L. & Weiser, H. (1974). Prac. xvth Wld Poult. Congr. p. 70.Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. C. & Blair, R. (1974 a). Res. vet. Sci. 17, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C. C. & Blair, R. (1974 b). Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 30, 231.Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. C., Blair, R., Bannister, D. W. & Evans, A. J. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 18, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C. C., Blair, R., Bannister, D. W., Evans, A. J. & Jones, R. M. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 19 (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Wight, P. A. L. & Siller, W. G. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 19, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. D. & Skeggs, H. R. (1944). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 56, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Y.-Y. & Leveille, G. A. (1969). J. Nutr. 98, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Y.-Y., Leveille, G. A. & Wiley, J. H. (1970).J. Nutr. 100, 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar