Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:45:30.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing iodine intakes in pregnancy: why does this matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

Elizabeth N. Pearce*
Affiliation:
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, 88 East Newton Street, H3600, Boston MA 02118, USA fax +1 617 638 7221 email elizabeth.pearce@bmc.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Invited Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015 

The study by Condo et al. ( Reference Condo, Makrides and Skeaff 1 ) in this issue of the British Journal of Nutrition assessed the utility of a forty-four-item FFQ for use in determining the iodine intake of pregnant Australian women. This is the first such study designed specifically for pregnancy. A strength of the study was the administration of the FFQ at two different time points in gestation, which allowed for assessment of the reproducibility of results. The study validated the FFQ against multiple standards, including spot and 24 h urinary iodine concentrations, measurements of serum thyroglobulin and thyroid function tests (although thyroid function tends to be poorly correlated with iodine intake), and 4-d weighed food records.

Why is the accurate ascertainment of iodine intake in pregnant women important? First, pregnant women and their fetuses are particularly vulnerable to the effects of iodine deficiency disorders. Adequate maternal iodine intake is essential for normal fetal neurodevelopment. Worldwide, iodine deficiency remains the leading preventable cause of intellectual impairments( 2 ). Severe iodine deficiency is associated with an increased risk for stillbirth, miscarriage, congenital anomalies and perinatal mortality( Reference Zimmermann and Boelaert 3 ). Even mild iodine deficiency has recently been linked to lowered intelligence quotient and school performance( Reference Hynes, Otahal and Hay 4 , Reference Bath, Steer and Golding 5 ). Second, both iodine requirements and typical diets are different in pregnant compared with non-pregnant adults. Pregnant women need increased iodine intake due to increased thyroid hormone production, increased renal losses and transfer of iodine to the fetus( Reference Glinoer 6 ). In non-pregnant adults, the recommended daily iodine intake is 150 μg( 2 , 7 , 8 ). In Australia and New Zealand, the reference dietary intake for iodine in pregnancy is 220 μg/d, similar to the 220 μg/d RDA set by the US Institute of Medicine, and the 250 μg daily intake recommended by the WHO( 2 , 7 , 8 ). By contrast, the UK fails to recommend increased iodine intake in pregnancy, defining the reference nutrient intake as only 140 μg/d during gestation( 9 ).

Assessing the iodine status of individuals is challenging due to the lack of an individual biomarker. Although median urinary iodine concentrations can be used to assess the iodine status of populations, the marked day-to-day variability in typical iodine excretion means that ten urine samples are needed in order to estimate an individual's iodine status with reasonable precision( Reference König, Andersson and Hotz 10 ). Blood thyroglobulin measurements have been established as an index of population iodine status in school-aged children, but not in pregnant women. Iodine is found in a wide variety of foods; however, in many regions, iodine content in food is both highly variable and unlabelled. Data from a well-validated FFQ could complement the use of biomarkers for population studies in pregnancy. A FFQ on iodine intake could also potentially inform recommendations for individual patients, although, given the many competing demands on provider time, a forty-four-item questionnaire may be impractical for use in the clinical setting.

Assessing iodine intake in pregnancy is currently of particular importance in Australia. Although historically iodine deficiency was recorded in Australia, by the 1980s, Australia appeared to be iodine sufficient, probably as a result of the use of iodophor cleansers by the dairy industry( Reference Li, Ma and Boyages 11 ). Since the 1980s, the use of iodophors in the dairy industry has declined. Several studies performed in the last 15 years demonstrated mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency among pregnant women in different regions of Australia( Reference Li, Ma and Boyages 11 Reference Blumenthal, Byth and Eastman 16 ). In response to these data, starting in October 2009, the use of iodised salt was mandated in Australia and New Zealand for making all breads except organic bread. Due to concerns that this approach might not be adequate to meet the increased iodine requirements of pregnancy, starting in 2010, the National Health and Medical Research Council recommended that all Australian women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or considering pregnancy should take a daily supplement of 150 μg of iodine( 17 ). The data from Condo et al. ( Reference Condo, Makrides and Skeaff 1 ) suggest that this recommendation has not been universally adopted; only 75 % of the pregnant women in their study have reported the use of iodine-containing supplements. This is consistent with recent surveys demonstrating poor knowledge about the importance of iodine in pregnancy among both pregnant women and their health care providers( Reference Lucas, Charlton and Brown 18 , Reference Martin, Savige and Mitchell 19 ). Reassuringly, the median spot urinary iodine concentration in the study by Condo et al. ( Reference Condo, Makrides and Skeaff 1 ) was 212 μg/l, consistent with iodine sufficiency by WHO criteria( 2 ). Urinary iodine concentrations were significantly lower in the twenty-four women who did not report ingesting iodine-containing supplements. Another recent Australian study has similarly demonstrated iodine sufficiency among only those pregnant women who were ingesting iodine-containing supplements( Reference Charlton, Yeatman and Brock 20 ). FFQ along with urinary iodine measurements could be utilised to gain a better understanding of both current iodine status and iodine sources among pregnant and lactating Australian women.

Condo et al. ( Reference Condo, Makrides and Skeaff 1 ) suggest that their FFQ might be adapted for use in industrialised countries other than Australia. The re-emergence of mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency has occurred in recent years in several developed regions. For example, endemic goitre was eliminated in the UK by the 1980s in what has been described as an ‘accidental public health triumph,’ through a combination of the increased use of iodine by the dairy industry and increased intakes of milk by the population( Reference Phillips 21 , Reference Vanderpump 22 ). However, probably due to more recent declines in milk drinking, studies now indicate mild iodine deficiency in UK adolescent girls and pregnant women( Reference Vanderpump, Lazarus and Smyth 23 Reference Pearce, Lazarus and Smyth 25 ). Although the US population has been iodine-sufficient overall for decades, the most recent national surveys have demonstrated mild iodine deficiency among pregnant women( Reference Caldwell, Pan and Mortensen 26 ), and daily iodine supplements have been recommended for women who are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy( Reference Stagnaro-Green, Abalovich and Alexander 27 , Reference De Groot, Abalovich and Alexander 28 ). The FFQ might be especially relevant for countries such as Denmark, which, similar to Australia, has mandated the use of iodised salt in breads, but where iodine deficiency in pregnancy may persist( Reference Andersen, Sørensen and Krejbjerg 29 ).

The most important limitation of the study of Condo et al. ( Reference Condo, Makrides and Skeaff 1 ) was its inability to assess iodine intakes from iodised salt, the use of which was reported by 47 % of the women in the study. Salt iodisation has been the mainstay of iodine deficiency prevention efforts globally, and is a critically important source of dietary iodine in many regions worldwide. Although supplement use was not included in the FFQ, it was assessed separately. Inclusion of information about supplements would be important for use of the FFQ as a clinical or research instrument in many settings. Development of the FFQ was informed by an up-to-date Australian food composition database based on analytical data( 30 ). Unfortunately, such data, which would be required to adapt the FFQ for use in other regions, are not universally available. Development of accurate food composition data for iodine will be a necessary first step for the development of FFQ instruments to assess the intakes of iodine by pregnant women in other regions.

References

1 Condo, D, Makrides, M, Skeaff, S, et al. (2015) Development and validation of an iodine-specific FFQ to estimate iodine intake in Australian pregnant women. Br J Nutr 113, 944952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 WHO, UNICEF & ICCIDD (2007) Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Monitoring their Elimination. A Guided for Programme Managers, 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
3 Zimmermann, MB & Boelaert, K (2015) Iodine deficiency and thyroid disorders. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (Epublication ahead of print version 12 January 2015) .Google Scholar
4 Hynes, KL, Otahal, P, Hay, I, et al. (2013) Mild iodine deficiency during pregnancy is associated with reduced educational outcomes in the offspring: 9-year follow-up of the gestational iodine cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98, 19541962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Bath, SC, Steer, CD, Golding, J, et al. (2013) Effect of inadequate iodine status in UK pregnant women on cognitive outcomes in their children: results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Lancet 27, 331337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Glinoer, D (2007) The importance of iodine nutrition during pregnancy. Public Health Nutr 10, 15421546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Institute of Medicine (2001) Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
8 National Health and Medical Research Council (2006) Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand, Including Recommended Dietary Intakes. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
9 Department of Health (2001) Dietary Reference Values for Food, Energy and Nutrients in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
10 König, F, Andersson, M, Hotz, K, et al. (2011) Ten repeat collections for urinary iodine from spot samples or 24-hour samples are needed to reliably estimate individual iodine status in women. J Nutr 141, 20492054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Li, M, Ma, G, Boyages, SC, et al. (2001) Re-emergence of iodine deficiency in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 10, 200203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Travers, CA, Guttikonda, K, Norton, CA, et al. (2006) Iodine status in pregnant women and their newborns: are our babies at risk of iodine deficiency? Med J Aust 184, 617620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Burgess, JR, Seal, JA, Stilwell, GM, et al. (2007) A case for universal salt iodisation to correct iodine deficiency in pregnancy: another salutary lesson from Tasmania. Med J Aust 186, 574576.Google Scholar
14 Hamrosi, MA, Wallace, EM & Riley, MD (2005) Iodine status in pregnant women living in Melbourne differs by ethnic group. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 14, 2731.Google ScholarPubMed
15 McElduff, A, McElduff, P, Gunton, JE, et al. (2002) Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations in northern Sydney: further indications of mild iodine deficiency? Med J Aust 176, 317320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Blumenthal, N, Byth, K & Eastman, CJ (2012) Iodine intake and thyroid function in pregnant women in a private clinical practice in northwestern Sydney before mandatory fortification of bread with iodised salt. J Thyroid Res 2012, 798963.Google Scholar
17 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2010) Iodine supplementation for pregnant and breastfeeding women. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/new45_statement.pdf.Google Scholar
18 Lucas, CJ, Charlton, KE, Brown, L, et al. (2014) Antenatal shared care: are pregnant women being adequately informed about iodine and nutritional supplementation? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54, 515521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Martin, JC, Savige, GS & Mitchell, EK (2014) Health knowledge and iodine intake in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54, 312316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Charlton, KE, Yeatman, H, Brock, E, et al. (2013) Improvement in iodine status of pregnant Australian women 3 years after introduction of a mandatory iodine fortification programme. Prev Med 57, 2630.Google Scholar
21 Phillips, DIW (1997) Iodine, milk, and the elimination of endemic goiter in Britain: the story of an accidental public health triumph. J Epidemiol Community Health 51, 391393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Vanderpump, M (2014) Thyroid and iodine nutritional status: a UK perspective. Clin Med 14, Suppl. 6, s7s11.Google Scholar
23 Vanderpump, MP, Lazarus, JH, Smyth, PP, et al. (2011) Iodine status of UK schoolgirls: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 377, 20072012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Bath, SC, Walter, A, Taylor, A, et al. (2014) Iodine deficiency in pregnant women living in the South East of the UK: the influence of diet and nutritional supplements on iodine status. Br J Nutr 111, 16221631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Pearce, EN, Lazarus, JH, Smyth, PP, et al. (2010) Perchlorate and thiocyanate exposure and thyroid function in first-trimester pregnant women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95, 32073215.Google Scholar
26 Caldwell, KL, Pan, Y, Mortensen, ME, et al. (2013) Iodine status in pregnant women in the National Children's Study and in U.S. women (15–44 years), National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2010. Thyroid 23, 927937.Google Scholar
27 Stagnaro-Green, A, Abalovich, M, Alexander, E, et al. (2011) Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid 21, 10811125.Google Scholar
28 De Groot, L, Abalovich, M, Alexander, EK, et al. (2012) Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, 25432565.Google Scholar
29 Andersen, SL, Sørensen, LK, Krejbjerg, A, et al. (2014) Iodine status in Danish pregnant and breastfeeding women including studies of some challenges in urinary iodine status evaluation. J Trace Elem Med Biol (Epublication ahead of print version 2 December 2014) .Google ScholarPubMed
30 Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (2011) NUTTABB 2010 – Australian Food Composition Tables. Canberra: Food Standards Australia and New Zealand.Google Scholar