Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T07:35:50.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Qualitative Study: Why Prolonged Stay in the Recovery Room?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2011

Sharifa B. Lalani*
Affiliation:
The Aga Khan University School of Nursing, Karachi, Pakistan
Fauzia Ali
Affiliation:
The Aga Khan University School of Nursing, Karachi, Pakistan
Zeenatkhanu Kanji
Affiliation:
The Aga Khan University School of Nursing, Karachi, Pakistan
Salma Jaffer
Affiliation:
The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
Mohammed Ali
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
*
Correspondence to: S. B. Lalani, RN, RM BScN, MScN, STTI Rho.Delta Chapter, Senior Instructor, The Aga Khan University School of Nursing, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan. E-mail: sharifa.lalani@aku.edu; Tel: +92 21 3493 0051 Ext.: 5443, Direct: 3486 5432; Fax: +92 21 493 4294/493 2095
Get access

Abstract

There are a number of factors that prolong patients’ stay in the recovery room (RR), which are related to system or clinical issues. However, less has been discovered from the RR nurses about reasons for prolonged patient stay and recommendations to solve this issue. Prolonged patient stay of more than 2 hours in the RR interferes with the primary role of the RR nurse, which is to provide care to immediate postanaesthesia patients. Consequently, this could affect the operating room schedule, normal flow of patients to the RR and discharge to the nursing units.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruce, M. A study in time: performance improvement to reduce excess holding time in recovery room. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 2000; 15(4): 237241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drain, CB. The Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Critical Care Approach to Post Anesthesia Nursing. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 2003.Google Scholar
Jones, AG, Harper, SJ. ‘Ventilating in recovery’ – the way forward: intensive therapy or postoperative critical care? British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 88(4): 473474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lincoln, YS, Guba, EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariana, EC, McLeod, JA. Emergency care for the VIP patient. Intensive Care Medicine 2007; 20: 969975.Google Scholar
Merkouris, A, Papathanassoglou, EDE, Lemonidou, C. Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing care: quantitative or qualitative approach? International Journal of Nursing Studies 2004; 41: 355367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polit, DF, Beck, CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.Google Scholar
Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Hungler, BP. Essential of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2001.Google Scholar
Samad, K, Khan, M, Hameedullah, , Fauzia, AK, Hamid, M, Fazal, HK. Unplanned prolonged postanesthesia care unit length of stay and factors affecting it. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 2006; 56(3): 108112.Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health 2000; 23: 334340.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smedley, P. Safe staffing in the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit: no magic formula. British Journal of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2010; 11(1): 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziser, A, Alkobi, M, Markovits, R, Rozenberg, B. The postanesthesia care unit as a temporary admission location due to intensive care and ward overflow. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 88(4): 577579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed