Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2008
Francis Hauksbee (1660–1713) is well known for his double-barrelled air-pump. However, the origin of this pump, and Hauksbee's background, are often described as a mystery. This text seeks to dispel the riddle. It is argued that Hauksbee's competence as an exceptional maker of air-pumps was developed between 1699 and 1703 as a result of his experiences with the construction, manufacturing and sale of cupping-glasses. His cupping utensils embodied a new design, where syringes were used to evacuate the glasses, instead of the traditional way by fire or mouth suction. These syringes, which in fact were small air-pumps, were perfected between 1699 and 1701. A larger syringe, introduced in 1701, served as a transition from the cupping-syringe to his first air-pump for use in natural philosophy. This syringe was described as a ‘combined engine’, which could serve as an air-pump, a condensing engine and a syringe for injecting air, wax or mercury into pathological specimens. Hauksbee's first air-pump was a single-barrelled model introduced in 1702, based on the combined engine. Its various features, such as easy and convenient leak-tightening, exact pressure measurements by an in-built barometer and an air-inlet function for readmission of air into the receiver, are discussed. Finally, it is shown that these activities gave Hauksbee the reputation of being an outstanding instrument-maker, years before the double-barrelled air-pump was in sight.
1 Wilson, G., ‘On the early history of the air-pumps in England’, Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal (1849), 46, 330–54Google Scholar.
2 This article is based on the first two chapters of my D.Phil. thesis: T. Brundtland, ‘Pneumatics established: Francis Hauksbee and the air-pump’, University of Oxford, 2006, B.L. DN24024.
3 National Gallery, London, NG725.
4 Compare the entries on ‘air-pump’ in J. Harris, Lexicon Technicum, 1st edn, London, 1704, and 5th edn, London, 1737.
5 This was first suggested by Henry Guerlac in the 1950s. H. Guerlac, ‘Sir Isaac and the ingenious Mr. Hauksbee’, in Mélanges Alexandre Koyré: L'Aventure de la science (ed. I. B. Cohen and R. Taton), Paris, 1964, 229–53.
6 H. Guerlac, ‘F. Hauksbee’, in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (ed. C. C. Gillispie), 16 vols., New York, 1981, iv, 169.
7 J. Heilbron, Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries, Berkeley, 1979, 229.
8 R. S. Westfall, Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton, Cambridge, 1998, 632.
9 R. S. Westfall, http://galileo.rice.edu/Catalog/NewFiles/hauksbee.html.
10 T. Brundtland, The Laboratory Work of Professor Kristian Birkeland, Tromsø, 1997, 59–71.
11 Robert Boyle had previously pointed out that the conditions in air-pump receivers resembled those that took place in traditional cupping-glasses, but there are no indications that he thought of combining syringes and cupping-glasses for practical and commercial applications. R. Boyle, The Works of Robert Boyle (ed. M. Hunter and E. Davis), 14 vols., London, 1999, iii, 3, 78, 100.
12 S. Shapin and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump, Princeton, 1985.
13 Stroup, A., ‘Christiaan Huygens & the development of the air-pump’, Janus (1981), 68, 129–58Google ScholarPubMed.
14 van Helden, A. C., ‘The age of the air-pump’, Tractrix (1991), 3, 149–72Google Scholar.
15 F. Hauksbee, Physico-mechanical Experiments on Various Subjects, London, 1709, (2nd edn 1719).
16 S. Pumfrey, ‘Francis Hauksbee (bap. 1660, d. 1713)’, DNB.
17 N. McKendrick, J. Brewer and J. H. Plumb, The Birth of a Consumer Society, London, 1983, 328.
18 S. D. Snobelen, ‘The lecturing careers of Francis Hauksbee Sr. and James Hodgson’, University of Cambridge M.Phil. thesis, 1995.
19 T. Brundtland, ‘Public lectures on natural philosophy in early 18th-century London’, in Kunnskap og kunnskapsformidling på 1700-tallet (Knowledge and Dissemination of Knowledge in the Eighteenth Century), Oslo, 2004.
20 A. Morton and J. Wess, Public and Private Science, Oxford, 1993, 39–65.
21 A thorough discussion of the extensive growth of scientific commodities and lectures on natural philosophy in this period is found in L. Stewart, The Rise of Public Science, Cambridge, 1992.
22 Shapin and Schaffer, op. cit. (12), 25.
23 J. Harris, ‘Plate with air-pumps’, in idem, Lexicon Technicum, 1st edn, London, 1704.
24 C. Blakemore and S. Jennett, The Oxford Companion to the Body, Oxford, 2001, 91.
25 W. L. Jones, Ministering to Minds Diseased: A History of Psychiatric Treatment, London, 1983, 7.
26 The belief in blood-letting and cupping as a remedy for most diseases was so strong that even healthy people chose to be bled each spring as an ‘annual cleaning’. Blakemore and Jennett, op. cit. (24), 91.
27 Post Man, 31 January 1699. (All newspapers cited in this article were published in London. Dates are given according to the new style.)
28 Blakemore and Jennett, op. cit. (24), 91.
29 W. Brockbank, Ancient Therapeutic Arts, London, 1954, 67.
30 Brockbank, op. cit. (29), 81.
31 Brockbank, op. cit. (29), 70.
32 Post Man, 31 January 1699.
33 Flying Post, 9 May 1699.
34 Post Man, 2 January 1701.
35 Flying Post, 9 May 1699.
36 Post Man, 2 January 1701.
37 Presumably to be identified as the Reverend Thomas Luffkin (1678–c.1746), son of John Luffkin, an apothecary. J. Foster, Alumni Oxoniensis 1500–1714, 4 vols., Oxford, 1891, iii, 949.
38 Luffkin, T., ‘An extract of a letter’, Philosophical Transactions (1699), 21, 287–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
39 Luffkin, T., ‘A letter’, Philosophical Transactions (1699), 21, 408–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar (in Latin). An English translation is given in the abridged edition: Philosophical Transactions, Abridged and Disposed, 3 vols., London, 1749, iii, 261–2.
40 The population of Colchester around 1700 is estimated at between eight and nine thousand. The Cambridge Urban History of Britain (ed. P. Clark), 2 vols., Cambridge, 2000, ii, 384.
41 R. S. Porter, Enlightenment, London, 2000, 79.
42 Brockbank, op. cit. (29), 82.
43 Flying Post, 9 May 1699.
44 J. Harris, ‘Cucurbitula’, in idem, Lexicon Technicum, 1st edn, London, 1704.
45 Post Man, 4 January 1701.
46 A scarificator was a specially designed instrument that could make up to sixteen small incisions in one operation by means of spring-loaded knives. The earliest evidence I have found of the use of such instruments in cupping is from Hauksbee (1701; op. cit. (45)). Previously the introduction of scarificators in cupping has been attributed to Laurence Heister (1683–1758) (Brockbank, op. cit. (29), 80), and the scarificator has been described as an early nineteenth-century device (R. Porter (ed.), The Cambridge Illustrated History of Medicine, Cambridge, 1996, 124). An early scarificator is described by Ambroise Paré (1510–1590); however, this is only used for curing gangrene. A Paré, An Explanation of the Fashion and Use of Three and Fifty Instruments of Chirurgery, Edinburgh, 1634, 107.
47 Post Man, 7 July 1703.
48 T. Luffkin, ‘A letter’, Philosophical Transactions, Abridged and Disposed, op. cit. (39), iii, 261–2, 262.
49 Shapin and Schaffer, op. cit. (12), 229–30.
50 ‘Any gentleman living in the Country shall receive Directions in Writing how to keep and order the Utensils on all occasions’. Post Man, 16 August 1701.
51 Hauksbee gave no prices. It is with the instrument-maker Benjamin Martin in the 1750s that one first learns of the cost of apparatus such as that Hauksbee made. In 1757 Martin sold cupping-syringes with glasses for one guinea. According to several investigations, however, prices and wages were in general relatively stable during the first three quarters of the eighteenth century. See J. Burnett, History of the Cost of Living, Aldershot, 1993 (first published 1969), 131; J. Millburn, Retailer of the Sciences, London, 1986, 29; see also http://www.pierre-marteau.com/currency/indices/uk-02.html.
52 R. Campbell, The London Tradesman, London, 1747, 331–40.
53 E. Hatton, A New View of London, London, 1708, 784–98. Hatton lists six bagnios in London and describes them as places for ‘Sweating, Cupping and Bathing’.
54 B. Lillywhite, London Coffee Houses, London, 1963, 95–7; C. Thompson, The Quacks of Old London, Philadelphia, 1929, 263–71; Bennion, op. cit. (46), 48.
55 Post Man, 28 September 1706.
56 The operator ‘fetched in his instruments, and fixed three glasses to my back, which, by drawing out the air, stuck to me as close as a Cantharides-plaister to the head of a Lunatick’. N. Ward, The London Spy, London, 1927 (first published 1703), 167.
57 T. Mapleson, A Treatise on the Art of Cupping, London, 1813, 27.
58 Post Man, 10 October 1706.
59 The Flying Post: or, The Post-Master, London, 1699; The Post-Man, and the Historical Account etc., London, 1699–1706; G. Kepar, The Gardener's Almanack for the Year of our Lord 1702, London, 1702; G. Parker, A Double Ephemeris for Year of our Lord 1703, London, 1703.
60 Post Man, 13 November 1701.
61 Boyle, op. cit. (11), i, 160–1.
62 Calculations based on volumes of cupping-glasses, cupping-syringes, air-pump receivers and air-pump barrels of ten, fifty, 11,000 and 270 cubic centimetres respectively, and an end-pressure of 50 millibars.
63 F. J. Cole, ‘The history of anatomical injections’, in Studies in the History and Method of Science (ed. C. Singer), 2 vols., Oxford, 1921, i, 323.
64 Such a syringe, convertible from a simple air-pump to a condensing engine by turning the piston upside down, is described in J. Desaguliers, A Course of Experimental Philosophy, London, 1744, 390, Plate 21, Figure 11, and Plate 24, Figures 5 and 6.
65 An experiment presumably performed with this engine in ‘condensing mode’ is described in Hauksbee, F., ‘An experiment, to show the cause of the descent of the mercury in a storm’, Philosophical Transactions (1704), 24, 1629–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
66 Post Man, 27 October 1702.
67 Based on instruments held in the Museum of the History of Science, Oxford.
68 For a discussion of the qualities of the air-pumps of Guericke (1602–86), see Van Helden, op. cit. (14).
69 Boyle, op. cit. (11), vi, 115.
70 Huygens, C. and Papin, D., ‘Some experiments touching animals’, Philosophical Transactions (1675), 10, 542–8, 547Google Scholar.
71 J. Harris, ‘Air-pumps’, in idem, Lexicon Technicum, 1st edn, London, 1704.
72 Boyle, op. cit. (11), i, 161.
73 This was suggested by Huygens. See Stroup, op. cit. (13) 131, 152.
74 Boyle, op. cit. (11), vi, 115, 133, 141.
75 Flying Post, 9 May 1699.
76 Harris, op. cit. (71).
77 Hauksbee's own description of the barometer is given in Hauksbee, op. cit. (15), 3.
78 29.5 inches (760 mm) of mercury corresponds to normal atmospheric pressure.
79 Boyle, op. cit. (11), i, 157 (the first air-pumps) and vi, 36 (the second pump).
80 Harris, op. cit. (71).
81 In Boyle's second pump a deviation from the correct sequence would result in the receiver being filled with water.
82 Royal Society Journal Book, JBC 10, 1702–14, 22 December 1703.
83 Boyle, op. cit. (11), i, 195.
84 Harris, op. cit. (71).
85 Derham, W., ‘Experiments about the motion of pendulums in vacuo’, Philosophical Transactions (1704), 24, 1785–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
86 Hauksbee, F., ‘Several experiments on the attrition of bodies in vacuo’, Philosophical Transactions (1705), 24, 2165–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tab. 2.
87 Boyle's last series of air-pump experiments (using Papin's double-barrelled pump) are described in R. Boyle, A Continuation of New Experiments (…) The Second Part, London, 1682. See Boyle, op. cit. (11), ix, 123–263.
88 Post Man, 1 May 1705.
89 Harris, op. cit. (71).
90 Derham, op. cit. (85), 1786.
91 Daily Courant, 9 December 1704.
92 Post Man, 31 January 1699.
93 Flying Post, 9 May 1699.
94 In the period between 1690 and 1700 about twenty per cent of the elected Fellows belonged to this group. M. Hunter, The Royal Society and Its Fellows, 1660–1700, Oxford, 1994.
95 W. Cowper, The Anatomy of the Human Body, Oxford, 1698.
96 Harris, ‘Barometers’, in idem, Lexicon Technicum, 1st edn, London, 1704. See Figure 2. Hauksbee was a subscriber to Lexicon Technicum.
97 Royal Society Journal Book, op. cit. (82), 22 December 1703.
98 Other popular topics were mechanics, optics, hydrostatics and astronomy.
99 J. Desaguliers, Physico-mechanical Lectures, London, 1717, 39.
100 W. Vream, A Description of the Air-Pump, London, 1717, Experiment 18.
101 Boyle, op. cit. (11), vii, 463.
102 J. Harris, ‘Air's weight’, Lexicon Technicum, 5th edn, London, 1737; Desaguliers, op. cit. (64), 256.
103 Vream, op. cit. (100), Experiment 17.
104 Shapin and Schaffer, op. cit. (12), 274–6.
105 Boyle, op. cit. (11), ix, p. xxii; Boyle's modern editors here supply no new evidence but simply refer back to Leviathan and the Air-Pump.
106 Boyle, R., ‘New experiments about the weaken'd spring’, Philosophical Transactions (1675), 10, 467–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
107 Hauksbee, F., ‘Several experiments on the attrition of bodies in vacuo’, Philosophical Transactions (1704), 24, 2165–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Boyle's book, A Continuation of New Experiments (…) The Second Part, describing his third air-pump (made by Papin), was reviewed in the rather obscure Weekly Memorials for the Ingenious, London, 11 December 1682, 335–9.
108 For a description of air-pumps and air-pump experiments in the Royal Society at this period see Houghton, J., A Collection for the Improvements of Husbandry and Trade 1, No. 17, 4 June 1692Google Scholar.