Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:56:48.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Financial Theory of Defined Benefit Pension Schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

C.J. Exley ,
S.J.B. Mehta  and
A.D. Smith
C.J. Exley
Affiliation:
William M Mercer, Wellington Plaza, 31 Wellington Street, Leeds, LS1 4DL, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)113 243 6671; E-mail: jon.exley@uk.wmmercer.com
S.J.B. Mehta
Affiliation:
43 Fairhazel Gardens, London, NW6 3QN, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)20 7372 6335; Fax: +44 (0)20 7372 6335; E-mail: shyam.mehta@bnpparibas.com
A.D. Smith
Affiliation:
Bacon & Woodrow, Parkside House, Ashley Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5BS, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1372 733858
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Increasingly, modern business and investment management techniques are founded on approaches to measurement of profit and risk developed by financial economists. This paper begins by analysing corporate pension provision from the perspective of such financial theory. The results of this analysis are then reconciled with the sometimes contradictory messages from traditional actuarial valuation approaches and the alternative market-based valuation paradigm is introduced. The paper then proposes a successful blueprint for this mark-to-market valuation discipline and considers whether and how it can be applied to pension schemes both in theory and in practice. It is asserted that adoption of this market based approach appears now to be essential in many of the most critical areas of actuarial advice in the field of defined benefit corporate pension provision and that the principles can in addition be used to establish more efficient and transparent methodologies in areas which have traditionally relied on subjective or arbitrary methods. We extend the hope that the insights gained from financial theory can be used to level the playing field between defined benefit and defined contribution arrangements from both corporate and member perspectives.

Keywords

Asset/Liability ModellingPensionsMarket ValueEconomic ValueFundingRiskMinimum Funding RequirementDefined BenefitsStochastic ModelAsset AllocationDerivativesTerm StructureAssessed Value
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1997 , pp. 835 - 966
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, T. G. & Randall, P.A. (1990). Actuaries, pension funds and investment. J.I.A. 117, 1–49.Google Scholar
Bank of England (1995). Report of the Board of Banking Supervision Inquiry into the circumstances of the collapse of Barings. HMSO.Google Scholar
Bezooyen, J.T.S., Exley, C.J. & Smith, A.D. (1997). A market-based approach to valuing LPI liabilities. 1997 Investment Conference.Google Scholar
Bezooyen, J.T.S. & Mehta, S.J.B. (1997). A comparative study of investment strategies for Dutch and U.K. defined benefit schemes. 1997 Investment Conference.Google Scholar
Bezooyen, J.T.S., Exley, C.J. & Mehtal, S.J.B. (1997) Credit spreads and optimal capital structures for firms with funded pension schemes. 1997 Investment Conference.Google Scholar
Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. (1980). The tax consequences of long-run pension policy. Financial Analysts Journal, 36, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodie, Z. (1995). On the risk of stocks in the long run. Financial Analysts Journal, May/June, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. (1992). Asset and liability modelling — the way ahead? Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1996). Financial economics — an investment actuary's viewpoint. B.A.J. 2, 809–973.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1997). An actuarial theory of option pricing. B.A.J. 3, 321–410.Google Scholar
Copeland, T., Koller, T. & Murrin, J.(1995) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. Wiley.Google Scholar
Coutts, S.M. (1993). Immunization is dead. Transactions of the 3rd AFIR Colloquium (Rome), 2, 519– 524.Google Scholar
Coutts, S.M. & Thomas, T.R.H. (1997). Modelling the impact of reinsurance on financial strength. B.A.J. 3, 583–653.Google Scholar
Day, J.G. & McKelvey, K.M. (1964). The treatment of assets in the actuarial valuation of a pension fund. J.I.A. 90, 104–147.Google Scholar
Duffie, D. (1992). Dynamic asset pricing theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, A.C.L. & Exley, C. J. (1995). Pension fund asset valuation and investment. B.A.J. 1, 421–469.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1997). Index linked debt and the real term structure: new estimates and implications from the U.K. London School of Economics (to appear).Google Scholar
Exley, C.J., Mehta, S.J.B. (1996). Asset strategy for defined benefit pension schemes. 1996 Investment Conference.Google Scholar
Exley, C.J., Mehta, S.J.B. & Smith, A.D. (1996). Market efficiency. 1996 Investment Conference.Google Scholar
Graham, B. & Dodu, D. (1934). Security analysis. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P.M. & Keuch, T. (1997). Pension funding and expensing in the minimum funding requirement environment. B.A.J. 3, 497–582.Google Scholar
Heath, D., Jarrow, R. & Morton, A. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: a new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica, 60, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T.S.Y. & Lee, S.B. (1986). Term structure movements and pricing interest rate contingent claims. Journal of Finance, 41, 1011–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, H., Kaplan, R. & Mandelker, G. (1978). Pooling versus purchase — the effect of accounting for mergers on stock prices. Accounting Review, January.Google Scholar
Huber, P.P. (1995). A review of Wilkie's stochastic investment model. Transactions of the XXV International Congress of Actuaries, 3, 333–364.Google Scholar
IASC (1996). Exposure Draft 54: Accounting for employee benefits.Google Scholar
IFAA (1997). Comments on IASC ED 54.Google Scholar
Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 323–329.Google Scholar
Kemp, M.H.D. (1996). Asset and liability modelling for pension funds. Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Kemp, M.H.D. (1997). Actuaries and derivatives, B.A.J. 3, 51–180 and 382–410.Google Scholar
Lee, E.M. (1986). An introduction to pension schemes. Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Leland, H. (1994). Bond prices, yield spreads and optimal capital structure with default risk. Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lewin, C.G.et al. (1995). Capital projects. B.A.J. 1, 155–330.Google Scholar
Lockyer, P.R. (1990). Further applications of stochastic investment models. Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Mcleish, D.J.D. & Stewart, C.M. (1987). Objectives and methods of funding defined benefit pension schemes. J.I.A. 114, 155–225 and T.F.A. 40, 338–424.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.Google Scholar
Mehta, S.J.B. (1992). Allowing for asset, liability and business risk in the valuation of a life office. J.I.A. 119, 385–455.Google Scholar
Mehta, S.J.B., Abbott, M.G., Addison, D.T., Dodhia, M., Hltchen, C.J., Oddie, A.J., Poulding, M.R. & Rlddlngton, D.M. (1996). The financial management of unit trust and investment companies. B.A.J. 2, 1195–1253.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. & Miller, M.H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.Google Scholar
Pemberton, J. (1996). Equity option valuation made simple — and more reliable. Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Redington, F.M. (1952). Review of the principles of life office valuation. J.I.A. 78, 286–315.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. (1976). Corporate funding pension policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smaller, S.L., Drury, P., George, C M., O'Shea, J.W., Paul, D.R.L., Pountney, C.V., Rathbone, J.C.A., Simmons, P.R. & Webb, J.H. (1996). Ownership of the inherited estate (the orphan estate). B.A.J. 2, 1273–1322.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D. (1993). Towards a quantitative matching philosophy. Proceedings of the 3rd AFIR Colloquium, 2, 931–948.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D. (1996). How actuaries can use financial economics. B.A.J. 2, 1057–1193.Google Scholar
Stewart, G.B. (1990). The quest for value. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tepper, I. (1981). Taxation and corporate pension policy. Journal of Finance, 36, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorley, S.R. (1995). The time-diversification controversy. Financial Analysts Journal, May/June, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P.N. & Wilson, A.F. (1992). A realistic approach to pension funding. J.I.A., 119, 229–312.Google Scholar
Treynor, J. (1977). The principles of corporate pension finance. Journal of Finance, 32, 627–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wllkie, A.D. (1988). The use of option pricing theory for valuing benefits with cap and collar guarantees. Transactions of the 23rd International Congress of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Wllkie, A.D. (1995a). The risk premium on ordinary shares. B.A.J. 1, 251–293.Google Scholar
Wllkie, A.D. (1995b). More on a stochastic investment model for actuarial use. B.A.J. 1, 777–964.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.F. (1995). An economic framework for the MFR. The Actuary, August 1995.Google Scholar
Wise, A.J. (1984). The matching of assets to liabilities. J.I.A. 111, 445–485.Google Scholar
Wise, A.J. (1987). Matching and portfolio selection, Part 2. J.I.A. 114, 551–568.Google Scholar
Wise, A.J. (1997). The investment return from a portfolio with a dynamic rebalancing policy. B.A.J. 2, 975–1002.Google Scholar