Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vh8gq Total loading time: 0.432 Render date: 2022-09-26T17:30:21.629Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The Realistic Reporting of With-Profits Business. Reference Paper for the Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

D. J. P. Hare
Affiliation:
The Standard Life Assurance Company, 30 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH1 2DH, U.K. david_, Tel: +44(0)131-245-0632, Email: hare@standardlife.com

Abstract

This paper was written at the request of the Life Research Committee of the United Kingdom Actuarial Profession's Life Board. It concerns the valuation of U.K. with-profits business, with particular attention to the market-consistent ‘realistic reporting’ basis currently being used in the U.K. by the regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The paper surveys recent regulatory activity concerning the development and introduction of the new valuation approach, and puts it into the context of a survey of alternative methodologies, both deterministic and stochastic. The particular issues arising when considering prudential solvency are discussed, and various approaches are reviewed and compared with market consistent methods. Numerical examples are given, which demonstrate potential issues (regarding comparability and consistency) with the FSA's proposed approach — in particular the sensitivity of results to model calibration. The authors support the FSA's move to a stochastically-based framework for solvency measurement, but highlight some issues which need to be taken into account.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Financial Services Authority (2001). Consultation paper 97: ‘Integrated prudential sourcebook’ (June 2001).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2002a). ‘Feedback statement on the with-profits review’ (May 2002).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2002b). Consultation paper 143: ‘Integrated prudential sourcebook — feedback on chapters of CP97 applicable to insurance firms and supplementary consultation’ (July 2002).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2002c). Speech by H. Davies: ‘Life insurance — a more realistic approach’ (October 2002).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003a). Consultation paper 167: ‘With-profits governance, the role of actuaries in life insurers, and the certification of insurance returns’ (January 2003).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003b). Press release: ‘Required minimum margin: letter to CEOs of life insurance firms’ (January 2003).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003c). Speech by J. Tiner: ‘Westminster & City 20th Anniversary Life Insurance Conference — Current consultation and the regulatory agenda’ (February 2003).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003d). Speech by J. Tiner: ‘Developments on with-profits governance and the role of actuaries in life insurers and highlights of the 2002 convention for life actuaries’ (February 2003).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003e). ‘Realistic Reporting Approach: Letter to CEOs of life insurers’ (March 2003).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003f). ‘Realistic Reporting: Letter to CEOs’ (July 2003).Google Scholar
Financial Services Authority (2003g). Consultation paper 195: ‘Enhanced capital requirements and individual capital assessments for life insurers’ (August 2003).Google Scholar
Ford, A., Benjamin, S., Gillespie, R.G., Hager, D.P., Loades, D.H., Rowe, B.N., Ryan, J.P., Smith, P. & Wilkie, A.D. (1980). Report of the Maturity Guarantees Working Party. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 107, 103212 and 215–231.Google Scholar
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Realistic Reporting of With-Profits Business. Reference Paper for the Discussion
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Realistic Reporting of With-Profits Business. Reference Paper for the Discussion
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Realistic Reporting of With-Profits Business. Reference Paper for the Discussion
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *