Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:36:11.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signalling Communications and the Roman Imperial Army

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

G.H. Donaldson
G.H. Donaldson
Affiliation:
20, Marine Gardens, Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There can be little doubt that the subject of Roman military signalling installations has generated an excess of enthusiastic but misguided speculation. This paper is an attempt to demonstrate the limitations of Roman military signalling, and perhaps thereby assist archaeologists in the identification of buildings which may have had a signalling role. In essence, to establish the existence of a signalling function one has to prove requirement, feasibility and capability.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 19 , November 1988 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © G.H. Donaldson 1988. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Webster, G., The Roman Imperial Army (London, 1969), 135–136.Google Scholar

2 Baatz, D., Die Wachtürme am Limes (Stuttgart, 1976), 48.Google Scholar

3 op. cit. (note 2), 246–48.

4 Grant, M., The Army of the Caesars (London, 1974), 299.Google Scholar

5 Salway, P., Roman Britain (Oxford, 1981), 570–571.Google Scholar

6 Watson, G.R., The Roman Soldier (London, 1969), 75.Google Scholar

7 Digest, 50, 6, 7.

8 Annals I, 35, 5.

9 loc. cit. (note 7).

10 Vegetius II, 22.

11 op. cit. (note 6), 76.

12 CIL iii. 7449.

13 Caesar, 32.

14 CIL xiii, 6503.

15 Rivet, A.L.F., Arch. Journ. cxxi (1964), 196–198.Google Scholar

16 Tacitus, Agricola, 12, 3.

17 Histories x, 43–47.

18 Webster, op. cit. (note 1), 246.

19 Connolly, P., Greece and Rome at War (London, 1981), 275–276.Google Scholar

20 ibid., 1.

21 De re militari, III, 5.

22 ibid., 1.

23 Richmond, I.A., Aspects of Archaeology in Britain and Beyond: Essays presented to O.G.S. Crawford (London, 1951), 293–302, 300.Google Scholar

24 Farrar, R.A.H. in Hanson, W., Maxwell, G.S. and Keppie, L.J.F. (eds.) Roman Frontier Studies 1979 BAR 17 (Oxford, 1980), 211–231.Google Scholar

25 BG II, 33; BC III, 65.

26 von Domaszewski, A. (with Petersen and Calderini). Die Marcus-Saüle auf der Piazza Colona in Roma (Berlin, 1896), 109 footnote.Google Scholar

27 op. cit. (note 1), 247.

28 MacDonald, G., The Roman Wall in Scotland (Oxford, 1934), 355–356Google Scholar

29 Sockett, E.W., Arch. Ael.5 xiv (1986), 187.Google Scholar

30 Richmond, I.A., PBSR xiii (1935), 1–40, 24.Google Scholar

31 ibid., 1.

32 Steer, K.A., PSAS xc (1956–1957), 161–169, 168.Google Scholar

33 op. cit. (note 28), 335.

34 Crawford, O.G.S., Topography of Roman Scotland (Cambridge, 1949), 51.Google Scholar

35 op. cit. (note 30), 36.

36 BG V, 48. Caesar's use of Greek letters to encode his message does not seem particularly secure, as some Gauls were familiar with Greek, and indeed the Helvetii are reported to have kept their tribal records in Greek, BG I, 29. See also BG VI, 14, for the Druids' knowledge of Greek.