Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T22:44:34.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paul Tillich and St Thomas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The theological writings of Professor Tillich deserve the attention of students of St Thomas, both for their positive

content, which is of the highest interest, and because on fundamental matters they explicitly and sharply join issue with Thomism. They invite the presumption of a certain common ground, certain affinities, and at the same time throw out a challenge which we cannot ignore.

To read these works, especially the great Systematic Theology (1951), is to encounter a powerful and original personality, a mind organized to an uncommon degree around a single centre. Tillich’s peculiar gift is for synthesis; a constructive thinker with a very wide range of interests, he is always striving to correlate and organize these on the basis of a singularly vivid intuition of being in general, the primary datum of the mind, which for him—as for St Thomas—represents the mind’s first opening onto reality as a whole, as both containing and transcending human nature. It is this consciously ontological character of Tillich’s thinking that seems to distinguish him among contemporary Protestant theologians; as J. H. Randall observes, he ‘stands in the classic tradition of Western philosophy’, in the tradition, derived from the Greeks, of speculative concern with being itself and wisdom. Let us stress this ‘concern’. ‘Ultimate concern’ is Tillich’s definition of religion, and by ‘ultimate’ he means ‘that which determines our being or non- being’. Man for him is the being who ‘asks the question of being’, and since God is ‘the answer implied in the question of being’, theology is essentially a searching into the same question.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 The Theology of Paul Tillich, edited by C. W. Kegley and R. W. Bretall, New York 1952, p. 132.

2 Systematic Theology, p. 24, cf. p. 14.

3 Ibid., p. 181.

4 Ibid., pp. 11–32.

5 Biblical Religion and the Search for Ultimate Reality, 1955, p. 6.

6 Systematic Theology, p. 228.

7 Ibid., p. 263.

8 Ibid., p. 263.

9 Ibid., p. 229‐30, cf. p. 88; Theology of Culture, pp. 12–16.

10 Cf. Systematic Theology, p. 88.

11 Ibid., pp. 181–206, 224; cf. Theology of Culture, pp. 30–39.

12 Ibid., pp. 227–31; Theology of Culture, pp. 10–29.

13 Systematic Theology, p. 227.

14 Ibid., pp. 225–6, 183.

15 Ibid., p. 227: ‘God does not exist. He is being‐itself beyond essence and existence’. This distinction of the true God from the false one of whom existence is predicated leads to the statement that ‘Genuine religion without an element of atheism cannot be imagined’. Theology of Culture, p. 25.

16 Ibid., p. 227.

17 Ibid., p. 191.

18 Ibid., p. 228.

19 Cf. Summa Theol., la. xvi, 2.

20 Systematic Theology, p. 262.

21 Contra Gentiles I, 12.