No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Vitamin D monitoring and management in the inpatient services – reaudit
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
Abstract
To survey the prevalence of monitoring of vitamin D on an inpatient ward.
To audit the treatment if there is identified vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency
To compare differences between findings in audits
All inpatients admitted to Milford centre between August 2019 and August 2020 were selected as part of the sample size.
Data were collected by FY1 and FY2
Patients’ laboratory results were accessed to determine vitamin D levels.
E-notes were used to conclude who were vitamin D sufficient or deficient for treatment
The standard for the audit were as per:
Management of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in adults – CKS (2018)
The above was based on National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) guideline Vitamin D and bone health: a practical clinical guideline for patient management [National Osteoporosis Society, 2013] and Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) guideline
2017
48/188 patients had vitamin D levels measured
36/48 patients had sufficient vitamin D levels
12/48 patients were either deficient or insufficient
12/12 patients were treated where found deficient or insufficient
2020
90/115 patients had vitamin D levels measured
47/90 patients had sufficient vitamin D Levels
43/90 patients had either insufficient or deficient vitamin D levels
22/43 patients had treatment documented in noted where found deficient or insufficient
Difficult to make comparisons with previous audit due to difference in number of patients tested
Vitamin D is routinely tested on Milford ward on admission hence the large number compared to the last audit
52% had noted to have sufficient levels of vitamin D
Concerning were results that only 51% of those deemed to have insufficient or deficient were treated based on notes
Potential reasons could be:
Prescribed in medication card and not documented in notes.
Vitamin D results checked in another ward, no supplementation given, and then transferred to Milford house.
Patients refused treatment but not documented adequately.
Patient discharged before results were received due to quick around
Results were deemed insufficient in terms of the range but very close to normal hence decision made not to start supplementation
Results to be disseminated with medical and nursing colleagues
Re-audit in September 2021
- Type
- Audit
- Information
- BJPsych Open , Volume 7 , Supplement S1: Abstracts of the RCPsych Virtual International Congress 2021, 21–24 June , June 2021 , pp. S86 - S87
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.