Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:32:59.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality improvement project: delirium awareness and training in coventry memory services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Nurul Yahya  and
Karim Saad
Nurul Yahya*
Affiliation:
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
Karim Saad
Affiliation:
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

By way of Quality Improvement, this project aims to identify awareness levels, deliver a brief training and thus increasing the confidence of Memory Assessment Clinicians in detecting delirium.

Background

People with dementia are at greater risk of delirium, and the acute confusion associated with delirium may be mistaken as part of their dementia. Despite having an estimated prevalence in care homes of 14.2% in the UK, delirium is under-recognised. Memory Assessment Clinicians may have low confidence in identifying and have low awareness of delirium despite being tasked with a triage and diagnostic role in dementia assessment. NICE has recently updated the guidelines on Delirium in March 2019 with recommendations on prevention and treatment of Delirium.

Method

We delivered a survey pertaining:

  1. (a) Awareness of Delirium NICE Guidelines

  2. (b) Confidence in spotting Delirium

We used convenience sample of Memory Assessment Clinicians in Coventry. Overall, this survey was uptake by 17 clinicians. The pre training survey was done in early October 2019 and the post training survey was done shortly after the training, at the end of October 2019.

A brief training comprising NICE Guidelines and using Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was delivered. The survey is repeated post training and differences in result of level of confidence is done to measure changes. The survey assessed knowledge, beliefs, practices and confidence level regarding delirium detection.

Result

Pre training:

17 clinicians took part in the survey. 59% was aware that there is a delirium NICE guidelines. 12% felt strongly agree, 41% agree and 47% felt neutral in their confidence of detecting delirium.

Post training:

10 clinicians took part in the survey. 50% felt strongly agree and 50% agree that they are confident in detecting delirium.

Overall, the mean difference is 2 and the p value is 0.92034. we used Mann- Whitney Test to measure the difference in pre and post training which showed not significant at p < 0.05.

Participants felt that the training was useful and relevant to practice.

Conclusion

This study showed our clinicians have a good basic knowledge in detecting delirium. As a result of this study, we have created ‘Delirium checklist’ and Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) to be used during duty work. We also feel that the majority of delirium cases referred to us comes from the community base, thus our next step of the project will be to involve educational work with the community care home.

Type
Quality Improvement
Information
BJPsych Open , Volume 7 , Supplement S1: Abstracts of the RCPsych Virtual International Congress 2021, 21–24 June , June 2021 , pp. S229
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.