Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-zdfhw Total loading time: 0.356 Render date: 2022-08-15T01:06:55.556Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to make mental health a higher public health priority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2021

Javed Latoo
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation and College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Peter M. Haddad
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; and Manchester University, UK
Minal Mistry
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Ovais Wadoo*
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; and Middle East Division of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council and Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Farida Jan
Affiliation:
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK
Yousaf Iqbal
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Tom Howseman
Affiliation:
St Luke's Primary Care Centre, Northamptonshire, UK
David Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Care, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK
Majid Alabdulla
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hamad Medical Corporation, and College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
*
Correspondence: Ovais Wadoo. Email: owadoo@hamad.qa
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first recognised in December 2019. The subsequent pandemic has caused 4.3 million deaths and affected the lives of billions. It has increased psychosocial risk factors for mental illness including fear, social isolation and financial insecurity and is likely to lead to an economic recession. COVID-19 is associated with a high rate of neuropsychiatric sequelae. The long-term effects of the pandemic on mental health remain uncertain but could be marked, with some predicting an increased demand for psychiatric services for years to come. COVID-19 has turned a spotlight on mental health for politicians, policy makers and the public and provides an opportunity to make mental health a higher public health priority. We review longstanding reasons for prioritising mental health and the urgency brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, and highlight strategies to improve mental health and reduce the psychiatric fallout of the pandemic.

Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

There have been over 200 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and over 4.3 million deaths globally since the disease was first recognised in December 2019.1 The pandemic has affected the lives of billions through social isolation caused by lockdowns, travel restrictions, quarantine and shielding. Additional stressors include fear of infection, financial concerns, unemployment and bereavement. These are recognised risk factors for poor mental health. The pandemic has been predicted to lead to an increased demand for mental health services,2 despite services in most countries being underfunded and overstretched before the pandemic.3 The pandemic has highlighted the impact of mental health disorders, and the wider area of mental health, to politicians, policy makers, healthcare professionals and the public. It provides an opportunity to redress underfunding and other barriers to providing high-quality mental health, and to ensure that mental health has a higher public health priority. These approaches are also essential to reduce the psychiatric fallout of the pandemic. In this editorial, we review longstanding reasons to prioritise mental health, highlight the urgency brought by the COVID-19 pandemic and conclude with suggestions for moving forward. We have attempted to take a global rather than a purely UK perspective.

Longstanding reasons to prioritise mental health

The high global burden of mental and substance use disorders highlights the need to make mental health a higher public health priority. Approximately a quarter of adults experience a mental disorder each year.Reference Wittchen and Jacobi4 The Global Burden of Disease Study calculated burden of disease using several metrics, including disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and years lived with disability (YLDs). Worldwide in 2010, mental and substance use disorders accounted for 7.4% of total disease burden (DALYs) and 22.9% of the non-fatal burden (YLDs).Reference Whiteford, Degenhardt, Rehm, Baxter, Ferrari and Erskine5 Mental and substance use disorders were ranked the fourth leading cause of DALYs and the leading cause of YLDs respectively worldwide. The biggest psychiatric contributors in terms of DALYs, in descending order, were depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, drug use disorders, alcohol disorders and schizophrenia. These data underestimate the demand on mental health services as they exclude personality disorders and dementia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Population ageing means that the number of people with dementia will increase dramatically over the next decade. Worldwide, nearly three million people die owing to harmful use of alcohol each year and there are 800 000 deaths by suicide.3 Mental disorders result in an enormous economic cost to society, primarily though indirect costs (i.e. lost income and productivity) rather than direct costs (i.e. healthcare costs).Reference Trautmann, Rehm and Wittchen6

The individual suffering and economic costs associated with mental disorders could be reduced, as effective and low-financial-cost treatments exist for many psychiatric disorders. These include cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) and antidepressants for anxiety and depressive disorders, medication and psychological therapies to treat substance use disorders, and antipsychotic medication for psychotic disorders. However, inadequate funding, lack of trained healthcare professionals, stigma and inefficient use of existing services often prevent effective treatment. A study in low-, middle- and high-income countries showed that, in each of the 17 countries involved, most people with a mental health disorder within the last 12 months had received no treatment.Reference Wang, Aguilar-Gaxiola, Alonso, Angermeyer, Borges and Bromet7 A related problem, also seen worldwide, is delay in seeking treatment. Data from 15 countries, including low-, middle- and high-income nations, showed that the median delay before seeking treatment ranged from 3 to 30 years for anxiety disorders, 1 to 14 years for mood disorders, and 6 to 18 years for substance use disorders.Reference Wang, Angermeyer, Borges, Bruffaerts, Chiu and De Girolamo8 Delays tended to be greater in developing countries, men, older cohorts and people with earlier age of onset.

A major contributor to delayed help-seeking is mental health stigma. Stigma can be conceptualised as being made up of problems with knowledge (ignorance), attitudes (prejudice) and behaviour (discrimination).Reference Thornicroft, Rose, Kassam and Sartorius9 Stigma causes great personal distress, with many people describing its consequences as worse than the psychiatric disorder itself. Human Rights Watch recently highlighted that people with mental illness are still shackled in over 60 countries.10

At least 20% of general practice visits in Western countries are related to mental health problems.Reference Fleury, Imboua, Aubé, Farand and Lambert11 Well-designed primary healthcare services can diagnose and manage most psychiatric disorders, provided there is access to specialist services to manage more complex disorders. However, primary care services are poorly developed in many low- and middle-income countries. Their ability to provide psychiatric care is often further compromised by a lack of mental health training for staff, whether they be doctors, nurses, other healthcare professionals or lay health workers.Reference Rathod, Pinninti, Irfan, Gorczynski, Rathod and Gega12 About 30% of general hospital in-patients in the UK have a comorbid psychiatric disorder, and this is associated with poorer clinical outcomes and increased financial costs. Consultation-liaison psychiatry services can reduce in-patient stays and be cost-effective.Reference Wood and Wand13

Most countries spend less than 2% of their health budgets on mental health.3 This is despite the high burden of mental health disorders and estimates that every US$1 invested in mental health will lead to saving US$5 in improved health and productivity.3 Increasing investment in mental health was the theme of World Mental Health Day 2020.3 Problems of underfunding are often compounded by poor integration and use of services.Reference Thornicroft14 In particular, some low- and middle-income countries divert a large proportion of their mental health budget to specialist psychiatric hospitals which only cater for a minority of those with mental disorders at a population level. In some high-income countries, a high proportion of those with relatively minor mental health disorders, which could be treated effectively at a primary healthcare level, are treated by specialist services.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath

Research on the mental health consequences of the pandemic is at an early stage. Many existing studies are cross-sectional, employ convenience samples and report the prevalence of self-reported psychiatric symptoms (i.e. psychological distress) rather than psychiatric disorders (i.e. psychiatric syndromes). Nevertheless, subsyndromal symptoms can cause distress, impair functioning and warrant intervention, though usually at a primary care level. The pandemic's impact in terms of rates of infection, mortality and social disruption has varied geographically and over time. Consequently, long-term longitudinal studies, specific to regions/countries, will be necessary to build up an accurate picture of the psychiatric consequences. Although we focus on its detrimental psychiatric effects, the pandemic will provide an opportunity for psychological growth for some people.

Longitudinal studies in the UK,Reference Pierce, McManus, Hope, Hotopf, Ford and Hatch15 EuropeReference Varga, Bu, Dissing, Elsenburg, Herranz Bustamante and Matta16 and USAReference Daly and Robinson17 showed a rise in the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms in the general adult population during the first wave of the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic levels. This was followed by an improvement indicating that the overall population response was one of adaptation. UK research using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire, administered monthly between April and September 2020, showed that within this overall pattern there were subgroups with different mental health trajectories.Reference Pierce, McManus, Hope, Hotopf, Ford and Hatch15 Most people were either resilient throughout the 6 month study period or showed a time-limited deterioration in their mental health. However, approximately 11% showed a sustained deterioration in their mental health throughout the study period. Risk factors for belonging to this group included female sex, a prior history of mental health problems, being single, living in a deprived area, experiencing financial difficulties and being of Asian or mixed ethnicity.Reference Pierce, McManus, Hope, Hotopf, Ford and Hatch15 It is of concern that the pandemic is exacerbating existing disparities in mental health. Children and adolescents, like adults, vary in their response to the pandemic, with the most common reactions including depressive and anxiety symptoms and female adolescents being at higher risk than male adolescents or children.Reference Meherali, Punjani, Louie-Poon, Rahim, Das and Salam18 The long-term effects of missed schooling and peer contact on future mental health are unknown.

The UK mental health charity Rethink Mental Illness reported a major increase in the number of people accessing its online guidance in the first year of the pandemic compared with the year before.19 High levels of psychiatric symptoms have been reported in front-line healthcare staff working during the pandemic.Reference De Kock, Latham, Leslie, Grindle, Munoz and Ellis20 Previous epidemics and pandemics indicate that the mental health impact on healthcare professionals can be long lasting, with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms being reported 3 years after outbreaks of infection.Reference Preti, Di Mattei, Perego, Ferrari, Mazzetti and Taranto21

A retrospective cohort study from the USA found that 34% of those who were diagnosed with COVID-19 received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis in the following 6 months, with 13% receiving their first such diagnosis;Reference Taquet, Geddes, Husain, Luciano and Harrison22 24% received a diagnosis of a mood disorder, anxiety disorder or psychotic disorder, with the rates for all three disorders being significantly higher than those seen after influenza or other respiratory tract infections (i.e. control disorders). An increased risk of psychiatric and neurological diagnoses was seen in those admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and in those treated in the community but was greater in the former group. The pathways by which COVID-19 could cause psychiatric disorders include psychosocial stress, inflammation, neurotropism and iatrogenic effects. Several studies have highlighted the bidirectional relationship between psychiatric disorders and COVID-19, i.e. not only does COVID-19 increase the risk of subsequent psychiatric disorder but those with existing mental health problems are at greater risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2.Reference Taquet, Luciano, Geddes and Harrison23,Reference Wang, Xu and Volkow24

A report has predicted approximately 11% more referrals to mental health services in England each year for the next three years (2020 to 2023), with the costs of increased activity reaching £3 billion over this period.2 Increased demand is expected to reflect a backlog of people who delayed seeking help for a mental health problem in previous lockdowns, people known to mental health services whose condition deteriorated owing to disrupted care in lockdowns and people who developed new mental disorders as a result of the pandemic.

The development of effective COVID-19 vaccines in under a year, with further vaccines in the pipeline, is an incredible scientific achievement. However, even with the support of the G7 countries, it will take until at least the end of 2022 to vaccinate the world's population. The duration of protection offered by vaccines is unclear, and new variants and vaccine hesitancy may undermine the effectiveness of the vaccination programme. As such, it is impossible to know when the pandemic will end.

Many experts predict that the COVID-19 pandemic will lead to a worldwide recession, which would be expected to increase rates of mental health problems.Reference McKee and Stuckler25 Previous economic recession have been associated with increased rates of mental disorders, with mediators being unemployment and financial hardship.Reference Frasquilho, Matos, Salonna, Guerreiro, Storti and Gaspar26 It has been suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to an increased suicide rate; however, this is not inevitable and there is a strong evidence base for suicide prevention.Reference Gunnell, Appleby, Arensman, Hawton, John and Kapur27

Conclusions and ways forward

An important proviso is that it is only 17 months since the pandemic was declared; the long-term mental health consequences of the pandemic remain speculative. Nevertheless, the effects could be marked and lead to an increased demand for psychiatric services for several years. Mental health has been a low public health priority for decades. The COVID-19 pandemic has raised the importance of mental health to a much wider audience, including the public, governments and policy makers. This pandemic provides an opportunity to make mental health a higher public health priority and gives an added urgency to this need. Many governments have increased mental health funding in the wake of the pandemic, including the UK government, whose latest spending review (SP20) designated £500 million to tackle waiting times for mental health services, expand support and invest in the workforce.28 Although welcome, this amount appears insufficient.

Experts have highlighted the need for society-wide strategies to mitigate the mental health consequences of the pandemic.29,Reference Han, Schmidt, Waits, Bell and Miller30 Minimising unemployment and financial hardship during and in the aftermath of the pandemic is crucial. Providing accurate information about COVID-19 and future developments such as the appearance of more dangerous variants or the role of booster vaccines is important, as studies in the current and previous pandemics found that lack of knowledge about the infection was associated with higher rates of psychiatric morbidity.Reference Meherali, Punjani, Louie-Poon, Rahim, Das and Salam18,Reference Han, Schmidt, Waits, Bell and Miller30 Advice to parents on supporting their children and communicating with them about the pandemic is likely to benefit children's mental health.Reference Berger, Jamshidi, Reupert, Jobson and Miko31 Support is required for those at higher risk of developing mental health problems, including healthcare workers, people with prior mental health problems and ethnic minority groups. The pandemic has been associated with reports of increased rates of intimate partner violence, child abuse and substance misuse, and professionals need to be vigilant for these problems occurring.Reference Han, Schmidt, Waits, Bell and Miller30 Most psychiatric morbidity associated with the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to take the form of anxiety, depression and PTSD. Effective treatments exist for these disorders and should be provided through a stepped care model with most people being treated in primary care. Those with mild disorders and subsyndromal symptoms may benefit from active monitoring, support groups and self-help material. Those with persistent mild disorders or moderate/severe disorders will require more intensive treatment, with options including CBT, antidepressants and, in the case of PTSD, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing. A positive aspect of the pandemic is that it has fast-forwarded the development of telemedicine, including remote consultations, helplines and online mental health resources. These services should continue in parallel with face-to-face services, with patients being offered choice where possible.

Improving mental health at a public health level requires a multifaceted approach that will vary between different countries. Increased funding, better organisation and integration of services, combating stigma, and tackling inequalities and the social drivers of mental disorders are important common elements. Improved training in the diagnosis and treatment of common mental disorders for a wide range of healthcare professionals, especially those working in primary care, is especially important in low- and middle-income countries. We hope the pandemic will give a new impetus to making mental health a higher public health priority.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments in preparing this paper.

Declaration of interest

P.M.H. reports personal fees from Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals and Sunovion, outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

J.L., P.M.H., M.M., O.W. and M.A. conceived the idea for the editorial. J.L., P.M.H. and M.M. wrote the initial draft. Other authors critically appraised and provided input into the final manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

References

Worldometer. COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. [from update: August 10, 2021]. Worldometer (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/).Google Scholar
NHS Strategy Unit. Estimating the Impacts of COVID-19 on Mental Health Services in England. 2020. (https://www.strategyunitwm.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/2020-11/Modelling%20covid-19%20%20MH%20services%20in%20England_20201109_v2.pdf).Google Scholar
World Health Organization, United for Global Mental Health, World Federation for Mental Health. World Mental Health Day: An Opportunity to Kick-Start a Massive Scale-Up in Investment in Mental Health. 2020. NHS (https://www.who.int/news/item/27-08-2020-world-mental-health-day-an-opportunity-to-kick-start-a-massive-scale-up-in-investment-in-mental-health).Google Scholar
Wittchen, HU, Jacobi, F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe – a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15(4): 357–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteford, HA, Degenhardt, L, Rehm, J, Baxter, AJ, Ferrari, AJ, Erskine, HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 382(9904): 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautmann, S, Rehm, J, Wittchen, HU. The economic costs of mental disorders: do our societies react appropriately to the burden of mental disorders? EMBO Rep 2016; 17(9): 1245–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, PS, Aguilar-Gaxiola, S, Alonso, J, Angermeyer, MC, Borges, G, Bromet, EJ, et al. Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys. Lancet 2007; 370(9590): 841–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, PS, Angermeyer, M, Borges, G, Bruffaerts, R, Chiu, WT, De Girolamo, G, et al. Delay and failure in treatment seeking after first onset of mental disorders in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry 2007; 6(3): 177–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Thornicroft, G, Rose, D, Kassam, A, Sartorius, N. Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 192–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Rights Watch. Living in Chains: Shackling of People with Psychosocial Disabilities Worldwide. 2020. Human Rights Watch (https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/10/06/living-chains/shackling-people-psychosocial-disabilities-worldwide#).Google Scholar
Fleury, MJ, Imboua, A, Aubé, D, Farand, L, Lambert, Y. General practitioners’ management of mental disorders: a rewarding practice with considerable obstacles. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rathod, S, Pinninti, N, Irfan, M, Gorczynski, P, Rathod, P, Gega, L, et al. Mental health service provision in low- and middle-income countries. Health Serv Insights 2017; 10: 1178632917694350.Google ScholarPubMed
Wood, R, Wand, AP. The effectiveness of consultation-liaison psychiatry in the general hospital setting: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2014; 76(3): 175–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornicroft, G. Most people with mental illness are not treated. Lancet 2007; 370(9590): 807–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, M, McManus, S, Hope, H, Hotopf, M, Ford, T, Hatch, SL, et al. Mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a latent class trajectory analysis using longitudinal UK data. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8: 610–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, TV, Bu, F, Dissing, AS, Elsenburg, LK, Herranz Bustamante, JJ, Matta, J, et al. Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of 200 000 Western and Northern Europeans. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 2: 100020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M, Robinson, E. Psychological distress and adaptation to the COVID-19 crisis in the United States. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 136: 603–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meherali, S, Punjani, N, Louie-Poon, S, Rahim, KA, Das, JK, Salam, RA, et al. Mental health of children and adolescents amidst COVID-19 and past pandemics: a rapid systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(7): 3432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rethink Mental Illness. Demand for mental health advice soars in year after first lockdown. Rethink Mental Illness. 2021, 23 March (https://www.rethink.org/news-and-stories/news/2021/03/demand-for-mental-health-advice-soars-in-year-after-first-lockdown/).Google Scholar
De Kock, JH, Latham, HA, Leslie, SJ, Grindle, M, Munoz, S-A, Ellis, L, et al. A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preti, E, Di Mattei, V, Perego, G, Ferrari, F, Mazzetti, M, Taranto, P, et al. The psychological impact of epidemic and pandemic outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review of the evidence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2020; 22(8): 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taquet, M, Geddes, JR, Husain, M, Luciano, S, Harrison, PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8(5): 416–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taquet, M, Luciano, S, Geddes, JR, Harrison, PJ. Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8(2):130–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Xu, R, Volkow, ND. Increased risk of COVID-19 infection and mortality in people with mental disorders: analysis from electronic health records in the United States. World Psychiatry 2021; 20(1): 124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKee, M, Stuckler, D. If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future. Nat Med 2020; 26(5): 640–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frasquilho, D, Matos, M, Salonna, F, Guerreiro, D, Storti, CC, Gaspar, T, et al. Mental health outcomes in times of economic recession: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 2015; 16: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, D, Appleby, L, Arensman, E, Hawton, K, John, A, Kapur, N, et al. Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7(6): 468–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HM Treasury. Policy Paper: Spending Review 2020]. [Updated 15 December 2020]. HM Treasury, 2020 (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spending-review-2020-documents/spending-review-2020#departmental-settlements).Google Scholar
Han, RH, Schmidt, MN, Waits, WM, Bell, AKC, Miller, TL. Planning for mental health needs during COVID-19. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2020; 22(12): 66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, E, Jamshidi, N, Reupert, A, Jobson, L, Miko, A. Review: the mental health implications for children and adolescents impacted by infectious outbreaks – a systematic review. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2021; 26(2): 157–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access Open access
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to make mental health a higher public health priority
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to make mental health a higher public health priority
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to make mental health a higher public health priority
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *