Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:57:05.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexical constraints in second language learning: Evidence on grammatical gender in German*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

SUSAN C. BOBB ,
JUDITH F. KROLL  and
CARRIE N. JACKSON
SUSAN C. BOBB*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
JUDITH F. KROLL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
CARRIE N. JACKSON
Affiliation:
Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures, The Pennsylvania State University
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USAscb207@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study asked whether or not the apparent insensitivity of second language (L2) learners to grammatical gender violations reflects an inability to use grammatical information during L2 lexical processing. Native German speakers and English speakers with intermediate to advanced L2 proficiency in German performed a translation-recognition task. On critical trials, an incorrect translation was presented that either matched or mismatched the grammatical gender of the correct translation. Results show interference for native German speakers in conditions in which the incorrect translation matched the gender of the correct translation. Native English speakers, regardless of German proficiency, were insensitive to the gender mismatch. In contrast, these same participants were correctly able to assign gender to critical items. These findings suggest a dissociation between explicit knowledge and the ability to use that information under speeded processing conditions and demonstrate the difficulty of L2 gender processing at the lexical level.

Keywords

grammatical gendersecond language acquisitionproficiency
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 502 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by NSF BCS-0720155 to Susan C. Bobb and Judith F. Kroll. The writing of this article was also supported in part by NIH Grant HD053146 and NSF Grants BCS-0955090 and OISE-0968369 to Judith F. Kroll, NIH Grant HD058765 to Carrie N. Jackson, and the German Excellence Initiative to Susan C. Bobb. We thank the audiences of the 7th International Symposium on Bilingualism and Psychonomics 2008 as well as Victor Kuperman, Natasha Tokowicz, Theres Grüter, Amber MacMillan, Sarah Chabal, and Jared Linck. We would also like to thank Angélique Blackburn, Mark Connelly, and Shara Gress for assistance with data collection.

References

Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2012). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122, 292–305.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The Celex Lexical Database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 85, 992–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303.Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Opitz, A., & Pechmann, T. (2006). Gender processing in first and second langauges: The role of noun termination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1090–1101.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58, 412–424.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (1989). Second-language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning, 39, 535–594.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (2005). Input and SLA: Adults’ sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French Gender. Language Learning, 55, 79–138.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33a, 497–505.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001–1018.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Foucart, A., Carrasco-Ortiz, H., & Herschensohn, J. (2009). “Processing of grammatical gender in French as a first and second language: Evidence from ERPs”. In Roberts, L., Véronique, G.D., Nilsson, A., & Tellier, M. (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 9, (pp.76–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words. Behaviour Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 395–427.Google Scholar
Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1870–1887.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Frost, R. (2001). Two Routes to Grammatical Gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 627–651.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28, 191–215.Google Scholar
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 29, 503–511.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2009). Statistical learning and innate knowledge in the development of second language proficiency: Evidence from the acquisition of gender concord. In: Benati, AG (ed.) Issues in second language proficiency, 63–78. London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis.’ Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F. (2004). Explaining the acquisition and nonacquistion of determiner noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds.). The Acquisition of French in Different Contexts: Focus on functional categories, pp 175–205. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hohlfeld, A. (2006). Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 127–142.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.Google Scholar
Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 2–31.Google Scholar
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process Analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.Google Scholar
Keating, G. (2009). Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59, 503–535.Google Scholar
Kilborn, K. (1991). Selective impairment of grammatical morphology due to induced stress in normal listeners: Implications for aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 275–288.Google Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: the auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1647–1668.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.Google Scholar
Kučera, F., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209–219.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Hanique, I. (2010). Native language effects in learning second-language grammatical gender: A training study. Acta Psychologica, 135, 150–158.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 349–374.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D.P. (1994). Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research. In Cazares, A. and Beatty, L. A., Scientific methods in prevention research, pp. 127–153. NIDA Research Monograph 139. DHHS Pub. No. 94–3631. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Office.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the Competition Model. In Kroll, J. & De Groot, A. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCarthy, C. (2008). Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24, 459–486.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.Google Scholar
Mills, A. E. (1986). The acquisition of gender: a study of German and English. Springer Series in Language and Communication; 20. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I., & Foote, R. (2014). Early language experience facilitates the processing of gender agreement in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 118–138.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553.Google Scholar
Opitz, A., Regel, S., Müller, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2013). Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection. Language, 89, 231–264.Google Scholar
Paolieri, D., Cubelli, R., Macizo, P., Bajo, M. T., Lotto, L., and Job, R. (2010). Grammatical gender processing in Italian and Spanish bilinguals. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 63, 1631–1645.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. (2002). Deutscher Wortschatz im Internet [Online database]. http://www.wortschatz.uni-leizpig.de/ (2002). Leipzig, Germany: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2005), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Radeau, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1996). Gender decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 605–610.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. A. (2008). Second language processing: When are L1 and L2 processed similarly. Second Language Research, 24, 397–430.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L., & De Haan, G. J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22, 1–29.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua 120, 2022–2039.Google Scholar
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N. (2007). The representation of grammatical gender in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from Greek and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 257–275.Google Scholar
Scherag, A., Demuth, L., Rösler, F., Neville, H., & Röder, B. (2004). The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects. Cognition, 93, B97–B108.Google Scholar
Schiller, N. O., Münte, T., Horemans, I., & Jansma, B. M. (2003). The influence of semantic and phonological factors on syntactic decisions: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 869–877.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E–Prime v1.1. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.Google Scholar
Taraban, R., & Kempe, V. (1999). Gender processing in native and non-native Russian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 119–148.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The roles of study abroad experience and working memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & Warren, T. (2010). Beginning adult L2 learners’ sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations: A self-paced reading study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1092–1106.Google Scholar
Ullman, M.T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–122.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Lauer, M., Damian, M. F., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2002). Semantic and syntactic forces in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 46–58.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.Google Scholar
Wegener, H. (2000). German gender in children's second language acquisition. In Unterbeck, B. & Rissanen, M. (Eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition, pp. 511–544. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar