Article contents
Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 August 2012
Abstract
Here we report findings from a cross-sectional study of morphosyntactic processing in native German speakers and native English speakers enrolled in college-level German courses. Event-related brain potentials were recorded while participants read sentences that were either well-formed or violated German subject–verb agreement. Results showed that grammatical violations elicited large P600 effects in the native Germans and learners enrolled in third-year courses. Grand mean waveforms for learners enrolled in first-year courses showed a biphasic N400–P600 response. However, subsequent correlation analyses revealed that most individuals showed either an N400 or a P600, but not both, and that brain response type was associated with behavioral measures of grammatical sensitivity. These results support models of second language acquisition which implicate qualitative changes in the neural substrates of second language grammar processing associated with learning. Importantly, we show that new insights into L2 learning result when the cross-subject variability is treated as a source of evidence rather than a source of noise.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Computational Modeling of Bilingualism , April 2013 , pp. 367 - 382
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Footnotes
We would like to thank the participants, as well as members of the Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Lab at the University of Washington, including Missy Takahashi, Ilona Pitkänen, and Geoff Valentine for their help in collecting the data for this study. We would especially like to thank Kayo Inoue for valuable discussion and insights into individual variation. This research was supported by grant R01DC01947 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to Lee Osterhout. Portions of this manuscript were prepared while Darren Tanner was supported by a Neurolinguistics Dissertation Fellowship from the William Orr Dingwall Foundation and by NSF OISE-0968369. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers who provided thoughtful comments on earlier versions of this article. Any remaining errors are, of course, our own.
References
- 123
- Cited by