Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:58:01.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disentangling bilingualism from SLI: Dissociating exposure and input

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

SHARON ARMON-LOTEM
SHARON ARMON-LOTEM*
Affiliation:
Bar Ilan University
*
Address for correspondence: Sharon Armon-Lotem, Department of English Literature and Linguistics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290000, Israelarmonls@mail.biu.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Exposure and input are often used interchangeably in the study of child bilingualism to describe the learner's interaction with her environment. Carroll (Carroll), in her thought-provoking keynote article, challenges the equation between amount of exposure and amount of input necessary for acquiring a language, and in particular a second language. Carroll, whose diverse research borrows from both generative and psychological models of learning, brings these two perspectives into her exploration of the role of exposure and input in language acquisition, calling for a clearer definition of each. Carroll argues that the input to the language acquisition mechanism is the abstract construct necessary in order to solve the learning problem, and it is not a function of the amount of exposure: very little input is necessary in order to solve a learning problem, e.g., identifying word boundaries, or acquiring a syntactic structure. While scrutinizing the equation often drawn between exposure and input, Carroll further argues that the amount of exposure further misses the quality of this exposure as well as the societal context in which this exposure occurs.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 33 - 34
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abboud, L., Tuller, L., Henry, G., Prévost, P., & Saad, S. (2013). Sentence Repetition as a feasible assessment tool for identifying children with SLI in the Lebanese and French bilingual contexts. Poster presented at the final conference meeting of COST Action IS0804, Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S., & Meir, N. (in press). Sensitivity and Specificity of Repetition Tasks for Diagnosing SLI in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. International Journal of Communication Disorders.Google Scholar
Carroll, S.E. (2015) Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S., Armon-Lotem, S., Marinis, T., Polisenska, K., Roy, P., & Seeff-Gabriel, B. (2013). Assessment of language abilities in sequential bilingual children: The potential of sentence imitation tasks. In Gathercole, V. C. Mueller (Ed.), Bilinguals and assessment: State of the art guide to issues and solutions from around the world (pp. 56–89). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2015). Sentence repetition. In In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J. & Meir, N. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 95–123). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Thordardottir, E., & Brandeker, M. (2013). The effect of bilingual exposure versus language impairment on nonword repetition and sentence imitation scores. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar