Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-22T07:38:32.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Repetition and masked form priming within and between languages using word and nonword neighbors*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

TON DIJKSTRA*
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen
BÉRYL HILBERINK-SCHULPEN
Affiliation:
Department of Business Communication, Radboud University Nijmegen
WALTER J. B. VAN HEUVEN
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham
*
Address for correspondence: Ton Dijkstra, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlandst.dijkstra@donders.ru.nl

Abstract

If access to the bilingual lexicon takes place in a language independent way, monolingual repetition and masked form priming accounts should be directly applicable to bilinguals. We tested such an account (Grainger and Jacobs, 1999) and extended it to explain bilingual effects from L2 to L1. Dutch–English bilinguals made a lexical decision on a Dutch target word preceded by a briefly presented word or nonword prime from Dutch (L1; Exp. 1) or English (L2; Exp. 2). The prime was an orthographically related neighbor of the target (e.g., zwaar–ZWAAN or spoon–SPION) or unrelated (e.g., thuis–ZWAAN or mouse–SPION). On their first presentation, responses to L1 word targets were non-significantly slowed relative to unrelated primes following both L1 and L2 related word primes. Upon target repetition, all effects turned into facilitation. Stable facilitation effects were also found when word targets were preceded by related nonwords derived from Dutch or English words. Simulations by the Bilingual Interactive Activation Plus (BIA+) model account for the major effects within and across languages.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Part of this study was conducted within the project ‘To learn, automatize, and control a second language. Automatization and cognitive control in bilingual word recognition’ awarded by the Dutch research council (NWO 575–21-010). We would like to thank David Green, Kristin Lemhöfer and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

References

Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A. & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 447457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, M., Lange, M. & Van Wijnendaele, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 6585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Van Dijck, G. & Van De Poel, M. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 137148.Google ScholarPubMed
Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 226234.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T. & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Dornic, S. (ed.), Attention and Performance VI, 535555. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cordier, F. & Le Ny, J.-F. (2005). Evidence for several components of word familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 528537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, C. J. & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668687.Google ScholarPubMed
De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P. & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 397428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Moor, W. & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Moor, W., Verguts, T. & Brysbaert, M. (2005). Testing the multiple in the multiple read-out model of visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 15021508.Google ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll, J. F. & Groot, A. De (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 178201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. (eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition, pp. 189225. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recogntion system: From identification to decision. Bilingualsim: Language and Cognition, 5, 175197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., van Heuven, W. J. B. & Grainger, J. (1998). Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 177196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H. & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drews, E. & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Orthographic and morphological similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 10981116.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1987). Form-priming with masked primes: The best-match hypothesis. In Coltheart, M. (ed.), Attention & performance XII, pp. 127146. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680698.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 39, 211251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., Mohan, K. & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art, pp. 337. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 498514.Google ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grainger, J., Colé, P. & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 370384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J. & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1999). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming. Visual Cognition, 6, 461492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J. & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janack, T., Pastizzo, M. J. & Feldman, L. B. (2004). When orthographic neighbors fail to facilitate. Brain and Language, 90, 441452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jared, D. & Kroll, J. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. & Davis, C. (2003). Task effects in masked cross-script translation and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 484499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, K. L., Dijkstra, T. & Schiller, N. O. (under revision). Language switching costs reflect bottom-up lexical effects.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perea, M. (1998). Orthographic neighbors are not all equal: Evidence using an identification technique. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 7790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perea, M. & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In Kinoshita, S. and Lupker, S. J. (eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art, pp. 97120. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Perea, M. & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 668677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollatsek, A. & Well, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785794.Google ScholarPubMed
Segui, J. & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime–target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 6576.Google ScholarPubMed
Sereno, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 459477.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T. & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wijnendaele, I. & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 616627.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dijkstra supplementary material

Appendix.doc

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(File)
File 50.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 1.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 17.4 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 2.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 46.3 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 3.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 44.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 4.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 50.6 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 5.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 48.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 6.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 42.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dijkstra supplementary material

Figure 7.pdf

Download Dijkstra supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 49.3 KB