Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-qp9dn Total loading time: 0.265 Render date: 2021-06-22T08:00:16.966Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Interlingual two-to-one mapping of tonal categories*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2016

JUNRU WU
Affiliation:
Dept. Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition
YIYA CHEN
Affiliation:
Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition
VINCENT J. VAN HEUVEN
Affiliation:
Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition Dept. Applied Linguistics, University of Pannonia
NIELS O. SCHILLER
Affiliation:
Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Both Standard Chinese (SC) high- and low-rising tones sound like the rising tone in Jinan Mandarin (JM) Chinese. Acoustically (Experiment 1), the JM rising tone overlaps with both SC rising tones, but more with the high-rising tone than with the low-rising tone. Perceptually (Experiment 2), the JM rising tone was more likely identified as the SC high-rising tone by SC monolinguals. Experiment 3 examined the role of this two-to-one interlingual tonal mapping in bilingual lexical access. Final high-rising SC pseudo-words were more frequently and more quickly accepted as JM real words than final low-rising SC pseudo-words were. However, both high- and low-rising SC pseudo-words triggered equivalent facilitatory semantic priming on JM real-word targets. The results suggest that different tones are represented in the bilinguals’ mental lexicon in terms of fine-grained and sometimes overlapping acoustic specifications. Lexical activation and semantic activation are partially independent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

Supplementary material can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000493

*

We would like to thank Prof. Xiufang Du, Prof. Jiangping Kong, Dr. Zihe Li, Dr. Honglin Cao for the recruitment of participants and providing spaces for the experiments. We also would like to thank Martijn Wieling and Jacolien van Rij for their advice on statistics. J. Wu's work was supported by a PhD Scholarship sponsored by Talent and Training China-Netherlands Program and by “Chenguang Program” supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. We would like to thank the support to Yiya Chen from the European Research Council (ERC-Starting Grant 206198). The field trip was sponsored by the Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

Antoniou, M., Tyler, M. D., & Best, C. T. (2012). Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode? Journal of Phonetics, 40 (4), 582594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32 (2), 233250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Computer program] R package Version 1.0-4. Retrieved from http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20 (3), 305330.Google Scholar
Blicher, D. L., Diehl, R. L., & Cohen, L. B. (1990). Effects of syllable duration on the perception of the Mandarin Tone 2/Tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement. Journal of Phonetics.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat:doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] Version 5.3.82 retrieved 26 July 2014 from http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11 (03), 303328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom word activation in L2. System, 36 (1), 2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brotzman, R. (1964). Progress report on Mandarin tone study. Ohio State University., Columbus. Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Krishnan, A., & Gandour, J. T. (2009). Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours. Brain and Language, 108 (1), 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, Y. R. (1948a). Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1948b). Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. p. 25. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J. Y., Chen, T. M., & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46 (4), 751781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (2004). Pseudo-homophony in non-native listening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115 (5), 23922392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34 (2), 269284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, J. J., & Lee, P.-c. e. (1968). Instrumental investigation of single and paired Mandarin tonemes. Monumenta Serica, 343373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2007). The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36 (2), 345360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R., & Qi, Y. Y. (1990). Context effects in the perception of lexical tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 18 (2), 261284.Google Scholar
Garding, E., Kratochvil, P., Svantesson, J. O., & Zhang, J. (1986). Tone 4 and Tone 3 discrimination in modern Standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 29 (3), 281293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28 (4), 267283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y. C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32 (3), 395421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howie, J. M. (1976). Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones. pp. 1415. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87 (1), B47B57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, P., & Esposito, C. (2007). Linguistic voice quality. Working Papers in Phonetics, Department of Linguistics, UCLA, UC Los Angeles, 105, 8591.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. (2013). lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) [Computer program] Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html.Google Scholar
Kwong, O. Y. (2013). Exploring the Chinese Mental Lexicon with Word Association Norms. In Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, p. 153. Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Lai, Y., & Zhang, J. (2008). Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm. Kansas working papers in linguistics, 30.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1983). Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11 (4), 373382.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-Y. (2007). Does horse activate mother? Processing lexical tone in form priming. Language and Speech, 50 (1), 101123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2015). Representation and processing of lexical tone and tonal variants: Evidence from the mismatch negativity. PLoS ONE, 10 (12), e0143097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, J., & van Heuven, V. J. (2004). Evidence for separate tonal and segmental tiers in the lexical specification of words: A case study of a brain-damaged Chinese speaker. Brain and Language, 91 (3), 282293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, J., & van Heuven, V. J. (2005). Phonetic and phonological processing of pitch levels. A perception study of Chinese (aphasic) speakers. In Doetjes, J. S. & van de Weijer, J. M. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005, pp. 125137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Liang, J., & van Heuven, V. J. (2007). Chinese tone and intonation perceived by L1 and L2 listeners. In Gussenhoven, C. & Riad, T. (eds.), Tones and Tunes: Experimental studies in word and sentence prosody (vol. 12–2): Phonology and Phonetics, pp. 2761. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T., & Wang, W. (1984). Shengdiao ganzhi wenti [Perception of tones]. Zhongguo Yuyan Xuebao [Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics], 2, 5969.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (1924). Experimental report of 4 tones in Mandarin. Shanghai: Shanghai Qunyi Publishing House.Google Scholar
Malins, J. G., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (4), 407420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244 (5417), 522523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition-A tutorial review. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (eds.), Attention and performance X (vol. 10): Control of language processes, pp. 125150. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10 (1), 2963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. P., & Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27 (5), 545559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30 (6), 11131126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitterer, H., Chen, Y., & Zhou, X. (2011). Phonological abstraction in processing lexical-tone variation: evidence from a learning paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35 (1), 184197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18 (5), 331340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102 (3), 18641877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (3), 402407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Rourke, T. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing. Biological psychology, 60 (2), 121150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12 (6), 445449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, S. H. (2000). Lexical versus ‘phonological’ representations of Mandarin Sandhi tones. In Broe, M. B. & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology (vol. 5): Acquisition and the lexicon, pp. 152167. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ptacek, P. H., Sander, E. K., Maloney, W. H., & Jackson, C. C. R. (1966). Phonatory and related changes with advanced age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 9 (3), 353360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Z.-Y. (ed.) (1997). jinan fangyan cidian [Jinan dialect dictionary]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Z.-Y., & Zhu, G.-Q. (eds.) (1998). Jinanhua yindang [The sound system of Jinan dialect]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Computer program]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 2.15.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Schmitt, B. M., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. F. (2002). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming. Neuropsychologia, 40 (7), 778787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakamoto, Y., & Ishiguro, M. (1986). Akaike Information Criterion Statistics. Dordecht: Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Incorporated.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M., Waters, G., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12 (4), 315328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sereno, J. A., & Lee, H. (2015). The contribution of segmental and tonal information in Mandarin spoken word processing. Language and Speech, 58 (2), 131151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, J. R., & Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 (6), 11911210.Google ScholarPubMed
Shen, X. S., & Lin, M. (1991). A perceptual study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech, 34 (2), 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singmann, H. (2014). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments [Computer program] R package version 0.10–113. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.Google Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52 (3), 322338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (30), 1253012535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Effects of semantic and associative relatedness on automatic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 38 (4), 440458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 (2), 394417.Google ScholarPubMed
van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, H. (2015). itsadug: Interpreting Time Series, Autocorrelated Data Using GAMMs. [Computer program] Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/itsadug.Google Scholar
Wang, H., & van Heuven, V. J. (2006). Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers. In van de Weijer, J. M. & Los, B. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006, pp. 237248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Warner, N., Jongman, A., Sereno, J., & Kemps, R. (2004). Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 32 (2), 251276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119 (1), 597607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, S., & Ito, K. (2014). Do syllable-specific tonal probabilities guide lexical access? Evidence from Mandarin, Shanghai and Cantonese speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.946934. Published online by Taylor & Francis, July 31, 2014.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M., & Diehl, R. L. (2003). Perceptual Normalization for Inter- and Intratalker Variation in Cantonese Level Tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46 (2), 413421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73 (1), 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. (2011). Formulating the identification of mandarin Tone2 and Tone3 in multi-dimensional spaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 21652168. Hongkong.Google Scholar
Wu, J. (2012). Effects of two acoustic continua on the within-category perceptual structure of tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131 (4), 3480 (A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Chen, Y., van Heuven, V. J., & Schiller, N. O. (submitted). Tonal similarity effect: the role of tone in the auditory lexical access of etymologically related translation equivalents.Google Scholar
Xi, J., Zhang, L., Shu, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, P. (2010). Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity. Neuroscience, 170 (1), 223231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, Y., & Connine, C. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (5–6), 609630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, J. H., & Chen, Y. Y. (2014). 3rd tone sandhi in standard Chinese: A corpus approach. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 42 (1), 218237.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. (2009). The time course of segment and tone encoding in Chinese spoken production: an event-related potential study. Neuroscience, 163 (1), 252265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., & Zhu, X. (2011). The temporal and spatial features of segmental and suprasegmental encoding during implicit picture naming: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 49 (14), 38133825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32 (1), 2564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Wu supplementary material

Wu supplementary material 1

Download Wu supplementary material(File)
File 16 KB
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Interlingual two-to-one mapping of tonal categories*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Interlingual two-to-one mapping of tonal categories*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Interlingual two-to-one mapping of tonal categories*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *