Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:54:03.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A service evaluation of a group mindfulness-based intervention for distressing voices: how do findings from a randomized controlled trial compare with routine clinical practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2020

Anna-Marie Jones ,
Clara Strauss Open the ORCID record for Clara Strauss [Opens in a new window]  and
Mark Hayward Open the ORCID record for Mark Hayward [Opens in a new window]
Anna-Marie Jones
Affiliation:
R&D Department, Sussex Education Centre, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Nevill Avenue, HoveBN3 7HZ, UK
Clara Strauss
Affiliation:
R&D Department, Sussex Education Centre, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Nevill Avenue, HoveBN3 7HZ, UK School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Pevensey Building, FalmerBN1 9QH, UK
Mark Hayward*
Affiliation:
R&D Department, Sussex Education Centre, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Nevill Avenue, HoveBN3 7HZ, UK School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Pevensey Building, FalmerBN1 9QH, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: m.i.hayward@sussex.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Person-based cognitive therapy (PBCT) was developed as a treatment for psychosis. The effectiveness of group PBCT was examined in the Mindfulness for Voices (M4V) randomized controlled trial and generated promising results. Group PBCT was implemented as a trans-diagnostic treatment for distressing voices within the Sussex Voices Clinic (SVC), a specialist secondary care mental health service.

Aim:

To conduct a service evaluation of engagement, outcomes and cost of group PBCT within SVC, and to compare engagement and outcomes from routine practice with the M4V trial. Secondary aims were to explore predictors of levels of engagement and change in group PBCT.

Method:

Service level data from 95 SVC patients were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, hypothesis tests and linear regression models were used. The primary clinical outcome was voice-related distress. Engagement levels and pre–post effect sizes were estimated; associated predictors were explored.

Results:

Fifty-nine per cent of patients completed group PBCT within SVC, compared with 72% within M4V. Completers within SVC had lower baseline depression scores compared with non-completers. There were significant improvements in voice-related distress (Cohen’s d = –0.47; p = 0.001), subjective recovery (Cohen’s d = 0.35; p = 0.001) and depression (Cohen’s d = –0.20; p = 0.044); these outcomes were comparable to M4V. Higher baseline subjective recovery and lower depression both predicted improvement in voice-related distress. Therapy within SVC cost an average of £214 per patient.

Conclusion:

PBCT groups can be delivered trans-diagnostically in routine clinical practice. Engagement was lower when compared with an RCT, but outcomes were comparable. The low level of resources involved suggests that group PBCT can offer value for money.

Keywords

auditory verbal hallucinationscognitive therapygroup therapymindfulnesspsychosistrans-diagnosticvoice-hearing
Type
Main
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 76 - 90
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181.10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badcock, J. C., Graham, M. E., & Paulik, G. (2020). Assessing the clinical significance of treatment outcomes for distressing voices in routine clinical practice. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 27, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2410 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bighelli, I., Huhn, M., Schneider-Thoma, J. et al. (2018). Response rates in patients with schizophrenia and positive symptoms receiving cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and single-group meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 380. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1964-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadwick, P. (2006). Person-Based Cognitive Therapy for Distressing Psychosis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9780470713075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P., Strauss, C., Jones, A.-M., Kingdon, D., Ellet, L., Dannahy, L., & Hayward, M. (2016). Group mindfulness-based intervention for distressing voices: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Research, 175, 168–173.10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (2017). UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research. London, UK: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177.10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1950). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. London, UK: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update (4th edn). Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Gilbody, S., Richards, D., & Barkham, M. (2007) Diagnosing depression in primary care using self-completed instruments: UK validation of PHQ-9 and CORE-OM. British Journal of General Practice, 57, 650–652.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodliffe, L., Hayward, M., Brown, D., Turton, W., & Dannahy, L. (2010). Group person-based cognitive therapy for distressing voices: views from the hearers. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, K. E., Sweeney, A., Williams, S., Garety, P., Kuipers, E., Scott, J., & Peters, E. (2010). Choice of outcome in CBT for psychoses (CHOICE): the development of a new service user-led outcome measure of CBT for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 126–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddock, G., McCarron, J., Tarrier, N., & Faragher, E. B. (1999). Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions: the psychotic symptoms rating scales (PSYRATS). Psychological Medicine, 29, 879–889.10.1017/S0033291799008661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M., Edgecumbe, R., Jones, A.-M., Berry, C., & Strauss, C. (2018). Brief coping strategy enhancement for distressing voices: an evaluation in routine clinical practice. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 46, 226–237.10.1017/S1352465817000388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, M., Jones, A.-M., Bogen-Johnston, L., Thomas, N., & Strauss, C. (2017). Relating therapy for distressing auditory hallucinations: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Research, 183, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazell, C. M., Greenwood, K., Fielding-Smith, S., Rammou, A., Bogen-Johnston, L., Berry, C., Jones, A. M., & Hayward, M. (2018a). Understanding the barriers to accessing symptom-specific cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for distressing voices: reflecting on and extending the lessons learnt from the CBT for psychosis literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00727 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazell, C. M., Hayward, M., Cavanagh, K., Jones, A.-M., & Strauss, C. (2018b). Guided self-help cognitive-behaviour Intervention for VoicEs (GiVE): results from a pilot randomised controlled trial in a transdiagnostic sample. Schizophrenia Research, 195, 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobsen, J. C., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J., & Winkel, P. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17, 162.10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jolley, S., Garety, P., Peters, E., Fornells-Ambrojo, M., Onwumere, J., Harris, V., … & Johns, L. (2015). Opportunities and challenges in improving access to psychological therapies for people with severe mental illness (IAPT-SMI): evaluating the first operational year of the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) demonstration site for psychosis. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 64, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 261–276.10.1093/schbul/13.2.261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. H., Jung, H. Y., Hwang, S. S., Chang, J. S., Kim, Y., Ahn, Y. M., & Kim, Y. S. (2010). The usefulness of a self-report questionnaire measuring auditory verbal hallucinations. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 34, 968–973.10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of effect sizes. Retrieved from: https://psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Dettelbach (Germany): Psychometrica. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3478.4245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd edn). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
McHale, C., Hayward, M., & Jones, F. W. (2018). Building a grounded theory of engagement in mindfulness-based group therapy for distressing voices. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 2169–2182.10.1177/1049732318789897CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morera, T., Bucci, S., Randal, C., Barrett, M. & Pratt, D. (2015). Exploring views about mindfulness groups for voice-hearing from the perspective of service users and staff: a Q-methodology study. Psychotherapy Research, 27, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2014). Psychosis and Schizophrenia in Adults: Treatment and Management (CG178). London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Available at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG178 Google Scholar
Payne, T., Allen, J., & Lavender, T. (2017). Hearing Voices Network groups: experiences of eight voice hearers and the connection to group processes and recovery. Psychosis, 9, 205–215.10.1080/17522439.2017.1300183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulik, G., Jones, A.-M., & Hayward, M. (2018). Brief coping strategy enhancement for distressing voices: predictors of engagement and outcome in routine clinical practice. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25, 634–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, E., Crombie, T., Agbedjro, D., Johns, L. C., Stahl, D., Greenwood, K., … & Kuipers, E. (2015). The long-term effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis within a routine psychological therapies service. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1658.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2018). National Clinical Audit of Psychosis – National Report for the Core Audit. London, UK: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/NCAP-National-report-for-core-audit-2018-FINAL.pdf Google Scholar
Sheaves, B., Peters, E., Stahl, D., & Johns, L. (2019). Changes in care costs associated with cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis delivered in routine clinical practice. Journal of Mental Health. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, C., & Hayward, M. (2013). Group person-based cognitive therapy for distressing psychosis. In Johns, L., Morris, E. & Oliver, J. (eds), ACT and Mindfulness for Psychosis. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomas, N., Hayward, M., Peters, E., van der Gaag, M., Bentall, R.P., Jenner, J. et al. (2014). Psychological therapies for auditory hallucinations (voices): current status and key directions for future research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40 (suppl. 4), S202–S212.10.1093/schbul/sbu037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Lieshout, R. J., & Goldberg, J. O. (2007). Quantifying self-reports of auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with psychosis. Canandian Journal of Behioural Science, 39, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, R., James, B., Skan, R., Peters, E., Garety, P., Kuipers, E., Hayward, M., & Greenwood, K. (2020) Exploring the development, validity and utility of the Short Form version of the Choice of Outcome In CBT for psychosEs (CHOICE-SF): a patient reported outcome measure of psychological recovery (under review).10.1093/schbul/sbaa173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.10.1002/sim.4067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, T. S., Jung, K., Hwang, H., Yinm, J., Taylor, L., Menon, M., … & Erickson, D. (2014). Symptom dimensions of the psychotic symptom rating scales in psychosis: a multisite study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40 (suppl. 4), 265–274.10.1093/schbul/sbu014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.