Article contents
Yes, but it was never just about the science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2003
Abstract
Andrews et al. present a clear discussion of the various criteria needed to identify adaptations. However, they also imply a history of the debate between adaptationists and their critics that is incomplete. The history implied is one of only genuine scientific disagreement. This neglects the role of nonscientific motives and strawman arguments on behalf of the critics of adaptationists.
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2002 Cambridge University Press
- 1
- Cited by