Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:14:24.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prejudice in context departs from attitudes toward groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

Alice H. Eagly  and
Amanda B. Diekman
Alice H. Eagly
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60201. eagly@northwestern.eduhttp://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/people/faculty/faculty_individual_pages/eagly.htm
Amanda B. Diekman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056. diekmaa@muohio.eduhttps://www.units.muohio.edu/psychology/user/43
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The analysis offered by Dixon et al. fails to acknowledge that the attitudes that drive prejudice are attitudes that are constructed in particular contexts. These attitudes (e.g., toward men as childcare workers) can diverge strongly from attitudes toward the group in general. Social change is thus best achieved through challenging the requirements of roles and by changing group stereotypes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 431 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H. & Johnston, A. M. (2010) Social structure. In: The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, ed. Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P. & Esses, V. M., pp. 209–24. Sage.Google Scholar
Diekman, A. B. & Hirnisey, L. (2007) The effect of context on the silver ceiling: A role congruity perspective on prejudiced responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33:1353–66.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (2007) The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition 25: 582–602.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Diekman, A. B. (2005) What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In: On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport, ed. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P. & Rudman, L. A., pp. 19–35. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109:573–98.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A. & Otto, S. (1991) Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15:203–16.Google Scholar
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A. & Ristikari, T. (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 137:616–42.Google Scholar