Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:11:09.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Look to the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2022

Rumen Iliev
Affiliation:
Toyota Research Institute, Los Altos, CA94022, USArumen.iliev@tri.global
Douglas Medin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208, USAmedin@northwestern.edu
Megan Bang
Affiliation:
Learning Sciences and Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Annenberg Hall, EvanstonIL60208, USAMegan.bang@northwestern.edu

Abstract

Yarkoni's paper makes an important contribution to psychological research by its insightful analysis of generalizability. We suggest, however, that broadening research practices to include field research and the correlated use of both converging and complementary observations gives reason for optimism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bang, M., Alfonso, J., Faber, L., Marin, A., Marin, M., Medin, D., … Woodring, J. (in press). Perspective taking and psychological distance in children's picture books: Differences between native and non-native authored books. In Nelson-Barber, S. & Chinn, P. W. U. (Eds.), Indigenous STEM education: Perspectives from the Pacific Islands, the Americas and Asia. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Bang, M., Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(35), 1386813874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B. (2009a). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2009b). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, Jr. M., & Caldieraro, F. (2009). Sunk-cost effects on purely behavioral investments. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 105113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, H. (2014). Escalation of commitment: When to stay the course? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 430446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahek, I, Schaller, M., & Tackett, J. L. (2021). Anatomy of a psychological theory: Integrating construct-validation and computational-modeling methods to advance theorizing. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 16(4), 803815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 17221731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfield, P. M. (2017). Cultural change over time: Why replicability should not be the gold standard in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 762771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, C. (1995). Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 3854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brant, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345, 13401343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliev, R. L., & Ojalehto, B. L. (2015). Bringing history back to culture: On the missing diachronic component in the research on culture and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 14.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who's asking? Native science, western science and science education. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(3), 169185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books.Google Scholar