Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T04:29:55.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animal concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Colin Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4237 colin.allen@tamu.edusnaefell.tamu.edu/~colin/

Abstract

Millikan's account of concepts is applicable to questions about concepts in nonhuman animals. I raise three questions in this context: (1) Does classical conditioning entail the possession of simple concepts? (2) Are movement property concepts more basic than substance concepts? (3) What is the empirical content of claiming that concept meanings do not necessarily change as dispositions change?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)