Article contents
Problems with the concept of dominance and lack of empirical support for a testosterone–dominance link
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 1998
Abstract
Mazur & Booth fail to consider the conceptual complexities of dominance; it is unlikely that there is a motive to dominate in animals. Also, the lack of empirical evidence for a causal link between testosterone and dominance is obscured by the narrative reviewing procedure, which is prone to bias.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1998 Cambridge University Press
- 2
- Cited by