Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-wfvfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-06T22:28:54.923Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": false, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Neural reuse implies distributed coding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Bruce Bridgeman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. bruceb@ucsc.eduhttp://people.ucsc.edu/~bruceb/

Abstract

Both distributed coding, with its implication of neural reuse, and more specialized function have been recognized since the beginning of brain science. A controversy over imageless thought threw introspection into disrepute as a scientific method, making more objective methods dominate. It is known in information science that one element, such as a bit in a computer, can participate in coding many independent states; in this commentary, an example is given.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broca, P. (1861) Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d'une observation d'aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletin de la Société Anatomique 6:330–57.Google Scholar
Fritsch, G. & Hitzig, E. (1870/1960) On the electrical excitability of the cerebrum. In: Brain and behaviour: Vol. 2. Perception and action, ed. Pribram, K. H.. Penguin. (Original work published in 1870).Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9:558–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurley, S. L. (2008) The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(1):158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lashley, K. S. (1929) Brain mechanisms and intelligence. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. H. (1971) Languages of the brain. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:643–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskopf, D. (2007) Concept empiricism and the vehicles of thought. The Journal of Consciousness Studies 14:156–83.Google Scholar
Wernicke, C. (1874) Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex. Weigert.Google Scholar