No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Education for Hmong Women in Thailand
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2015
Abstract
The Hmong are the second largest tribal group in Thailand. Hmong society is stratified by both age and gender. Women were considered inferior to men in Hmong traditional society. There was a strong bias against education for Hmong women in the past. Hmong women’s access to education has improved with recent developments in the socio-economy and modern educational system. Today there does not appear to be discrimination against girls in continuing their education beyond the compulsory level. However, the conventional ideas that “marrying early, bearing early, and having many children are blessings” are popular in the Hmong community. Many girls of school age leave school for marriage. These traditional conventions are an obstacle for females in continuing their formal education. Today, the Hmong’s traditional subsistence economy is undergoing change, and many Hmong women are actively involved in business. Adult and vocational education is also an important way for Hmong women to improve their educational level and gain new skills for making a living. This paper is based on anthropological field research carried out in northern Thailand from December 2003 to September 2004, supported by the Asian Scholarship Foundation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
References
Cooper, R., Tapp, N., Yia Lee, G., & Schwoer-Kohl, G. (1996). The Hmong. Bangkok: Artasia Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, N.D. (1994). Changing lives of refugee Hmong women. Seattle, DC: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Hengsuwan, P. (2003, July). Contradictions on the struggles over resources and contesting terrain of ethnic groups on the hill in protected area, Chom Thong, Chiang Mai. Paper presented at the International Conference “Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practices” organized by the Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD), Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
Kamnuansilpa, P., Kunstadter, P., & Auamkul, N. (1987. Hill tribe health and family panning: Results of a survey of Hmong (Meo) and Karen households in Northern Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Family Health Division, Department of Health.Google Scholar
Leepreecha, P. (2001). Kinship and identity among Hmong in Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Peplau, L.A., Veniegas, R.C., Taylor, P.L., & Debro, S.C. (1999). Sociocultural perspectives on the lives of women and men. In Peplau, L.A.
Champan, S.
DeBro, S.C.
Veniegas, R.C.
Rosemary, C. & Taylor, P.L. (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity (pp.23–37). London: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Peplau, L.A., Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (1999). Gender and culture. In Peplau, L.A.
Champan DeBro, S.
Veniegas, R.C. & Taylor, P.L. (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity (pp.15–22). London: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Symonds, P.V. (1991). Cosmology and the cycle of life: Hmong views of birth, death and gender in a mountain village in Northern Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Tapp, N. (1985). Categories of change and continuity among the White Hmong of Northern Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar
Tribal Research Institute. (2002). Tribal population summary in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: University of Chiang Mai.Google Scholar