Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:05:33.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Market-Consistent Valuation of Insurance Liabilities by Cost of Capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Christoph Möhr*
Affiliation:
Financial Risk Management, Deloitte AG, General-Guisan-Quai 38, CH-8002 Zurich, Switzerland, Email: cmoehr@deloitte.ch

Abstract

This paper investigates market-consistent valuation of insurance liabilities in the context of Solvency II among others and to some extent IFRS 4. We propose an explicit and consistent framework for the valuation of insurance liabilities which incorporates the Solvency II approach as a special case.

The proposed framework is based on replication over multiple (one-year) time periods by a periodically updated portfolio of assets with reliable market prices, allowing for “limited liability” in the sense that the replication can in general not always be continued. The asset portfolio consists of two parts: (1) assets whose market price defines the value of the insurance liabilities, and (2) capital funds used to cover risk which cannot be replicated. The capital funds give rise to capital costs; the main exogenous input in the framework is the condition on when the investment of the capital funds is acceptable.

We investigate existence of the value and show that the exact calculation of the value has to be done recursively backwards in time, starting at the end of the lifetime of the insurance liabilities. We derive upper bounds on the value and, for the special case of replication by risk-free one-year zero-coupon bonds, explicit recursive formulas for calculating the value. In the paper, we only partially consider the question of the uniqueness of the value.

Valuation in Solvency II and IFRS 4 is based on representing the value as a sum of a “best estimate” and a “risk margin”. In our framework, it turns out that this split is not natural. Nonetheless, we show that a split can be constructed as a simplification, and that it provides an upper bound on the value under suitable conditions. We illustrate the general results by explicitly calculating the value for a simple example.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC. Solvency II Framework Directive. European Parliament and Council of the EU, November 2009.Google Scholar
[2] Artzner, Ph., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M. and Heath, D. (1999) Coherent risk measures. Mathematical Finance, 9: 203228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bühlmann, H. (2004) Multidimensional valuation. Finance (Paris. 1982), 25: 1529.Google Scholar
[4] CEIOPS-DOC-36/09 (former CP 42). Technical Provisions – Article 85(d) – Calculation of the Risk Margin. CEIOPS, October 2009.Google Scholar
[5] Risk Margin Working Group. Measurement of Liabilities for Insurance Contracts: Current Estimates and Risk Margins. International Actuarial Association (IAA), April 2009.Google Scholar
[6] Møller, T. (2001) On transformations of actuarial valuation principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 28: 281303.Google Scholar
[7] Federal Office of Private Insurance. Technical document on the Swiss Solvency Test. FINMA, October 2006.Google Scholar
[8] Ohlsson, E. and Lauzeningks, J. The One-Year Non-Life Insurance Risk. Conference Paper, Astin Colloquium 2008, Manchester.Google Scholar
[9] CRO Forum Position Paper. Market Value of Liabilities for Insurance Firms. CRO Forum, July 2008.Google Scholar
[10] Salzmann, R. and Wüthrich, M. (2010) Cost-of-capital margin for a general insurance liability runoff. ASTIN Bulletin, 40(2): 415451.Google Scholar
[11] EIOPC/SEG/IM13/2010 (working document). Rules relating to technical provisions under Solvency II. EU Commission services, June 2010.Google Scholar
[12] Wüthrich, M., Bühlmann, H. and Furrer, H. (2010) Market-consistent Actuarial Valuation. Springer Berlin, 2nd Edition, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar