Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T23:18:12.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monarchical Constitutional Guardianship and Legal Métissage in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Maartje De Visser*
Affiliation:
School of Law, Singapore Management University
Andrew Harding
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, Singapore
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mdevisser@smu.edu.sg

Abstract

This article presents a roadmap for examining the phenomenon of monarchy in Asia, which we conceive as a pluralist institution in a twofold manner. First, many monarchies discharge a wide range of roles and responsibilities ranging from the symbolic to the religious to the legal-political. These varied functions can be usefully captured under the notion of constitutional guardianship, and call for intersectional analysis. Second, it is common for monarchies to have metamorphosed from being purely endogenous institutions to becoming ones embedded in a scheme of limited, constitutional government under the influence of ideas from elsewhere. Monarchies should accordingly be viewed as a form of legal métissage, viz. a braiding of local and extraneous ideas, practices, and rules. In this sense, a law-and-society approach is more likely to reveal the nature of monarchies than a strictly legal-doctrinal approach, although some of the latter is needed to fully appreciate the former’s significance.

Type
Monarchy and Society in Asia
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdullah, Adib Vincent Tung (2019) Titles and Ceremonial Traditions of the Royalty and Nobility of the State of Perak, Malaysia, Ipoh: Perak Academy.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Appleby, Gabrielle, MacDonnell, Vanessa, & Synot, Eddie (2020) “The Pervasive Constitution: The Constitution Outside the Courts.” 48 Federal Law Review 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, Walter (1867) The English Constitution, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Blom, Hans Willem, Christian Laursen, John , & Simonutti, Luisa, eds. (2007) Monarchisms in the Age of Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Common Good, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Winnie (2012) “The Monarch’s Gift: Critical Notes on the Constitutional Process in Bhutan.” 40 European Bulletin Himalayan Research 2759.Google Scholar
Bui, Ngoc Son (2016) Confucian Constitutionalism in East Asia, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cairns, John (2013) “Watson, Walton, and the History of Legal Transplants.41 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 637–96.Google Scholar
Chachavalpongpun, Pavin (2013) “Monarchies in Southeast Asia.” 13 Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia 16.Google Scholar
Cohn, Margit (2021) A Theory of the Executive Branch: Tension and Legality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, Linda (2021) The Gun, the Ship & the Pen, London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Congleton, Roger D. (2010) Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Jack, Veenendaal, Wouter, & Ugyel, Lhawang (2017) “Why Monarchy Persists in Small States: The Cases of Tonga, Bhutan and Liechtenstein.” 24 Democratization 689706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Visser, Maartje, & Neo, Jaclyn (2022) “What Would a Pluralist Institutional Approach to Constitutional Interpretation Look Like? Some Methodological Implications,” International Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Economist, The (2021) “Strutting Sultans: Defunct Royal Families are Making a Comeback in Indonesia,” https://www.economist.com/asia/2021/01/14/defunct-royal-families-are-making-a-comeback-in-indonesia (accessed 16 January 2022).Google Scholar
Elzinga, Douwe Jan (2009) “Monarchy, Political Leadership, and Democracy: On the Importance of Neutral Institutions,” in Kane, J., Patapan, H., & Hart, P. ’t, eds., Dispersed Democratic Leadership: Origins, Dynamics, and Implications, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 106–17.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom (2008) “The Global Spread of Constitutional Review,” in Caldeira, G. A., Kelemen, R. D. , & Whittington, K. E., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 8198.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan, Jacob Eisler, Jo Shaw, et al. (2020) “Decolonising Global Constitutionalism.” 9 Global Constitutionalism 16.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew (1996) Law, Government and the Constitution, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew (2020) “The Rulers and the Centrality of Conventions in Malaysia’s ‘Eastminster’ Constitution,” in Kumarasingham, H., ed., Viceregalism: The Crown as Head of State in Political Crises in the Postwar Commonwealth, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 253–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Andrew (2022) “Conventions and Practical Interpretation in Westminster-Type Constitutional Systems,” International Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew, & Leelapatana, Rawin (2019) “Constitution-Making in 21st Century Thailand: The Continuing Search for a Perfect Constitutional Fit.” 7 The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 266–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Andrew, & Leyland, Peter (2011) The Constitutional System of Thailand: A Contextual Analysis, Oxford: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hazell, Robert , & Morris, Bob, eds. (2020) The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy: European Monarchies Compared, Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran (2008) “The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts.” 11 Annual Review of Political Science 93118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary (2010) Constitutional Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Brian C. (2019) “Constitutional Paternalism: The Rise and Problematic Use of Constitutional Guardianship Rhetoric.51 International Law and Politics 774806.Google Scholar
Kamiya, Masako (2020) “Is the Japanese Monarchy in Crisis due to its Gender Bias.” 17 Royal Studies Journal 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1928) “La guarantie juridictionnelle de la constitution (la justice constitutionnelle).” XXXV Revue du droit public 197.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Roger (2000) Monarchy in South East Asia: The Faces of Tradition in Transition, Abington-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kongsatja, Suwanapech (2021) “The History of the Initial Royal Command,” in Harding, A. & Pongsapan, M., eds., Thai Legal History: From Traditional to Modern Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4159.Google Scholar
Kumarasingham, Harshan, ed. (2016) Constitution-Making in Asia: Decolonisation and State-Building in the Aftermath of the British Empire, Abington-on-Thames: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumarasingham, Harshan, ed. (2020) Viceregalism: The Crown as Head of State in Political Crises in the Postwar Commonwealth, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Desmond, tr. (2007) Plato’s The Republic, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Leifer, Michael (2000) “Series Editor’s Preface,” in Kershaw, R., Monarchy in South East Asia: The Faces of Tradition in Transition, Abington-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matsui, Shigenori (2010) The Constitution of Japan: A Contextual Analysis, Oxford: Hart/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mérieau, Eugénie (2021) Constitutional Bricolage: Thailand’s Sacred Monarchy vs. The Rule of Law, Oxford: Hart/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Palmer, Matthew (2006) “Using Constitutional Realism to Identify the Complete Constitution: Lessons from an Unwritten Constitution.54 American Journal of Comparative Law 587636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (2013) “Toward a Methodology for Successful Legal Transplants.” 1 The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polzin, Monika (2017) “Constitutional Identity as a Constructed Reality and a Restless Soul.” 18 German Law Journal 1595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel (2010) The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture, and Community, Abington-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane (2004) “Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction.38 Law & Society Review 389406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, Linz, Juan J., & Minoves, Juli F. (2014) “Democratic Parliamentary Monarchies.” 25 Journal of Democracy 3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straits Times, The (2016) “Malaysia’s Royal Rulers Urge Quick Completion of 1MDB Probe,” https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysias-royal-rulers-urge-quick-completion-of-1mdb-probe (accessed 19 January 2022).Google Scholar
Tridimas, George (2016) “On the Overthrow or Endurance of Kings.” 27 Constitutional Political Economy 4165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tridimas, George (2021) “Constitutional Monarchy as Power Sharing.” 32 Constitutional Political Economy 431–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troper, Michel (2010) “Behind the Constitution? The Principle of Constitutional Identity in France,” in Sajó, A. & Uitz, R., eds., Constitutional Topography, Values and Constitutions, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing. Google Scholar
Tullock, Gorden (1987) Autocracy, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twomey, Anne (2018) The Veiled Sceptre: Reserve Powers of Heads of State in Westminster Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Osta, Jaap (2006) “The Emperor’s New Clothes: The Reappearance of the Performing Monarchy in Europe, c. 1870–1914,” in Deploige, J. & Deneckere, G., eds., Mystifying the Monarch: Studies on Discourse, Power, and History, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 181–92.Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars, tr. and ed. (2015) The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar