Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T03:38:47.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recycled Images: from orphan works to found footage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

Claudy Op den Kamp
Claudy Op den Kamp*
Affiliation:
Post-doctoral Research Fellow Swinburne Law School, Swinburne University of Technology, Cnr Wakefield and William Streets, PO Box 218 – H25, Hawthorn VIC 3122, AUSTRALIA. Email: copdenkamp@swin.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The focus of this article will be on the artistic practice of found footage film-making—with which is understood the practice of creating new films with extant material—and the ‘aesthetics of access’. Lucas Hilderbrand introduces this term in his 2009 publication Inherent Vice, in which he assembles issues of copyright, preservation and bootlegging and applies it to the specific case study of VHS. When he speaks of aesthetics of access he does so in reference to the formal characteristics of the image. That is how the term is intended here as well. So for instance, film-maker Matthias Müller shot the footage he has used to compile his found footage film Home Stories (1990) with a 16 mm film camera off a television screen. Whether this mode of production was favoured for its specific visual impact or for circumventing having to obtain permission to re-use the (mainly Hollywood feature) film material, the resulting slightly degraded look of the duplicated material is a direct result of how the material was accessed, hence its ‘aesthetics of access’. This article argues that the legal provenance of archival material, and potential ways of circumventing legal restrictions in obtaining that material, can be traced in the ultimate form of found footage films. It also argues that in their new amalgamated states, the films emphasise such concepts as ownership and authorship and that they can be seen as illustrative in their allusions to the ways that institutional context, copyright and film form are interdependent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 24 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © ARLIS/UK&Ireland 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Both Nederlands Filmmuseum and EYE will be used alongside each other, highlighting the precise timing of the events explained; Nederlands Filmmuseum will be used to indicate the institute from before 2010; EYE will be used to indicate the time period after 2010.

2. Information relating to Gustav Deutsch's working methods is taken from the transcription of two semi-structured interviews by the author with the film-maker; the first one took place in March 2010 in Gorizia, Italy and the second one in April 2010 in New York, US.

3. 1998 Film Ist. 1–6, 16 mm, colour, b/w, 60 min; 2002 Film Ist. 7–12, 35 mm, colour, b/w, 90 min; 2009 Film Ist. A Girl & A Gun, 35 mm, colour, 93 min. For Deutsch's full filmography: http://gustavdeutsch.net/

4. Thouvenel, Eric, ‘How Found Footage Made me Think Twice About Film History’, Cinéma & Cie, 10 (2008), 97–103Google Scholar.

5. Hertogs, Daan and De Klerk, Nico, eds., Nonfiction from the Teens, The 1994 Amsterdam Workshop (Amsterdam: Stichting Nederlands Filmmuseum, 1994), 9Google Scholar.

6. de Kuyper, Erik, ‘Anyone for an Aesthetics of Film History?’, Film History 6, no. 1 (1994), 104–105Google Scholar.

7. Delpeut, Peter, Cinéma Perdu. De eerste dertig jaar van de film 1895–1925. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bas Lubberhuizen, 1997), 7–8Google Scholar.

8. Christian Gosvig Olesen, C., ‘Found Footage Photogénie: An Interview with Elif Rongen- Kaynakci and Mark-Paul Meyer’, Necsus, European Journal of Media Studies, 4 (2013)Google Scholar [Online]. Available at: http://www.necsus-ejms.org/found-footage-photogenie-an-interview-with-elif-rongen-kaynakci-and-mark-paul-meyer/.

9. Peter Delpeut, ‘An Unexpected Reception. Lyrical Nitrate Between Film History and Art’, in Marente Bloemheuvel, Giovanna Fossati and Jaap Guldemond, eds., Found Footage. Cinema Exposed (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/EYE Film Institute Netherlands, 2012), 218–224.

10. Hertogs, Daan and De Klerk, Nico, eds., Nonfiction from the Teens, The 1994 Amsterdam Workshop. (Amsterdam: Stichting Nederlands Filmmuseum, 1994)Google Scholar.

11. van Gompel (a), Stef, ‘Audiovisual Archives and the Inability to Clear Rights in Orphan Works’, IRIS Plus, a supplement to IRIS, Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory, 04 (2007), 1–8Google Scholar; van Gompel (b), Stef, ‘Unlocking the Potential of Pre-Existing Content: How to Address the Issue of Orphan Works in Europe?’, IIC, 6 (2007), 669–702Google Scholar; Mirjam Elferink and Allard Ringnalda, Digitale Ontsluiting van Historische Archieven en Verweesde Werken: Een Inventarisatie. Utrecht: CIER (2008) [Online]. Available at: http://www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/ontsluiting-historische-archieven-en-auteursrecht-hoe-beter.aspx?cp=44&cs=6796.

12. 'Techno au Louvre' Les inRocks http://www.lesinrocks.com/2000/11/09/musique/techno-au-louvre-11227522/

13. Peter Delpeut, ‘An Unexpected Reception. Lyrical Nitrate Between Film History and Art’, in Marente Bloemheuvel, Giovanna Fossati and Jaap Guldemond, eds., Found Footage. Cinema Exposed (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/EYE Film Institute Netherlands, 2012), 223.

14. Ibid., 220.

15. Patrick Russell, ‘Re:found footage’, www.bfi.org.uk (2013) [Online]. Available at: http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/bfi-news/re-found-footage.

16. Fossati, Giovanna, ‘Found Footage. Film making, Film Archiving and New Participatory Platforms’, in Bloemheuvel, Marente, Fossati, Giovanna and Guldemond, Jaap, eds., Found Footage. Cinema Exposed. (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/EYE Film Institute Netherlands, 2012), 177–184Google Scholar.

17. Horwatt, Eli, ‘A Taxonomy of Digital Video Remixing: Contemporary Found Footage Practice on the Internet’, in Smith, Ian, ed., Cultural Borrowings. Appropriation, Reworking, Transformation. (Nottingham: Scope: An Online Journal of Film and Television Studies, 2009), 76–91Google Scholar.

18. De Klerk, Nico, ‘Designing a Home; Orphan Films in the Work of Gustav Deutsch’, in: Brainin-Donnenberg, Wilbrig and Loebenstein, Michael, eds., Gustav Deutsch. (Vienna: Filmmuseum Synema Publikationen, 2009), 114Google Scholar.

19. Daniel Zalewski, ‘The Hours; How Christian Marclay made the Ultimate Digital Mosaic’, The New Yorker, March 12 (2012) [Online]. Available at: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/12/the-hours-2.

20. Ibid.

21. David Bordwell, ‘A Celestial Cinémathèque? or, Film Archives and Me: A Semi Personal History’, in Cinémathèque royale de Belgique (ed.) 75000 Films (Crisnée: Editions Yellow Now, 2013), 76–78.

22. Delpeut, Peter, ‘Bits & Pieces - De grenzen van het filmarchief’, Versus, 2 (1990), 75–84Google Scholar.