Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:34:36.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art lending in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Lucky Belder*
Affiliation:
Stichting Beeldende Kunst (SBK) – Amsterdam, Nieuwe Zijds Voorburgwal 325, Amsterdam
Get access

Abstract

The loan of works of art to the public was initiated in the Netherlands in 1955 through a scheme set up by a group of artists to encourage people to purchase contemporary art. The success of this scheme attracted support from the government, which was itself acquiring works in the process of assisting artists. Works thus acquired were lent to public institutions and government bodies, but from the 1970s they were also made available for loan to the public via artotheques. These two schemes gave rise to over a hundred art lending centres including hybrid establishments owing something to both; however, direct government support of artists has recently been phased out, and as a result artotheques no longer obtain works via the government and must evolve alternative methods of acquisition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barten, Walter, ‘De BKR’, Museumjournaal (extra number) March 1976, p.27.Google Scholar
2. Develing, Enno, ‘De Artoteek’, Museumjournaal (extra number), March 1976, p. 1316.Google Scholar
3. Barten, Walter, ‘De jungle van de kunstuitleen in Amsterdam’, Museumjournaal, no.23, 1978, no.4, p. 154158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Van Velzen, Theo, Visual artists and government policy in the Netherlands. Dutch pavilion Biennale XIX Venice, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
5. Van Tuyl, Gijs, ‘Holland an artist’s paradise? Some remarks on the BKR’, Dutch Art + Architecture Today, no.6, 1979, p.3638.Google Scholar