Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:27:30.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Word learning by young sequential bilinguals: Fast mapping in Arabic and Hebrew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2018

ZOHAR EVIATAR ,
HAITHAM TAHA ,
VIKKI COHEN  and
MILA SCHWARTZ
ZOHAR EVIATAR*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
HAITHAM TAHA
Affiliation:
Sakhnin College for Teacher's Education
VIKKI COHEN
Affiliation:
Oranim Academic College of Education
MILA SCHWARTZ
Affiliation:
Oranim Academic College of Education
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Zohar Eviatar, Psychology Department, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Hushi Blvd., Haifa, Israel3498838. E-mail: zohare@research.haifa.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We tested children attending bilingual Hebrew–Arabic kindergartens on a fast mapping task. These early sequential bilinguals included those with Hebrew as their home language and those with Arabic as their home language. They were compared to monolingual Hebrew and Arabic speakers. The children saw pictures of unfamiliar objects and were taught pseudowords as the object names that followed typical Hebrew, typical Arabic, or neutral phonotactics. Memory, phonological, and morphological abilities were also measured. The bilingual groups performed similarly to each other, and better than the monolingual groups, who also performed similarly to each other. Memory and the interaction between language experience and metalinguistic abilities (phonological and morphological awareness) significantly accounted for variance on the fast mapping tasks. We predicted that bilinguals would be more sensitive to phonotactics than monolinguals. Instead, we found that Arabic speakers (bilinguals and monolinguals) performed better with Hebrew-like stimuli than with Arabic-like stimuli, and no effect of phonotactics for Hebrew speakers. This may reflect the diglossia in Arabic language acquisition. The results suggest that the process of fast mapping is sharpened by multilingual experience, and may be sensitive to sociolinguistic factors such as diglossia.

Keywords

Arabicchildhood bilingualismfast mappingHebrewsequential bilingualism
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 649 - 674
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Au, T. K., & Glusman, M. (1990). The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: To honor or not to honor? Child Development, 61, 1474–1490.Google Scholar
Ben Zeev, S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1009–1018.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 255–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Majumder, S., & Martin, M. M. (2003). Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Capacities underlying word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 67–73.Google Scholar
Brojde, C. L., Ahmed, S., & Colunga, E. (2012). Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
Bruck, M., & Genesee, F. (1995). Phonological awareness in young second language learners. Journal of Child Language, 22, 307–324.Google Scholar
Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Conference, 15, 17–29.Google Scholar
Deák, G. O., & Toney, A. J. (2013). Young children's fast mapping and generalization of words, facts, and pictograms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 273–296.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (1990). Arabic linguistics: The current scene. In Eid, M. (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics 1 (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2000). Bilingual is as bilingual does: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 451–471.Google Scholar
Eviatar, Z., Taha, H., & Schwartz, M. (submitted). Metalinguistic awareness and literacy among Semitic-bilingual learners: A cross-language perspective. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. In Giglioli, P. P. (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 232–251). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gordon, K. G., & McGregor, K. K. (2014). A spatially-supported forced choice recognition test reveals children's long-term memory for newly learned word forms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 164.Google Scholar
Gray, S. (2003). Word-learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: What predicts success? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 56–67.Google Scholar
Gray, S. (2006). The relationship between phonological memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in young children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 955–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kan, P. F., & Kohnert, K. (2008). Fast mapping by bilingual preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 35, 495–514.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., Gross, M., & Buac, M. (2014). Effects of classroom bilingualism on task-shifting, verbal memory, and word learning in children. Developmental Science, 17, 564–583.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 705–710.Google Scholar
Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 4, 161–180.Google Scholar
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299–321.Google Scholar
Lauchlan, F., Parisi, M., & Fadda, R. (2013). Bilingualism in Sardinia and Scotland: Exploring the cognitive benefits of speaking a “minority” language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Faroqi-Shah, Y., Kaushanskaya, M., Blumenfeld, H., & Sheng, L. (2009). Bilingualism: Consequences for language, cognition, development, and the brain. ASHA Leader, 14, 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. A. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121–157.Google Scholar
Mattock, K., Polka, L., Rvachew, S., & Krehm, M. (2010). The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: Comparing monolingual and bilingual infants. Developmental Science., 13, 229–243.Google Scholar
Munroe, N., Baker, E., McGregor, K., Docking, K., & Arciuli, J. (2012). Why word learning is not fast. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 41. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00046Google Scholar
Nair, V. K., Ravi, S. K., Bhat, S., & Chengappa, S. K. (2014). Fast mapping of novel words in bi/multilinguals. In Winskel, H. & Padakannaya, P. (Eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics (pp. 124–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Omar, M. K., & Nydell, M. K. (2007). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Prunet, J. F., Beland, R., & Idrissi, A. (2000). The mental representation of Semitic words. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 609–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. (2003). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew, Palestinian Arabic. In Shimron, Y. (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Farah, R. (1999). Learning about noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic. First Language, 19, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, A., & Tiefenthal, C. (2000). Fast mapping in early L2 lexical acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 54, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Hadieh, A., & Ravid, D. (2012). Acquiring noun plurals in Palestinian Arabic: Morphology, familiarity, and pattern frequency. Language Learning, 62, 1079–1109.Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Malatesha Joshi, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 3–28). Berlin: Springer Literacy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. (2006). Reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) and in English (L3) among Russian-speaking (L1) children: Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Haifa) (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., & Asli, A. (2014). Bilingual teachers' language strategies: The case of an Arabic–Hebrew kindergarten in Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M., Taha, H., Assad, H., Khamaisi, F., & Eviatar, Z. (2016). The role of emergent bilingualism in the development of morphological awareness in Arabic and Hebrew. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 797–809.Google Scholar
Shany, M., & Ben-Dror, I. (1998). A test of phonological awareness for children. Unpublished test, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
Shatil, E. (1995). Predicting reading ability: Evidence for cognitive modularity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Haifa).Google Scholar
Shimron, J. (Ed.) (2003). Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology (Vol. 28). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. (2010). Fast mapping and slow mapping in children's word learning. Language Learning and Development, 6, 179–183.Google Scholar
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2016). The role of phonological versus morphological skills in the development of Arabic spelling: An intervention study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 507–535.Google Scholar
Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, S. M. (2012). Fast mapping across time: Memory processes support children's retention of learned words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 46. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00046Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Fennell, C. T. (2006). Listening to sounds versus listening to words: Early steps in word learning. In Hall, D. G. & Waxman, S. R. (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 79–110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Chen, Y., & Smith, L. B. (2014). The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Eviatar et al. supplementary material

Eviatar et al. supplementary material 1

Download Eviatar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 799.5 KB