Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:14:26.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spelling skills of children in whole language and phonics classrooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Maggie Bruck*
Affiliation:
McGill|University
Rebecca Treiman
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Marketa Caravolas
Affiliation:
McGill University
Fred Genesee
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Marie Cassar
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
*
Maggie Brack, Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1BI, Canada. Email: Bruck@hebb.psych.mcgill.ca

Abstract

The spelling skills of grade 3 children who had received whole language instruction since they began to learn to read were compared with those of grade 3 children attending a phonics program. The children were asked to spell a list of words and nonwords. Overall, the phonics group produced more accurate word spellings than the whole language group. In addition, the phonics children's spellings of nonwords included more conventional, phonologically accurate patterns. There were no group differences on measures of orthographic acceptability or on preservation of skeletal structure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruck, M., Waters, G. (1988). Analysis of the spelling errors of children with discrepancies between their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M., Waters, G. (1990). An analysis of the component spelling skills of good readers-poor spellers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 425437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, S. (1994). The writing connection. In Froese, V. (Ed.), Whole language: Practice and theory (2nd ed., pp. 149198). Scarborough, Ontario: Allyn Bacon.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Castle, J. M., Riach, J., Nicholson, T. (1994). Getting off to a better start in reading and spelling: The effects of phonemic awareness instruction within a whole language program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 350359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. (1985). Spelling corrections alter childrens voices. Highway One: Canadian Journal of Language Education, 8, 614.Google Scholar
Eldredge, J. L., Baird, J. (1996). Phonemic awareness training works better than whole language instruction for teaching first graders how to write. Reading Research and Instruction, 35, 193208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. (1994). The effect of whole language on childrens writing: A review of literature. Educational Psychologist, 29, 187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, S., Tunmer, W. E. (1992). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, C. (1975). Childrens categorization of speech sounds in English research (Report No. 17). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Rubin, H., Eberhardt, n. (1996) Facilitating invented spelling through analysis instruction: An integrated model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. J. (1994). Towards a model of spelling acquisition: The development of some component skills. In Brown, G. D. A., Ellis, N. C. (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 111128). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stahl, S. A., McKenna, M. C, Pagnucco, J. R. (1994). The effects of whole language instruction: An update and a reappraisal. Educational Psychologist, 29, 175185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, S. A., Miller, P. D. (1989). Whole language and language experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 87116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1985). Phonemic awareness and spelling: Childrens judgments do not always agree with adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 182201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1991). Childrens spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 346360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the “n” of sink? Children's spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhry, J., Shepherd, M. (1993). Segmentation/spelling instruction as part of a first-grade reading program: Effects of several measures of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 218233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varble, M. (1990). Analysis of writing samples of students taught by teachers using whole language and traditional approaches. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 245251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venezky, R. (1980). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wilde, S. (1989). Looking at invented spelling: A kidwatchers guide to spelling. Part I. In Goodman, K., Goodman, Y., Hood, W. (Eds.), The whole language evaluation book (pp. 213226). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Zany, L. (1991). Literacy through whole language. Winnipeg: Peguis Publishers.Google Scholar