Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T05:35:08.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal Talk About Disappearance Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Beverly A. Goldfield*
Affiliation:
Rhode Island College
*
Psychology Department, Rhode Island College, Mt. Pleasant Avenue, Providence, RI 02908

Abstract

This study examines maternal talk about events in which persons or objects are hidden, missing, or absent, and the relationship of maternal language to the child's acquisition of words for disappearance. Twelve mother-child pairs were videotaped in the home during play when the children were 12, 15, and 18 months of age. The mothers kept a diary of the children 's words. Maternal language was coded during four types of disappearance events: peekaboo, hidden object games, missing objects, and absent entities. Children who had acquired gone and similar terms experienced more disappearance events and heard more maternal talk about disappearance than children who had not acquired a word for disappearance.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object performance in 3½- and 4½-month old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655664.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1974). Development in infancy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83121.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to stage 6 object permanence development. Journal of Child Language, 5, 173189.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R., & Fischer, K. (1985). Controlling sources of variation in search tasks: A skill theory approach. In Wellman, H. M. (Ed.), Children's searching: The development of search skills and spatial representation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1984). The acquisition of gone and the development of the object concept. Journal of Child Language, 11, 273292.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1984). Semantic and cognitive development in 15- to 21-month-old children. Journal of Child Language, 11, 495513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, M. K., & Meltzoff, A. (1978). Imitation, object permanence, and language development in infancy. In Minifie, F. & Lloyd, L. (Eds.), Communicative and cognitive abilities: Early behavioral assessment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The child's construction of reality. New York: Basic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, N., & Bruner, J. (1978). Games, social exchange, and the acquisition of language. Journal of Child Language, 5, 391401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1978)Cognitive bases of lexical development: Object permanence and relational words. Journal of Child Language, 11, 477493.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., (1986). Object permanence and relational words: A lexical training study Language, 13, 495505.Google ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar