Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:14:29.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Sidney J. Segalowitz ,
Norman S. Segalowitz  and
Anthony G. Wood
Sidney J. Segalowitz*
Affiliation:
Brock University
Norman S. Segalowitz
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Anthony G. Wood
Affiliation:
Brock University
*
Psychology Department, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada. Email: ssegalow@spartan.ac.brocku.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the development of automaticity in second language word recognition. In an earlier study (Segalowitz & Segalowitz, 1993) we demonstrated that a reduction in the coefficient of variation of lexical decision reaction time (CVRT) - the standard deviation of reaction time divided by mean reaction time (RT) - reflects a restructuring of underlying cognitive processing mechanisms in the direction of increased automaticity and not a simple speed-up of those mechanisms. In the current study, English speakers studying French performed multiple lexical decision tasks. Differences in CVRT were compared cross-sectionally and longitudinally. As in the earlier study, crosssectional analyses showed that CVRT correlated positively with RT for initially fast, but not initially slow, responders. CVRT also correlated positively with RT in longitudinal analyses. These results confirm that, with extended learning experience, the cognitive components underlying word recognition are restructured (automatized) and not simply speeded-up.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 53 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, P. (1989). Individual differences and skill acquisition. In Ackerman, P., Sternberg, R. J., & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 165–217). New York: Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baudot, J. (1992). Frequences d'utilisation des mots enfrancais ecrit contemporain [Word frequencies in contemporary written French]. Montreal: Presses de l'Universite’ de Montreal.Google Scholar
Carr, T. (1992). Automaticity and cognitive anatomy: Is word recognition “automatic”? American Journal of Psychology, 105, 201–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B. (1993). Word-type effects in bilingual processing tasks: Support for a mixed-representational system. In Schreuder, R.Weltens, B. (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 27–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. S. (1982). Second language reading in fluent bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. S. (1983). Automatic and controlled processes in the first and second language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 11, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forster, K. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In Marslen-Wilson, W. (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. S. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J. (1993). Visual word recognition in bilinguals. In Schreuder, R. & Weltens, B. (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 11–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In Carr, T. H. & Levy, B. A. (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approach (pp. 375–421). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Herrington, R., Kennelly, K., Hall, C., & Baggett, M. (1994). Practice and the lognormal distribution. Poster presented at the TENNET V Conference, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennelly, K., Hall, C., Herrington, R., & Baggett, T. M. (1995). Do reaction-time means and standard devis change at the same rale? Poster presented at the TENNET VI Conference.Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. (1993). Accessing conceptual representations for words in a second language. In Schreuder, R. & Weltens, B. (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 53–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, M. A. (1989). Mise au point [Perfecting]. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Dumais, S., & Shiffrin, R. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1–27). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S. (1986). Second language reading. In Vaid, J. (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives (pp. 3–19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erl-baum.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In de Groot, A. & Kroll, J. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 85–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S. (in preparation). Automaticity and attentional skill in performance fluency. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S., Poulsen, C., & Komoda, M. (1991). Lower level components of reading skill in higher level bilinguals: Implications for reading instruction. AILA [Association International de Linguistique Appliquee] Review, 8, 15–30.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics. 14, 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S., Watson, V., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1995). Vocabulary skill: Single case assessment of automaticity of word recognition in a timed lexical decision task. Second Language Research, II, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, S. J., Dywan, J., & Unsal, A. (1997). Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: An ERP study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3. 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, V., & Segalowitz, N. S. (1993, April). Monitoring the transition from automatic to controlled processing.Poster presented at the Eastern Psychological Association Conference,Arlington, VA.Google Scholar