Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-vjhkx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-07T18:03:36.356Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

The impact of lexical specificity training on at-risk emergent bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

Miao Li*
University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
Catherine E. Snow
Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA, USA
Lauren Ely
University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
Jan C. Frijters
Brock University, Saint Catharines, ON, Canada
Esther Geva
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA
Becky Xi Chen
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA
Corresponding author: Miao Li; Email: mli33@Central.UH.EDU


Emergent bilinguals (EBs) who are exposed to societal language at school but use another language at home may experience difficulties in mastering the societal language, especially those at risk for language and reading disabilities. Learning phonologically specific new words that discriminate between phonemes may foster phonological awareness and word reading. This study examined the effectiveness of a lexical specificity intervention program that targeted phoneme discrimination in EBs at risk for reading disabilities. EBs who scored below the 25th percentile on the screening measures were selected and randomly assigned to one of two conditions: at-risk intervention or at-risk control. Of the 76 EBs in the at-risk group, 40 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention. A group of 51 typically developing EBs who did not meet the risk criteria were selected as typical controls. The pre- and post-tests include phoneme discrimination, phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, fluency, and decoding. The at-risk intervention group showed improvement on the phoneme discrimination task after the intervention and outperformed the at-risk control group but not the typical control group. In addition, growth was observed during both the training and testing sessions of the intervention. The lexical specificity intervention could be a good resource to enhance a key precursor to literacy development for at-risk EBs.

Original Article
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Baker, D. L., Burns, D., Kame’enui, E. J., Smolkowski, K., & Baker, S. K. (2016). Does supplemental instruction support the transition from Spanish to English reading instruction for first-grade English learners at risk of reading difficulties? Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 226239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, D., & McMaster, K. (2017). A review of morphological analysis strategies on vocabulary outcomes with ELLs. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 14, 5372.Google Scholar
Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, 1, 464.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., Bridges, M. S., Liu, Y. S., & Bontempo, D. E. (2015). Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 281297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Elbro, C., Borstrøm, I., & Petersen, D. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 3660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Jensen, M. N. (2005). Quality of phonological representations, word learning, and phoneme awareness in dyslexic and normal readers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 375384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eslick, C. J., le Roux, M., Geertsema, S., & Pottas, L. (2020). Phonological awareness and speech perception: Skills of grade 1 english second language learners. Reading & Writing, 11, 110.Google Scholar
Fennell, C. T., Tsui, A. S.-M., & Hudon, T. M. (2016). Speech perception in simultaneously bilingual infants. In Nicoladis, E. & Montanari, S. (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Factors moderating language proficiency (pp. 4362). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Filippini, A., Gerber, M., & Leafstedt, J. (2012). A vocabulary-added reading intervention for English learners at-risk of reading difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 1426.Google Scholar
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading disabilities in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. E. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In Brady, S. A. & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97117). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39, 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2018). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English learners. New York, NY: Columbia Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Gersten, R., & Geva, E. (2003). Teaching reading to early language learners. Educational Leadership, 60, 4449.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Massey-Garrison, A. (2013). A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 387401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golloher, A., Whitenack, D., Simpson, L., & Sacco, D. (2018). From the ground up: providing support to emergent bilinguals to distinguish language difference from disability. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 5, 127147.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological and lexical processes. In Kamil, M. L. Mosenthal, P. B. Pearson, P. D. & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 251267). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Hamayan, E., Marler, B., Sanchez-Lopez, C., & Damico, J. (2022). Special education considerations for multilingual learners: Delivering a continuum of services. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.Google Scholar
Hegarty, N., Titterington, J., McLeod, S., & Taggart, L. (2018). Intervention for children with phonological impairment: Knowledge, practices and intervention intensity in the UK. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53, 9951006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Janssen, C., Segers, E., McQueen, J. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Lexical specificity training effects in second language learners. Language Learning, 65, 358389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, C., Segers, E., McQueen, J. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Transfer from implicit to explicit phonological abilities in first and second language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 795812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzir, T., Goldberg, A., Ben Aryeh, T. J., Donnelley, K., & Wolf, M. (2013). Intensity vs. duration: Comparing the effects of a fluency-based reading intervention program, in after-school vs. Summer School settings. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1, 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenca, K., Gottardo, A., Geva, E., & Chen, X. (2020a). English phonological specificity predicts early French reading difficulty in emerging bilingual children. Annals of Dyslexia, 70, 2742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krenca, K., Segers, E., Chen, X., Shakory, S., Steele, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2020b). Phonological specificity relates to phonological awareness and reading ability in English–French bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 33, 267291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, M., Geertsema, S., Jordaan, H., & Prinsloo, D. (2017). Phonemic awareness of English second language learners. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 64(1), a164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, M., Geva, E., D’Angelo, N., Koh, P., Chen-Bumgardner, X., & Gottardo, A. (2021). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties in English Language Learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 71, 299321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llompart, M., & Reinisch, E. (2020). The phonological form of lexical Items modulates the encoding of challenging Second-language sound contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 15901610.Google ScholarPubMed
Lovett, M. W., De Palma, M., Frijters, J., Steinbach, K., Temple, M., Benson, N., & Lacerenza, L. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). English Language Learners in Public Schools. Retrieved March 11, 2022, from∼:text=The%20percentage%20of%20public%20school,%2C%20or%204.5%20million%20students.Google Scholar
O’Connor, M., Geva, E., & Koh, P. (2019). Examining reading comprehension profiles of grades 5 monolinguals and English language learners through the lexical quality hypothesis lens. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52, 232246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E., Burns, S. & Griffin, P. (Editors). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Soland, J. (2019). English language learners, self-efficacy, and the achievement gap. Collaborative for student growth. Portland, OR: NWEA Google Scholar
Solari, E. J., Petscher, Y., & Folsom, J. S. (2012). Differentiating literacy growth of ell students with LD from other high-risk subgroups and general education peers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 329348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Canada. (2016). 2016 Census: Immigration and ethnocultural diversity: Key results from the 2016 Census. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2021). Number of students in official languages programs, public elementary and secondary schools, by program type, grade and sex. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from Scholar
Swanson, H. L., Kudo, M., & Guzman-Orth, D. (2016). Cognition and literacy in English language learners at risk for reading disabilities: A latent transition analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 830856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition, 76, 147166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
van Goch, M. M., McQueen, J. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Learning phonologically specific new words fosters rhyme awareness in Dutch preliterate children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 155172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Mathes, P. G., Cirino, P. T., Carlson, C. D., Pollard-Durodola, S. D., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2006). Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 5673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Jaccard, J. (2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two year follow-up to difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In Foorman, B. R. (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73120). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2007). Early bilingualism, language transfer, and Phonological Awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 425439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Zirps, F. A., & Wood, S. G. (2022). Developmental Dyslexia. In Snowling, M., Hulme, C., & Cain, K. (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 416438). Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., & Geva, E. (2003). Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th Edn.). San Antonia, TX: PsychCorp.Google Scholar
Williams, A. L. (2012). Intensity in phonological intervention: is there a prescribed amount? International Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 14, 456461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1988). The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson® III Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar